[go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
A Demand-Side Perspective on Developing a Future Electricity Generation Mix: Identifying Heterogeneity in Social Preferences. (2017). Lee, Chul-Yong ; Huh, Sung-Yoon.
In: Energies.
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:8:p:1127-:d:106550.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 5

Citations received by this document

Cites: 53

References cited by this document

Cocites: 25

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Segmenting the South Korean Public According to Their Preferred Direction for Electricity Mix Reform. (2020). Lee, Jin Won ; Roh, Seungkook ; Li, Qingchang.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9053-:d:437789.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. What Do Potential Residents Really Want When Hosting a Nuclear Power Plant? An Empirical Study of Economic Incentives in South Korea. (2019). Lee, Chul-Yong ; Woo, Jongroul ; Huh, Sung-Yoon.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:7:p:1199-:d:217768.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Social acceptance of offshore wind energy development in South Korea: Results from a choice experiment survey. (2019). Yoo, Seung-Hoon ; Kim, Ju-Hee.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:113:y:2019:i:c:37.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Strategic management of residential electric services in the competitive market: Demand-oriented perspective. (2018). Altmann, Jörn.
    In: Energy & Environment.
    RePEc:sae:engenv:v:29:y:2018:i:1:p:49-66.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Financial Feasibility and Social Acceptance for Reducing Nuclear Power Plants: A Contingent Valuation Study. (2018). Lee, Yong-Gil ; Lim, Sesil ; Woo, Jongroul ; Huh, Sung-Yoon.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:3833-:d:177675.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Aguilera, R.F. The role of natural gas in a low carbon Asia Pacific. Appl. Energy 2014, 113, 1795–1800. [CrossRef]

  2. Ahn, J.; Woo, J.; Lee, J. Optimal allocation of energy sources for sustainable development in South Korea: Focus on the electric power generation industry. Energy Policy 2015, 78, 78–90. [CrossRef]

  3. Augutis, J.; Martišauskas, L.; Krikštolaitis, R. Energy mix optimization from an energy security perspective. Energy Conv. Manag. 2015, 90, 300–314. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  4. Awerbuch, S. Portfolio-based electricity generation planning: Policy implications for renewables and energy security. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 2006, 11, 693–710. [CrossRef]

  5. Bhattacharya, A.; Kojima, S. Power sector investment risk and renewable energy: A Japanese case study using portfolio risk optimization method. Energy Policy 2012, 40, 69–80. [CrossRef]

  6. Biegler, T. The Hidden Costs of Electricity: Externalities of Power Generation in Australia; The Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering: Parkville, Australia, 2009. Energies 2017, 10, 1127 17 of 19
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Bloomberg New Energy Finance. Levelized Cost of Electricity Update: H1 2016. 2016. Available online: https://about.bnef.com/ (accessed on 27 July 2017).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  8. Borchers, A.M.; Duke, J.M.; Parsons, G.R. Does willingness to pay for green energy differ by source? Energy Policy 2007, 35, 3327–3334. [CrossRef]

  9. Bronfman, N.C.; Jimenez, R.B.; Arevalo, P.C.; Cifuentes, L.A. Understanding social acceptance of electricity generation sources. Energy Policy 2012, 46, 246–252. [CrossRef]

  10. Byun, H.; Lee, C.Y. Analyzing Korean consumers’ latent preferences for electricity generation sources with a hierarchical Bayesian logit model in a discrete choice experiment. Energy Policy 2017, 105, 294–302. [CrossRef]

  11. Cabello, J.M.; Luque, M.; Miguel, F.; Ruiz, A.B.; Ruiz, F. A multiobjective interactive approach to determine the optimal electricity mix in Andalucía (Spain). Top 2014, 22, 109–127. [CrossRef]

