[go: up one dir, main page]

create a website
Why Did Bank Stocks Crash During COVID-19?. (2021). Steffen, Sascha ; Engle, Robert ; Acharya, Viral.
In: NBER Working Papers.
RePEc:nbr:nberwo:28559.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 28

Citations received by this document

Cites: 54

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Domestic lending and the pandemic: How does banks’ exposure to COVID-19 abroad affect their lending in the United States?. (2024). Wei, Andrew ; Temesvary, Judit.
    In: Journal of International Money and Finance.
    RePEc:eee:jimfin:v:143:y:2024:i:c:s026156062400041x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Capital Regulations and the Management of Credit Commitments during Crisis Times*. (2023). Teresa, Maria ; Pelzl, Paul.
    In: Review of Finance.
    RePEc:oup:revfin:v:27:y:2023:i:5:p:1781-1821..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. COVID-19, a blessing in disguise for the Tech sector: Evidence from stock price crash risk. (2023). Xu, Jian ; Masum, Abdullah-Al ; Hossain, Ashrafee T.
    In: Research in International Business and Finance.
    RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:65:y:2023:i:c:s0275531923000648.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Does the source of uncertainty matter? The impact of financial, newspaper and Twitter-based measures on U.S. banks. (2023). Hitz, Lukas ; Burghof, Hans-Peter ; Burghartz, Kaspar ; Bales, Stephan.
    In: Research in International Business and Finance.
    RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:65:y:2023:i:c:s0275531923000533.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Firm-bank linkages and optimal policies after a rare disaster. (2023). Villacorta, Alonso ; Segura, Anatoli.
    In: Journal of Financial Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:149:y:2023:i:2:p:296-322.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Deal! Market reactions to the agreement on the EU Covid-19 recovery fund. (2023). ap Gwilym, Owain ; Molyneux, Philip ; Pancotto, Livia.
    In: Journal of Financial Stability.
    RePEc:eee:finsta:v:67:y:2023:i:c:s1572308923000578.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Quantifying financial stability trade-offs for monetary policy: a quantile VAR approach. (2023). Lund-Thomsen, Frederik ; Kremer, Manfred ; Chavleishvili, Sulkhan.
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ecb:ecbwps:20232833.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Useful, usable, and used? Buffer usability during the Covid-19 crisis. (2023). Rajan, Aniruddha ; Naylor, Matthew ; Mathur, Aakriti.
    In: Bank of England working papers.
    RePEc:boe:boeewp:1011.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. The role of state-owned banks in crises: Evidence from German banks during COVID-19. (2022). Li, Xiang.
    In: IWH Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:iwhdps:62022.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Measuring and stress-testing market-implied bank capital. (2022). Fuster, Andreas ; Jondeau, Eric ; Indergand, Martin.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:snb:snbwpa:2022-02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. The dark side of globalization: Evidence from the impact of COVID-19 on multinational companies. (2022). Senbet, Lemma W ; Megginson, William L ; Knill, April ; Guedhami, Omrane.
    In: Journal of International Business Studies.
    RePEc:pal:jintbs:v:53:y:2022:i:8:d:10.1057_s41267-022-00540-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. COVID-19 and Corporate Finance. (2022). Pagano, Marco ; Zechner, Josef.
    In: Review of Corporate Finance Studies.
    RePEc:oup:rcorpf:v:11:y:2022:i:4:p:849-879..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. The Primary and Secondary Corporate Credit Facilities. (2022). Cox, Caren ; Boyarchenko, Nina ; Steiner, Patrick ; Shachar, OR ; Kovner, Anna ; Danzig, Andrew ; Crump, Richard K.
    In: Economic Policy Review.
    RePEc:fip:fednep:94430.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Does diversification protect European banks’ market valuations in a pandemic?. (2022). Vander Vennet, Rudi ; Simoens, Mathieu.
    In: Finance Research Letters.
    RePEc:eee:finlet:v:44:y:2022:i:c:s1544612321001744.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Sovereign and bank dependence in the eurozone: A multi-scale approach using wavelet-network analysis. (2022). Bales, Stephan.
    In: International Review of Financial Analysis.
    RePEc:eee:finana:v:83:y:2022:i:c:s1057521922002514.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Has COVID-19 hindered small business activities? The role of Fintech. (2022). Gao, Jingyi.
    In: Economic Analysis and Policy.
    RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:74:y:2022:i:c:p:297-308.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. The Leading Role of Bank Supply Shocks. (2022). Villamizar-Villegas, mauricio ; bonilla mejia, leonardo ; Ruiz-Sanchez, Maria Alejandra ; Bonilla-Mejia, Leonardo.
    In: Borradores de Economia.
    RePEc:bdr:borrec:1205.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Banking Research in the Time of COVID-19. (2021). Demirguc-Kunt, Asli ; Berger, Allen N.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:9782.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The Resilience of the U.S. Corporate Bond Market During Financial Crises. (2021). Benmelech, Efraim ; Becker, Bo.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:28868.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. COVID Response: The Primary and Secondary Corporate Credit Facilities. (2021). Shachar, Or ; Kovner, Anna ; Crump, Richard ; Boyarchenko, Nina ; Danzig, Andrew ; Cox, Caren ; Steiner, Patrick.
    In: Staff Reports.
    RePEc:fip:fednsr:93083.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Domestic Lending and the Pandemic: How Does Banks Exposure to Covid-19 Abroad Affect Their Lending in the United States?. (2021). Temesvary, Judit ; Wei, Andrew.
    In: Finance and Economics Discussion Series.
    RePEc:fip:fedgfe:2021-56.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. The Last Resort in a Changing Landscape. (2021). Daly, Mary.
    In: Speech.
    RePEc:fip:fedfsp:91338.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Banking sector performance during the COVID-19 crisis. (2021). Demirguc-Kunt, Asli ; Ruiz-Ortega, Claudia ; Pedraza, Alvaro ; Demirgu-Kunt, Asli.
    In: Journal of Banking & Finance.
    RePEc:eee:jbfina:v:133:y:2021:i:c:s0378426621002570.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. COVID-19, volatility dynamics, and sentiment trading. (2021). Li, Jingrui ; John, Kose.
    In: Journal of Banking & Finance.
    RePEc:eee:jbfina:v:133:y:2021:i:c:s0378426621001217.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Banking research in the time of COVID-19. (2021). Demirguc-Kunt, Asli ; Demirgu-Kunt, Asli ; Berger, Allen N.
    In: Journal of Financial Stability.
    RePEc:eee:finsta:v:57:y:2021:i:c:s157230892100098x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. A. Berger and Bouwman (2009) liquidity creation measure To replicate the Berger-Bouwman (2009) measure on liquidity creation using FR Y-9C data, we apply the data mapping available in Berger et al. (2020).24 Individual on- and off-balance sheet items are aggregated and weighted in line with the classification provided by Berger & Bouwman (2009). Finally, the weighted positions are combined to the aggregate liquidity creation measure for each bank holding company. Note that we only replicate Berger & Bouwman’s so-called “catfat” measure, which is constructed by classifying balance sheet items by category (see Berger & Bouwman, 2009) and includes on- as well as off-balance sheet positions.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Acharya, V. and N. Mora, 2015, A Crisis of Banks as Liquidity Providers, Journal of Finance, 2015, 70(1), 1-44.

