- (a) Employment status Share (1) Employed full-time 45.9 Employed part-time 10.7 Marginal/Irregular 1.7 Non-employed 12.6 Retired 23.5 Student 5.6 (b) Country of residence Share (1) France 21.2 Germany 20.5 Italy 21.3 Spain 21.7 Sweden 15.4 (c) Household’s income Share (1) Less than 1250 Euros 13.4 1250-2000 Euros 23.1 2000-4000 Euros 37.9 More than 4000 Euros 17.8 Non-declared 7.8 Notes: These tables refer to the estimation sample. The sample size is 24,089 for employment status, and 33,231 for country of residence and household income.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- A — Data characteristics Table A.1 — Observations per wave Wave Period Response share # Wave 1 Apr-May 2020 100.0 8,063 Wave 2 Jun 2020 59.4 4,788 Wave 3 Aug 2020 69.0 5,565 Wave 4 Nov-Dec 2020 69.4 5,594 Wave 5 Mar 2021 61.4 4,950 Wave 6 Jun 2021 53.0 4,271 Wave 7 Oct-Nov 2021 50.6 4,082 Wave 8 Feb-Mar 2022 45.2 3,644 Notes: This table reports responses statistics by survey wave. Column (1) shows responses as a percentage of the first-wave response figure. Column (2) shows the total number of responses in each wave.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Alesina, Alberto, and Nicola Fuchs-Schuendeln. 2007. “Good Bye Lenin (or not?). The Effect of Communism on People’s Preferences.” American Economic Review 97 (4): 1507–1528. 10.1257/aer.97.4.1507.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Alesina, Alberto, and Paola Giuliano. 2011. “Preferences for Redistribution.” Handbook of Social Economics 1 93–131. 10.1016/B978-0-444-53187-2.00004-8.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Almås, Ingvild, Alexander W. Cappelen, and Bertil Tungodden. 2020. “Cutthroat Capitalism versus Cuddly Socialism: Are Americans More Meritocratic and Efficiency-Seeking than Scandinavians?.” Journal of Political Economy 128 (5): 1753–1788. 10.1086/705551.
Alsharawy, Abdelaziz, Sheryl Ball, Alec Smith, and Ross Spoon. 2021. “Fear of COVID-19 changes economic preferences: evidence from a repeated cross-sectional MTurk survey.” Journal of the Economic Science Association 7 (2): 103–119. 10.1007/s40881-021-00111-x.
Andersson, Ola, Håkan J. Holm, Jean-Robert Tyran, and Erik Wengström. 2016. “Risk Aversion Relates to Cognitive Ability: Preferences Or Noise?.” Journal of the European Economic Association 14 (5): 1129– 1154. 10.1111/jeea.12179.
- Baden, Lindsey R., Hana M. El Sahly, Brandon Essink et al. 2020. “Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine.” New England Journal of Medicine 384 (5): 403–416. 10.1056/NEJMoa2035389.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Benabou, Roland, and Efe A. Ok. 2001. “Social Mobility and the Demand for Redistribution: The Poum Hypothesis.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (2): 447–487. 10.1162/00335530151144078.
Benabou, Roland, and Jean Tirole. 2006. “Belief in a Just World and Redistributive Politics.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 121 (2): 699–746. 10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.699.
- Benjamin, Daniel J., Sebastian A. Brown, and Jesse M. Shapiro. 2013. “Who is ‘Behavioral’? Cognitive Ability and Anomalous Preferences.” Journal of the European Economic Association 11 (6): 1231–1255. 10.1111/jeea.12055.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Besedeš, Tibor, Cary Deck, Sudipta Sarangi, and Mikhael Shor. 2012. “Decision-making strategies and performance among seniors.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 81 (2): 524–533. 10.1016/j. jebo.2011.07.016.