  12. Chen, X.; Peterson, M.N.; Hull, V.; Lu, C.; Lee, G.D.; Hong, D.; Liu, J. Effects of attitudinal and sociodemographic factors on pro-environmental behavior in urban China. Environ. Conserv. 2011, 38, 45–52. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Commission for Environment Cooperation. North American Power Plant Air Emissions. 2011. Available online: http://www3.cec.org/islandora/en/item/10236-north-american-power-plant-air-emissions-en.pdf (accessed on 27 July 2017).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  14. Contu, D.; Strazzera, E.; Mourato, S. Modeling individual preferences for energy sources: The case of IV generation nuclear energy in Italy. Ecol. Econ. 2016, 127, 37–58. [CrossRef]

  15. Ebright, R. Nuclear Power: An Environmental Friendly, Clean, Reliable and Safe Electrical Power Source for Today and for the Future. 2011. Available online: https://energy.nd.edu/assets/37714/ebright_slides_02_ 21_20112.pdf (accessed on 27 July 2017).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  16. Foley, A.M.; Gallachóir, B.Ó.; Hur, J.; Baldick, R.; McKeogh, E.J. A strategic review of electricity systems models. Energy 2010, 35, 4522–4530. [CrossRef]

  17. Geem, Z.W.; Kim, J.H. Optimal energy mix with Renewable Portfolio Standards in Korea. Sustainability 2016, 8, 423. [CrossRef]

  18. Goett, A.A.; Hudson, K.; Train, K.E. Customers’ choice among retail energy suppliers: The willingness-to-pay for service attributes. Energy J. 2000, 21, 1–28. [CrossRef]

  19. Gracia, A.; Barreiro-Hurle, J.; Perez, L.P. Can renewable energy be financed with higher electricity prices? Evidence from a Spanish region. Energy Policy 2012, 50, 784–794. [CrossRef]

  20. Grösche, P.; Schröder, C. Eliciting public support for greening the electricity mix using random parameter techniques. Energy Econ. 2011, 33, 363–370. [CrossRef]

  21. Greene, W.H.; Hensher, D.A. A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: Contrasts with mixed logit. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 2003, 37, 681–698. [CrossRef]

  22. Heo, E. Global energy environment change and issues in Korea’s future energy mix. Korean Energy Econ. Rev. 2011, 10, 187–205. (In Korean)
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  23. Huang, Y.H.; Wu, J.H. A portfolio risk analysis on electricity supply planning. Energy Policy 2008, 36, 627–641. [CrossRef]

  24. Huh, S.Y.; Woo, J.; Lim, S.; Lee, Y.G.; Kim, C.S. What do customers want from improved residential electricity services? Evidence from a choice experiment. Energy Policy 2015, 85, 410–420. [CrossRef]

  25. International Energy Agency. Projected Costs of Generating Electricity, 2015th ed.; OECD: Paris, France, 2015.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  26. Kaenzig, J.; Heinzle, S.L.; Wustenhagen, R. Whatever the customer wants, the customer gets? Exploring the gap between consumer preferences and default electricity products in Germany. Energy Policy 2013, 53, 311–322. [CrossRef] Energies 2017, 10, 1127 18 of 19

  27. Kim, Y.; Kim, W.; Kim, M. An international comparative analysis of public acceptance of nuclear energy. Energy Policy 2014, 66, 475–483. [CrossRef]