  3. Acharya, V., and S. Steffen, 2020b, The risk of being a fallen angel and the corporate dash for cash in the midst of COVID. Review of Corporate Finance Studies 9 (3), 430-471.

  4. Acharya, V., L. Pedersen, T. Philippon, and M. Richardson, 2016, Measuring systemic risk, Review of Financial Studies, 30, 2-47.

  5. Acharya, V., P. Schnabl, G. Suarez, 2013, Securitization Without Risk Transfer, Journal of Financial Economics, 107, 515-536 Acharya, V., and S. Steffen, 2020a, ‘Stress tests’ for banks as liquidity insurers in a time of COVID. CEPR VoxEU.org.

  6. Acharya, V., R. Engle, and M. Richardson, 2012, Capital shortfall: a new approach to ranking and regulating systemic risks. American Economic Review 102, 59–64.

  7. Allen, F., and A. M. Santomero. 1998. The Theory of Financial Intermediation. Journal of Banking and Finance 21:1461–85.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. B. Bai et al. (2018) liquidity risk measure (LMI) To construct the Bai et al. (2018) liquidity mismatch index (LMI), we use information provided in the paper’s Online Appendix together with the FR Y-9C call report template for 2019Q4 to map all balance sheet items, except deposits, to the variables in our dataset. The deposit data is constructed in line with the approach outlined in Bai et al. (2018), using FFIEC 031 call report data for commercial banks aggregated for the respective parent bank holding company.25 24 Berger, A.N., C.H.S. Bouwman, B. Imbierowicz and C. Rauch (2020), How are banks special? – Let me count the ways. 25 We thank Jennie Bai for detailed guidance how to construct their measure. 76 Commercial banks and bank holding companies are matched with the help of the FSSD’s relationship table. We consider a bank holding company to be a commercial bank’s parent, if their relationship exists at least until 31 December 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Bai, J., A. Krishnamurthy, C.-H. Weymuller, 2018, Measuring liquidity mismatch in the banking sector. Journal of Finance 73, 51-93.