- Brañas Garza, Pablo, Praveen Kujal, and Balint Lenkei. 2019. “Cognitive reflection test: Whom, how, when.” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 82 (2019): 101455. 10.1016/j.socec.2019. 101455.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Brañas Garza, Pablo, Teresa García-Muñoz, and Roberto Hernán González. 2012. “Cognitive effort in the Beauty Contest Game.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 83 (2): 254–260. 10.1016/j.jebo. 2012.05.018.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Brañas-Garza, P., D. Jorrat, A. Alfonso, A. M. Espín, T. García Muñoz, and J. Kovářík. 2022. “Exposure to the COVID-19 pandemic environment and generosity.” Royal Society Open Science 9 (1): 210919. 10.1098/rsos.210919.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Brun, Martín, and Xavier Ramos. 2023. “Preferences for Redistribution and Cognitive Ability.” [Unpublished manuscript]. Department of Applied Economics. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Burks, Stephen V., Jeffrey P. Carpenter, Goette Lorenz, and Rustichini Aldo. 2009. “Cognitive skills affect economic preferences, strategic behavior, and job attachment.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (19): 7745–7750. 10.1073/pnas.0812360106.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Buso, Irene Maria, Sofia De Caprariis, Daniela Di Cagno, Lorenzo Ferrari, Vittorio Larocca, Francesca Marazzi, Luca Panaccione, and Lorenzo Spadoni. 2020. “The effects of COVID-19 lockdown on fairness and cooperation: Evidence from a lablike experiment.” Economics Letters 196 109577. 10.1016/j.econlet. 2020.109577.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Cappelen, Alexander W., Ranveig Falch, Erik Ø. Sørensen, and Bertil Tungodden. 2021. “Solidarity and fairness in times of crisis.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 186 (2021): 1–11. 10.1016/j. jebo.2021.03.017.
Carpenter, Jeffrey, Michael Graham, and Jesse Wolf. 2013. “Cognitive ability and strategic sophistication.” Games and Economic Behavior 80 (2013): 115–130. 10.1016/j.geb.2013.02.012.
- Carroll, John B. 1993. Human Cognitive Abilities. Cambridge University Press, . 10.1017/ CBO9780511571312.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Casoria, Fortuna, Fabio Galeotti, and Marie Claire Villeval. 2023. “Trust and Social Preferences in Times of Acute Health Crisis.” 10.2139/ssrn.4349629, IZA Discussion Paper 15929.
- Colom, Roberto, Francisco J. Abad, Luis F. García, and Manuel Juan-Espinosa. 2002. “Education, Wechsler ’s Full Scale IQ, and g.” Intelligence 30 (5): 449–462. 10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00122-8.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Deary, Ian J., G. David Batty, and Catharine R. Gale. 2008. “Childhood intelligence predicts voter turnout, voting preferences, and political involvement in adulthood: The 1970 British Cohort Study.” Intelligence 36 (6): 548–555. 10.1016/j.intell.2008.09.001.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Dohmen, Thomas, Armin Falk, David Huffman, and Uwe Sunde. 2010. “Are Risk Aversion and Impatience Related to Cognitive Ability?.” American Economic Review 100 (3): 1238–60. 10.1257/aer.100.3.1238.
Durante, Ruben, Louis Putterman, and Joël van der Weele. 2014. “Preferences for Redistribution and Perception of Fairness: An Experimental Study.” Journal of the European Economic Association 12 (4): 1059–1086. 10.1111/jeea.12082.
- Family and friends Social media -.1 -.05 0 .05 .1 Difference high vs. low Notes: This figure plots estimates for the differences in the sources of COVID-19 related information between individuals with CRT scores of 2 and 3 (high score) and those who score 0 and 1 (low score) controlling for socio-demographic characteristics (see the details in Table B.4). Information sources were reported in Feb-Mar 2022. The bars are 95% confidence intervals constructed with robust standard errors.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Fehr, Ernst, Thomas Epper, and Julien Senn. 2022. “Other-Regarding Preferences and Redistributive Politics.
- Ferreira, Francisco H. G., and Vito Peragine. 2016. Oxford Handbook of Well-Being and Public Policy. Chap. Equality of Opportunity: Theory and Evidence, Oxford University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Figure B.2 — CRT scores by categories (a) Country 0 20 40 60 80 100 Population share (%) SE ES IT DE FR Score=0 Score=1 Score=2 Score=3 (b) Educational attainment 0 20 40 60 80 100 Population share (%) Postgraduate University Vocational Secondary Primary Other Score=0 Score=1 Score=2 Score=3 (c) Household income 0 20 40 60 80 100 Population share (%) More than 4000 Euros 2000-4000 Euros 1250-2000 Euros Less than 1250 Euros Score=0 Score=1 Score=2 Score=3 (d) Sex 0 20 40 60 80 100 Population share (%) Female Male Score=0 Score=1 Score=2 Score=3 Notes: These figures plot CRT score shares for each category in the expanded sample. Figure B.3 — CRT scores by household income.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Frederick, Shane. 2005. “Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (4): 25–42. 10.1257/089533005775196732.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- García-Castro, Juan Diego, Rosa Rodríguez-Bailˊ øn, and Guillermo B. Willis. 2020. “Perceiving economic inequality in everyday life decreases tolerance to inequality.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 90 104019. 10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104019.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Gärtner, Manja, Johanna Mollerstrom, and David Seim. 2017. “Individual risk preferences and the demand for redistribution.” Journal of Public Economics 153 49–55. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.06.009.