  10. Banks are heavily exposed through loans provided to this sector. Both bank exposures and the riskiness of energy firm balance sheets have risen steadily in the recent years. We measure a bank’s exposure to the oil sector using all active loans at the end of Q4:2019 and scaled by Tier 1 capital.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Behn, M., R. Haselmann, and V. Vig, 2016, The limits of model-based regulation, Working Paper.

  12. Berg, T., A. Saunders, S. Steffen and D. Streitz, 2017, Mind the Gap: The Difference between U.S. and European Loan Rates, Review of Financial Studies, 30(3), 948-987. 38 Berger, A., and C. Bouwman, 2009, Bank liquidity creation, Review of Financial Studies, 22(9), 3779-3837.

  13. Bhattacharya, S., and A. V. Thakor. 1993. Contemporary Banking Theory. Journal of Financial Intermediation 3:2–50 Brownlees, C., and R. Engle, 2017, SRISK: A Conditional Capital Shortfall Measure of Systemic Risk, Review of Financial Studies, 30 (1), 48–79.

  14. Call Reports Why did bank stocks crash during COVID-19? Viral V. Acharya† Robert Engle‡ Sascha Steffen* March 8, 2021 Online Appendix (Not for publication) †

  15. Chodorow-Reich, G., O. Darmouni, S. Luck, and M. Plosser, 2020, Bank liquidity provision across the firm size distribution, Working Paper.

  16. Cornett, M., J. McNutt, P. Strahan, and H. Tehranian, 2011, Liquidity risk management and credit supply in the financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(2), pp.297312.

  17. Coval, J. D., and A. V. Thakor. 2005. Financial Intermediation as a Beliefs-Bridge between Optimists and Pessimists. Journal of Financial Economics 75:535–69.

  18. Darmouni, O., and K. Y. Siani, 2020. Crowding Out Bank Loans: Liquidity-Driven Bond Issuance. Working Paper, Columbia University.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Deep, A., and G. Schaefer. 2004. Are Banks Liquidity Transformers? Working Paper, Harvard University.

  20. Demirguc-Kunt, A., A. Pedraza, and C. Ruiz-Ortega, 2020, Banking sector performance during the COVID-19 crisis, Working Paper, World Bank.

  21. Demsetz, R., and P. Strahan, 1997, Diversification, size, and risk at bank holding companies, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 29(3), 300-313.

  22. Egan, M., S. Lewellen, A. Sunderam, 2020, The cross section of bank value. Working Paper. 39 Fahlenbrach, R., R. Prilmeier, and R.s M. Stulz, 2012, This Time is the Same: Using Bank Performance in 1998 to Explain Bank Performance During the Recent Financial Crisis, Journal of Finance 67, 2139-2185.

  23. Fahlenbrach, R., K. Rageth, and R. M. Stulz, 2020, How valuable is financial flexibility when revenue stops? Evidence from the Covid-19 crisis. Review of Financial Studies, forthcoming.

  24. Gatev, E., and P. Strahan, 2006, Banks' Advantage in Hedging Liquidity Risk: Theory and Evidence from the Commercial Paper Market. Journal of Finance 61(2), 867-892.

  25. Gilchrist, S., and E. Zakrajšek. 2012. "Credit Spreads and Business Cycle Fluctuations." American Economic Review 102 (4): 1692-1720.

  26. Gormsen, N. J., and R. S. J. Koijen. 2020. Coronavirus: Impact on stock prices and growth expectations. Review of Asset Pricing Studies 10 (4), 574-597.

  27. Greenwald, D. L., J. Krainer, and P. Paul, 2020, The credit line channel, Working Paper.

  28. Holmstrom, B., and J. Tirole. 1998. Public and Private Supply of Liquidity. Journal of Political Economy 106:1–40.

  29. In addition to the tests in the main paper, we perform an event study using a 2-day window around 9 March 2020 and plot banks’ 2-day beta adjusted return (= "! − $!""&$)23 on banks’ exposure to the oil & gas sector scaled by Tier 1 capital (Figure A.2.). We find a significant negative correlation suggesting that oil price risk is priced in bank stock returns. 23 The beta is measured pre-crisis, i.e., at the end of Q4 2019. 65 Figure A1. Industry performance during COVID-19 This figure shows the performance of some sectors during COVID-19 using different measures. In Panel A, we plot the total loan return since Jan 1, 2020 of traded in the secondary market in the following sectors: mining, oil & gas retail, leisure, hotel & gaming. In Panel B, we plot oil price volatility (CVOX) since July 1, 2007.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. In the next step, we calculate the asset and liability weights per category as indicated in Bai et al. (2018) using the parameters and estimates provided by the authors. Accordingly, haircut values as well as the magnitude of the Frist Principal Component used in constructing our measure are averages taken from Bai et al. (2018). As described in the main text of the paper, we use two different proxies for the liquidity premium μt, which is defined as the OIS -3m Treasury Bill spread. We create two LMIs, one using liquidity conditions as of Q4 2019 (LMI – 2019) and one using the worst liquidity condition in March 2020 (LMI – 2020). We weigh the aggregate positions with the respective asset/liability weight to calculate the liquidity risk measure per bank holding company.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Ivashina, V., and D. Scharfstein, 2010, Bank Lending During the Financial Crisis of 2008, Journal of Financial Economics, 97(3), 319–338.

  32. Journal of Financial Intermediation 13:90–95. 41 Figure 1. Cumulative drawdowns and bank stock prices Panel A shows the cumulative credit line drawdowns of U.S. firms over the March 1, 2020 to July 1, 2020 period in billion USD. Panel B shows the stock prices of U.S. firms by sector, specifically firms from the energy, banking and other sectors, since Jan 1st , 2020. All variables are defined in Appendix II.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Kapan, T., and C. Minoiu, 2020, Liquidity Insurance vs. Credit Provision: Evidence from the COVID-19 Crisis, Working Paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Kashyap, A., R. Rajan and J. Stein, 2002, Banks as Liquidity Providers: An Explanation for the Coexistence of Lending and Deposit-taking, Journal of Finance 57(1) 33.73.

  35. Landier, A., and D. Thesmar, 2020, Earnings Expectations in the COVID Crisis, MIT Working Paper.

  36. Li, L., and P. Strahan, 2020, Who Supplies PPP Loans (And Does it Matter)? Banks, Relationships and the COVID Crisis, NBER Working Paper.

  37. Li, L., P. Strahan, and S. Zhang, 2020, Banks as Lenders of First Resort: Evidence from the COVID-19 Crisis, Review of Corporate Finance Studies 9(3), 472-500. 40 Pagano, M., C. Wagner, and J. Zechner, 2020, Disaster resilience and asset prices. Working Paper, University of Naples.