Grimalda, Gianluca, Nancy R. Buchan, Orgul D. Ozturk, Adriana C. Pinate, Giulia Urso, and Marilynn B. Brewer. 2021. “Exposure to COVID-19 is associated with increased altruism, particularly at the local level.” Scientific Reports 11 (18950): 1–14. 10.1038/s41598-021-97234-2.
- Guterres, António. 2020. “Secretary-General Remarks on COVID-19: A Call for Solidarity.” March 19, 2020.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hoppe, Eva I., and David J. Kusterer. 2011. “Behavioral biases and cognitive reflection.” Economics Letters 110 (2): 97–100. 10.1016/j.econlet.2010.11.015.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kahneman, D., and S. Frederick. 2002. Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Chap. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment 49–81, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kerschbamer, Rudolf, and Daniel Müller. 2020. “Social preferences and political attitudes: An online experiment on a large heterogeneous sample.” Journal of Public Economics 182 104076. 10.1016/j.jpubeco. 2019.104076.
Kuhn, Andreas. 2019. “The subversive nature of inequality: Subjective inequality perceptions and attitudes to social inequality.” European Journal of Political Economy 59 331–344. 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2019. 04.004.
- Lapidus, Nathanael, Juliette Paireau, Daniel Levy-Bruhl et al. 2021. “Do not neglect SARS-CoV-2 hospitalization and fatality risks in the middle-aged adult population.” Infectious Diseases Now 51 (4): 380–382. 10.1016/j.idnow.2020.12.007.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Le Vu, Stéphane, Gabrielle Jones, François Anna et al. 2021. “Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in France: results from nationwide serological surveillance.” Nature Communications 12 (3025): 1–7. 10. 1038/s41467-021-23233-6.
Lohmann, Paul M., Elisabeth Gsottbauer, Jing You, and Andreas Kontoleon. 2023. “Anti-social behaviour and economic decision-making: Panel experimental evidence in the wake of COVID-19.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 206 136–171. 10.1016/j.jebo.2022.12.007.
- Menachemi, Nir, Brian E. Dixon, Kara K. Wools-Kaloustian, Constantin T. Yiannoutsos, and Paul K. Halverson. 2021. “How Many SARS-CoV-2-Infected People Require Hospitalization? Using Random Sample Testing to Better Inform Preparedness Efforts.” Journal of Public Health Management and Practice : JPHMP 27 (3): 246–250. 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001331.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Mollerstrom, Johanna, and David Seim. 2014. “Cognitive Ability and the Demand for Redistribution.” PLoS ONE 9 (10): e109955. 10.1371/journal.pone.0109955.
- More careful first Equal Vulnerability+Carefulness Vulnerability Notes: These figures plot the response shares for preferences for vaccine distribution by CRT test scores. CRT scores were measured in August 2020. Preferences for vaccine distribution were measured in March 2021. The sample size is 4,317.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Musgrave, Richard. 1959. The Theory of Public Finance. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Oechssler, Jörg, Andreas Roider, and Patrick W. Schmitz. 2009. “Cognitive abilities and behavioral biases.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 72 (1): 147–152. 10.1016/j.jebo.2009.04.018.
- Own Others Notes: This figure plots estimates for the differences in the assigned probabilities for COVID-19 outcomes between individuals with CRT scores of 2 and 3 (high score) and those who score 0 and 1 (low score) controlling for socio-demographic characteristics (see the details in Table B.4). Probabilities were reported in August 2020. ‘Own’ refers to the probabilities for the respondent catching COVID-19. ‘Others’ refer to probabilities assigned to the general population. The bars are 95% confidence intervals constructed with robust standard errors. (b) Information sources for COVID-19 pandemic Mass media Government Health prof.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Pignataro, Giuseppe. 2012. “Equality of opportunity: Policy and measurement paradigms.” Journal of Economic Surveys 26 (5): 800–834. 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2011.00679.x. Piketty, Thomas. 1995. “Social Mobility and Redistributive Politics.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (3): 551–584. 10.2307/2946692.