  38. Loan spreads are constructed using a weighted average (with facility amounts as weights). Bond spreads are constructed based on Gilchrist and Zakrajšek (2012) and obtained from the Federal Reserve website.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. NYU Stern School of Business, 44 West Fourth Street, Suite 9-10, New York, NY 10012-1126, Email: vacharya@stern.nyu.edu, Tel: +1 212 998 0354. ‡
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. NYU Stern School of Business, 44 West Fourth Street, Suite 9-62, New York, NY 10012-1126, Email: rengle@stern.nyu.edu, Tel: +1 212 998 0710. *
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Panel A. Bank stock returns Panel B. Bank stock return and liquidity risk 45 Figure 5. Stock prices and liquidity risk of U.S. banks (2007-2009) This figure shows stock prices of U.S. banks with Low or High Liquidity Risk for the Jan 2007 to Jan 2010 period.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Panel A. Cumulative drawdowns (in USD bn) Panel B. Stock prices of banks vs. non-financial firms 42 Figure 2. Loan vs. bond spreads This figure shows the time-series difference of loan and bond spreads (Panel A) and splitting loans by rating classes (Panel B). The loan spread is calculated based on Saunders et al. (2021). The sample is based on all loans traded in 2020 that were traded in the U.S. Leveraged Loan Index (LLI) obtained from Leveraged Commentary and Data (LCD) and matched to secondary loan market trading data from Refinitiv. The sample thus comprises about 1,000 U.S. non-financial firms. 3% of the observations are unrated (based on S&P ratings), 25% are CCC-C rated, 54% are B rated, 15% BB rated and 3% BBB rated. Loans with a “D” rating are dropped from the sample (35 firms).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Panel A. Liquidity risk Panel B. Components of liquidity risk 44 Figure 4. Stock prices and liquidity risk of U.S. banks This figure shows stock prices of U.S. banks with Low or High Liquidity Risk. We measure Liquidity Risk as undrawn commitments plus wholesale finance minus cash or cash equivalents (all relative to assets) and use a median split to distinguish between banks with Low vs. High Liquidity Risk. Panel A shows the stock prices of both group of banks indexed at Jan 1, 2020, Panel B shows the difference between the stock prices (in percentage point). Panel B plots bank stock returns during the March 1 – March 23, 2020 period on Liquidity Risk. All variables are defined in Appendix II.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Panel A. Loan-bond-spread difference Panel B. Loan-bond-spread difference (by rating) 43 Figure 3. Bank balance-sheet liquidity risk This figure shows the time-series of balance-sheet Liquidity Risk over the Q1 2010 to Q3 2020 period. We measure Liquidity Risk as undrawn commitments plus wholesale finance minus cash or cash equivalents (all relative to assets). All variables are defined in Appendix II.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Panel A. Total loan return by industry Panel B. Oil price volatility 66 Figure A2. Event study around the oil price shock (9 March 2020) This figure plots the 2-day beta adjusted bank stock return around the oil price shock on March 9, 2002 on banks’ loan exposure to the oil & gas industry scaled by Tier 1 capital. 67 Appendix B. Reversal of Credit Line Drawdowns To investigate the effect of credit risk on corporate cash holdings during the COVID-19 pandemic, we construct a sample of all publicly listed U.S. firms, for which financial variables are available at the end of 2019 in Capital IQ. We drop financial firms and utilities and firms with total assets below US$100 million at the end of 2019. Our final sample comprises 1,971 U.S. nonfinancial firms. We construct the sample following Acharya and Steffen (2020).

  46. Panel B of Figure A.1. show the time-series of oil-price volatility using the CVOX oil price volatility index. While oil price volatility increases episodically during economic downturns (e.g., during the global financial crisis (GFC), i.e., the 2007 to 2009 period), the European sovereign debt crisis (2011-2012), and the oil & gas crisis in 2015-2016), volatility has increased by more than 6 times (to over 100% on an annualized basis) around March 9th , 2020 and energy stocks crashed.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Preference for cash has increased / remained high during the 3 quarters in 2020, particularly of lower rated and unrated firms. 72 Appendix C – SRISK-C using only unused C&I loans In Online Appendix C, we calculate SRISK-C but use only unused C&I loans (and the estimated coffients) . Everything else is as in Table 9 of the main paper. 73 Table B.1 Incremental SRISKLRMES-C Panel A reports the calculation of Incremental SRISKMES-C due to the sensitivity of bank stock returns to Unused C&I Credit Lines using the minimum (gmin) and maximum (gmax) sensitivity from different model specifications shown in prior tables. MES-Cmin (%) is calculated as Liquidity Risk x gmin. MES-Cmin ($) is calculated as Liquidity Risk x gmin x MV. Other variables are calculated accordingly. In Panel B, we show the Conditional SRISK (SRISK-C) which is the sum of Incremental SRISKCL and Incremental SRISKMES-C . All variables are defined in Appendix I. Panel A.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Ramelli, S., and A. F. Wagner, 2020, Feverish stock price reactions to COVID-19. Review of Corporate Finance Studies 9 (3), 622-655.

  49. Repullo, R. 2004. Capital Requirements, Market Power, and Risk-Taking in Banking. Journal of Financial Intermediation 13:156–82.

  50. Saunders, A., A. Spina, S. Steffen, and D. Streitz, 2021, Corporate loan spreads and economic activity, Working Paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Von Thadden, E.-L. 2004. Bank Capital Adequacy Regulation under the New Basel Accord.