- Polack, Fernando P., Stephen J. Thomas, Nicholas Kitchin et al. 2020. “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.” New England Journal of Medicine 383 (27): 2603–2615. 10.1056/ NEJMoa2034577.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Potrafke, Niklas. 2019. “Risk aversion, patience and intelligence: Evidence based on macro data.” Economics Letters 178 (2019): 116–120. 10.1016/j.econlet.2019.02.026.
Ramos, Xavier, and Dirk Van de Gaer. 2016. “Approaches to inequality of opportunity: Principles, measures and evidence.” Journal of Economic Surveys 30 (5): 855–883. 10.1111/joes.12121.
- Rehm, Philipp. 2009. “Risks and Redistribution: An Individual-Level Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (7): 855–881. 10.1177/0010414008330595.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Roemer, J.E., and A. Trannoy. 2015. Handbook of Income Distribution. Chap. Equality of opportunity 217– 300, North-Holland.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Sadoff, Jerald, Glenda Gray, An Vandebosch et al. 2021. “Safety and Efficacy of Single-Dose Ad26.COV2.S Vaccine against Covid-19.” New England Journal of Medicine 384 (23): 2187–2201. 10.1056/ NEJMoa2101544.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Salje, Henrik, Cécile Tran Kiem, Noémie Lefrancq et al. 2020. “Estimating the burden of SARS-CoV-2 in France.” Science 369 (6500): 208–211. 10.1126/science.abc3517.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Shachat, Jason, Matthew J. Walker, and Lijia Wei. 2021. “How the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic impacted pro-social behaviour and individual preferences: Experimental evidence from China.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 190 480–494. 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.08.001.
- Sirota, Miroslav, and Marie Juanchich. 2018. “Effect of response format on cognitive reflection: Validating a two- and four-option multiple choice question version of the Cognitive Reflection Test.” Behavior Research Methods 50 (6): 2511–2522. 10.3758/s13428-018-1029-4.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- The assigned probabilities for the COVID-19 outcomes were measured in August 2020. Robust standard errors appear in parentheses. ∗ p < 0.10, ∗∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗∗ p < 0.01. The Wald test statistics for the equality of the High_CA coefficient to that in the main specification are reported, with the associated p-values.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- The Top 10 responses for each question attracted 93%, 94.6%, and 90.5% of the total, respectively. A common ambivalence in CRT tests is the response 0.05 cents in question 1, as participants mistake the unit of answer (Cents) for Dollars (Sirota and Juanchich, 2018). In our data, a non-negligible share of answers for question 1 make this unit-of-answer mistake. Note that the top 6 responses are variations of 10 and 5 cents, using different decimal position.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Troiano, G., and A. Nardi. 2021. “Vaccine hesitancy in the era of COVID-19.” Public Health 194 245–251. 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.02.025.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Trump, Kris-Stella. 2018. “Income Inequality Influences Perceptions of Legitimate Income Differences.” British Journal of Political Science 48 (4): 929–952. 10.1017/S0007123416000326.
Tyran, Jean-Robert, and Rupert Sausgruber. 2006. “A little fairness may induce a lot of redistribution in democracy.” European Economic Review 50 (2): 469–485. 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.09.014.
Ver Eecke, W. 2003. “Adam Smith and Musgrave’s concept of merit good.” Journal of Socio-Economics 31 (6): 701–720. 10.1016/S1053-5357(02)00144-0.
- Voysey, Merryn, Sue Ann Costa Clemens, Shabir A. Madhi et al. 2021. “Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: an interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK.” Lancet 397 (10269): 99–111. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20) 32661-1.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Watson, Oliver J., Gregory Barnsley, Jaspreet Toor, Alexandra B. Hogan, Peter Winskill, and Azra C. Ghani. 2022. “Global impact of the first year of COVID-19 vaccination: a mathematical modelling study.” Lancet Infectious Diseases 22 (9): 1293–1302. 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00320-6.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Within people aged 25-60 and fully employed 0 20 40 60 80 100 Population share (%) More than 4000 Euros 2000-4000 Euros 1250-2000 Euros Less than 1250 Euros Non-declared Score=0 Score=1 Score=2 Score=3 Notes: These figures plot CRT score shares for income categories. Only fully-employed individuals aged between 25 and 60 are considered.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Zhang, Don C., Scott Highhouse, and Thaddeus B. Rada. 2016. “Explaining sex differences on the Cognitive Reflection Test.” Personality and Individual Differences 101 (2016): 425–427. 10.1016/j.paid.2016. 06.034.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now