  52. We estimate the following regression: !"#$!,#,$ = &% + &&())*+#,#,$ + &'-./0*$ + 1(2),* + 1+2,,* + 3$ + 4- + 5!,#,$ Where ())*+#,#,$ are bank-specific aggregate risk proxies, 2),* (2,,*) are bank (firm) characteristics, 3$ are year and 4- industry fixed effects. 80 The results are reported in Table E.1. We first show that idiosyncratic drawdown risk (measured using a firm’s realized equity volatility over the past 12 months) and systematic drawdown risk (measured using a firm’s stock beta) are priced in both commitment fee (AISU) and spread (AISD). This is consistent with, for example, Acharya et al. (2013) and Berg et al. (2015).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. We measure Liquidity Risk.as undrawn commitments plus wholesale finance minus cash or cash equivalents (all relative to assets) and use a median split to distinguish between banks with Low vs. High Liquidity Risk. Panel A shows the stock prices of both group of banks indexed at Jan 1, 2007, Panel B shows the difference between the stock prices (in percentage point). All variables are defined in Appendix II. 46 Figure 6. Net vs. gross drawdowns This figure shows the time-series of Gross Drawdowns (Panel A) and Net Drawdowns (Panel B) over the Q1 2010 to Q3 2020 period. Gross Drawdowns is the percentage change in a bank’s off balance sheet unused C&I loan commitments (measured during Q1 2020). Net Drawdowns are defined as the change in a bank’s off balance sheet unused C&I loan commitments minus the change in deposits (all measured during Q1 2020) relative to total assets. All variables are defined in Appendix II.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. We use quarterly debt capital structure data from CapitalIQ and investigate changes in different debt capital structure components during Q4 2019 and Q4 2020 (Table A.1) and quarterly from Q4 2019 to Q3 2020 (Table A.2). Specifically, we inspect the following: drawn credit lines (Drawn CL/Assets), credit line usage (Drawn CL/(Drawn CL + Undrawn CL)), bond debt (Bonds /Assets), term loans (Term loans/Assets), total debt (Total Debt / Assets), and preference for cash (Cash / (Cash + Undrawn CL)).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Monetary stimulus and bank lending. (2020). Chakraborty, Indraneel ; MacKinlay, Andrew ; Goldstein, Itay.
    In: Journal of Financial Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:136:y:2020:i:1:p:189-218.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Shock Contagion, Asset Quality and Lending Behavior. (2018). Tsapin, Andriy ; Talavera, Oleksandr ; Pham, Tho.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ukb:wpaper:01/2018.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Shock propaganda, asset quality and lending behaviour. (2018). .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:swn:wpaper:2018-04..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Shock propaganda, asset quality and lending behaviour. (2018). Tsapin, Andriy ; Talavera, Oleksandr ; Pham, Tho.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:swn:wpaper:2018-04.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Are financial ratios relevant for trading credit risk? Evidence from the CDS market. (2018). Chalamandaris, George ; Vlachogiannakis, Nikos E.
    In: Annals of Operations Research.
    RePEc:spr:annopr:v:266:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-016-2373-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Ownership Structure and Bank Risk: The Effects of Crisis, Market Discipline and Regulatory Pressure. (2018). Tran, Dung ; Hassan, M. Kabir ; Houston, Reza.
    In: NFI Working Papers.
    RePEc:nfi:nfiwps:2018-wp-03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Deposit Rate Advantages at the Largest Banks. (2018). Jacewitz, Stefan ; Pogach, Jonathan.
    In: Journal of Financial Services Research.
    RePEc:kap:jfsres:v:53:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10693-016-0261-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Liquidity, Synergy and Winner-take-all Effect. (2018). Sun, Mingyuan.
    In: International Journal of Financial Research.
    RePEc:jfr:ijfr11:v:9:y:2018:i:1:p:147-162.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Risk in Islamic banking and corporate governance. (2018). Safiullah, MD ; Shamsuddin, Abul.
    In: Pacific-Basin Finance Journal.
    RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:47:y:2018:i:c:p:129-149.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Macroprudential policy and bank risk. (2018). Gambacorta, Leonardo ; Binici, Mahir ; Altunbas, Yener.
    In: Journal of International Money and Finance.
    RePEc:eee:jimfin:v:81:y:2018:i:c:p:203-220.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. The joint regulation of bank liquidity and bank capital. (2018). TARAZI, Amine ; De Young, Robert ; Distinguin, Isabelle ; Deyoung, Robert.
    In: Journal of Financial Intermediation.
    RePEc:eee:jfinin:v:34:y:2018:i:c:p:32-46.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Bank liquidity creation and recessions. (2018). Chatterjee, Ujjal K.
    In: Journal of Banking & Finance.
    RePEc:eee:jbfina:v:90:y:2018:i:c:p:64-75.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Bank funding costs in a rising interest rate environment. (2018). Uysal, Pinar ; Mora, Nada ; Gerlach, Jeffrey R.
    In: Journal of Banking & Finance.
    RePEc:eee:jbfina:v:87:y:2018:i:c:p:164-186.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. The consequences of liquidity imbalance: When net lenders leave interbank markets. (2018). Hryckiewicz, Aneta ; Kozlowski, Lukasz.
    In: Journal of Financial Stability.
    RePEc:eee:finsta:v:36:y:2018:i:c:p:82-97.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Funding liquidity risk and internal markets in multi-bank holding companies: Diversification or internalization?. (2018). Ly, Kim Cuong ; Shimizu, Katsutoshi.
    In: International Review of Financial Analysis.
    RePEc:eee:finana:v:57:y:2018:i:c:p:77-89.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Systemic liquidity concept, measurement and macroprudential instruments. (2018). Wedow, Michael ; Schmitz, Stefan ; Lamas, Matías ; Duijm, Patty ; Budnik, Katarzyna ; Bonner, Clemens ; Force, Ecb Task.
    In: Occasional Paper Series.
    RePEc:ecb:ecbops:2018214.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Systematic Risk, Bank Moral Hazard, and Bailouts. (2018). moretto, michele ; Parigi, Bruno Maria ; Lucchetta, Marcella.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_6878.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Systematic risk, bank moral hazard, and bailouts. (2018). moretto, michele ; Parigi, Bruno M ; Lucchetta, Marcella.
    In: Research Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:bof:bofrdp:2018_002.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Bank solvency risk and funding cost interactions in a small open economy: evidence from Korea. (2018). Park, Kyounghoon ; Aldasoro, Iñaki.
    In: BIS Working Papers.
    RePEc:bis:biswps:738.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Suppliers as liquidity insurers. (2017). Gropp, Reint ; Corsten, Daniel ; Markou, Panos .
    In: IWH Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:iwhdps:82017.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Banking Crises and Investments in Innovation. (2017). Peia, Oana.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ucn:wpaper:201727.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Regulacyjne granice stabilnosci depozytow gospodarstw domowych. (2017). Kochaniak, Katarzyna.
    In: Problemy Zarzadzania.
    RePEc:sgm:pzwzuw:v:15:i:66:y:2017:p:37-52.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. The effect of monetary policy on bank wholesale funding. (2017). Choi, Dong Beom.
    In: Staff Reports.
    RePEc:fip:fednsr:759.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. System stress testing of bank liquidity risk. (2017). Tsionas, Mike ; Topaloglou, Nikolas ; Pagratis, Spyros .
    In: Journal of International Money and Finance.
    RePEc:eee:jimfin:v:73:y:2017:i:pa:p:22-40.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Bank loan supply responses to Federal Reserve emergency liquidity facilities. (2017). Berger, Allen N ; Dlugosz, Jennifer ; Black, Lamont K.
    In: Journal of Financial Intermediation.
    RePEc:eee:jfinin:v:32:y:2017:i:c:p:1-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. How do insured deposits affect bank risk? Evidence from the 2008 Emergency Economic Stabilization Act. (2017). Noth, Felix ; Lambert, Claudia ; Schuwer, Ulrich.
    In: Journal of Financial Intermediation.
    RePEc:eee:jfinin:v:29:y:2017:i:c:p:81-102.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Funding liquidity and bank risk taking. (2017). Wu, Eliza ; Scheule, Harald ; Khan, Muhammad Saifuddin .
    In: Journal of Banking & Finance.
    RePEc:eee:jbfina:v:82:y:2017:i:c:p:203-216.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Bank liquidity creation and real economic output. (2017). Sedunov, John ; Berger, Allen N.
    In: Journal of Banking & Finance.
    RePEc:eee:jbfina:v:81:y:2017:i:c:p:1-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Why do banks choose to finance with equity?. (2017). Sorokina, Nonna Y ; Patel, Ajay ; Thornton, John H.
    In: Journal of Financial Stability.
    RePEc:eee:finsta:v:30:y:2017:i:c:p:36-52.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Risk pricing of wholesale funds and the behavior of retail deposit rates. (2017). Kishan, Ruby P ; Opiela, Timothy P.
    In: The North American Journal of Economics and Finance.
    RePEc:eee:ecofin:v:42:y:2017:i:c:p:668-681.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Dual market competition and deposit rate setting in Islamic and conventional banks. (2017). TARAZI, Amine ; Risfandy, Tastaftiyan ; Meslier, Celine.
    In: Economic Modelling.
    RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:63:y:2017:i:c:p:318-333.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Why and how do banks lay off credit risk? The choice between retention, loan sales and credit default swaps. (2017). Beyhaghi, Mehdi ; Saunders, Anthony ; Massoud, Nadia.
    In: Journal of Corporate Finance.
    RePEc:eee:corfin:v:42:y:2017:i:c:p:335-355.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Government guarantees and financial stability. (2017). leonello, agnese ; Carletti, Elena ; Goldstein, Itay ; Allen, Franklin.
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ecb:ecbwps:20172032.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Macroprudential policy and bank risk. (2017). Gambacorta, Leonardo ; Binici, Mahir ; Altunbas, Yener.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:12138.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Macroprudential policy and bank risk. (2017). Gambacorta, Leonardo ; Binici, Mahir ; Altunbas, Yener.
    In: BIS Working Papers.
    RePEc:bis:biswps:646.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Traditional and Shadow Banks during the Crisis. (2017). Chretien, E ; Lyonnet, V.
    In: Débats économiques et financiers.
    RePEc:bfr:decfin:27.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. The Bank Lending Channel and the Market for Banks Wholesale Funding. (2016). Scharler, Johann ; Breitenlechner, Maximilian .
    In: Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change.
    RePEc:zbw:vfsc16:145679.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Measuring Liquidity Mismatch in the Banking Sector. (2016). Bai, Jennie ; Krishnamurthy, Arvind ; Weymuller, Charles-Henri .
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:22729.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. The Deposits Channel of Monetary Policy. (2016). Schnabl, Philipp ; Savov, Alexi ; Drechsler, Itamar.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:22152.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. High value household deposits in the Eurozone: single post-crisis approach vs. national facts. (2016). Kochaniak, Katarzyna.
    In: Bank i Kredyt.
    RePEc:nbp:nbpbik:v:47:y:2016:i:6:p:529-552.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Does government intervention affect banking globalization?. (2016). Wieladek, Tomasz ; Rose, Andrew ; Kleymenova, Anya .
    In: Journal of the Japanese and International Economies.
    RePEc:eee:jjieco:v:42:y:2016:i:c:p:146-161.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. How do banks make the trade-offs among risks? The role of corporate governance. (2016). Chen, Hsiao-Jung ; Lin, Kuan-Ting .
    In: Journal of Banking & Finance.
    RePEc:eee:jbfina:v:72:y:2016:i:s:p:s39-s69.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Banks’ external financing costs and the bank lending channel: Results from a SVAR analysis. (2016). Sindermann, Friedrich ; Scharler, Johann ; Breitenlechner, Max.
    In: Journal of Financial Stability.
    RePEc:eee:finsta:v:26:y:2016:i:c:p:228-246.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. U.S. BANK LENDING ACTIVITY IN THE POSTCRISIS WORLD. (2016). Cyree, Ken B ; Winters, Drew B ; Griffiths, Mark D.
    In: Journal of Financial Research.
    RePEc:bla:jfnres:v:39:y:2016:i:4:p:389-410.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Depositors’ Perception of Too-Big-to-Fail. (2015). Raquel de F. Oliveira, ; Lucas A. B. de C. Barros, ; Schiozer, Rafael F..
    In: Review of Finance.
    RePEc:oup:revfin:v:19:y:2015:i:1:p:191-227..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Banks’ Internal Capital Markets and Deposit Rates. (2015). Palvia, Ajay ; Ben-David, Itzhak ; Spatt, Chester.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:21526.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. The Information Content of Monetary Statistics for the Great Recession: Evidence from Germany. (2015). Nautz, Dieter ; Chen, Wenjuan.
    In: SFB 649 Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2015-027.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Market discipline by bank creditors during the 2008–2010 crisis. (2015). Bennett, Rosalind ; Kwast, Myron L ; Hwa, Vivian .
    In: Journal of Financial Stability.
    RePEc:eee:finsta:v:20:y:2015:i:c:p:51-69.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Bank loans for private and public firms in a liquidity crunch. (2015). Allen, Jason ; Paligorova, Teodora.
    In: Journal of Financial Stability.
    RePEc:eee:finsta:v:18:y:2015:i:c:p:106-116.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Emergency Liquidity Facilities, Signalling and Funding Costs. (2015). Perez Saiz, Hector ; Lehar, Alfred ; Souissi, Moez ; Gauthier, Celine .
    In: Staff Working Papers.
    RePEc:bca:bocawp:15-44.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-22 18:25:55 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.