  28. Korea Electric Power Corporation. The Monthly Report on Major Electric Power Statistics; Korea Electric Power Corporation: Naju, Korea, 2016. (In Korean)
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Korea Power Exchange. Power Market Statistics in 2015; Korea Power Exchange: Naju, Korea, 2016. (In Korean) Energies 2017, 10, 1127 19 of 19
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Korean Government Ministry of Trade Industry and Energy (MOTIE). The 7th Basic Plan of Long-Term Electricity Supply and Demand; MOTIE: Sejong, Korea, 2015. (In Korean)
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Lee, C.Y. Forecasting Price for the Renewable Energy Certificate in South Korea; Korea Energy Economics Institute: Ulsan, Korea, 2015. (In Korean)
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Magidson, J.; Vermunt, J.K. Latent class models for clustering: A comparison with K-means. Can. J. Mark. Res. 2002, 20, 37–44.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. National Energy Technology Laboratory. Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Natural Gas and Power Production. 2015. Available online: https://www.eia.gov/conference/2015/pdf/presentations/skone.pdf (accessed on 27 July 2017).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Orme, B. Formulating Attributes and Levels in Conjoint Analysis; Sawtooth Software: Washington, DC, USA, 2002. 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  35. Purwanto, W.W.; Pratama, Y.W.; Nugroho, Y.S.; Warjito; Hertono, G.F.; Hartono, D.; Deendarlianto; Tezuka, T. Multi-objective optimization model for sustainable Indonesian electricity system: Analysis of economic, environment, and adequacy of energy sources. Renew. Energy 2015, 81, 308–318. [CrossRef]

  36. Rentizelas, A.; Georgakellos, D. Incorporating life cycle external cost in optimization of the electricity generation mix. Energy Policy 2014, 65, 134–149. [CrossRef]

  37. Ryu, H.; Dorjragchaa, S.; Kim, Y.; Kim, K. Electricity-generation mix considering energy security and carbon emission mitigation: Case of Korea and Mongolia. Energy 2014, 64, 1071–1079. [CrossRef]

  38. Shin, J.; Woo, J.; Huh, S.Y.; Lee, J.; Jeong, G. Analyzing public preferences and increasing acceptability for the Renewable Portfolio Standard in Korea. Energy Econ. 2014, 42, 17–26. [CrossRef]

  39. Sithole, H.; Cockerill, T.T.; Hughes, K.J.; Ingham, D.B.; Ma, L.; Porter, R.T.J.; Pourkashanian, M. Developing an optimal electricity generation mix for the UK 2050 future. Energy 2016, 100, 363–373. [CrossRef]

  40. So, J. A Study on Economics of Solar and Wind Power Generation with Emphasis on Grid Stability; Korea Energy Economics Institute: Ulsan, Korea, 2014. (In Korean)
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  41. Tahir, A.C.; Bañares-Alcántara, R. A knowledge representation model for the optimisation of electricity generation mixes. Appl. Energy 2012, 97, 77–83. [CrossRef]

  42. Thangavelu, S.R.; Khambadkone, A.M.; Karimi, I.A. Long-term optimal energy mix planning towards high energy security and low GHG emission. Appl. Energy 2015, 154, 959–969. [CrossRef]

  43. Train, K.E. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, 3rd ed.; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2009.

  44. Van Putten, M.; Lijesen, M.; Ozel, T.; Vink, N.; Wevers, H. Valuing the preferences for micro-generation of renewables by househoulds. Energy 2014, 71, 596–604. [CrossRef]

  45. Van Rijnsoever, F.J.; Van Mossel, A.; Broecks, K.P.F. Public acceptance of energy technologies: The effects of labeling, time, and heterogeneity in a discrete choice experiment. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 45, 817–829. [CrossRef]

  46. Vazhayil, J.P.; Balasubramanian, R. Optimization of India’s electricity generation portfolio using intelligent Pareto-search genetic algorithm. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2014, 55, 13–20. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  47. Verbruggen, A. Renewable and nuclear power: A common future? Energy Policy 2008, 36, 4036–4047. [CrossRef]

  48. Vidal-Amaro, J.J.; Østergaard, P.A.; Sheinbaum-Pardo, C. Optimal energy mix for transitioning from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources: The case of the Mexican electricity system. Appl. Energy 2015, 150, 80–96. [CrossRef]

  49. Weinzettel, J.; Havránek, M.; Scasny, M. A consumption-based indicator of the external costs of electricity. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 17, 68–76. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  50. Welsch, H.; Biermann, P. Electricity supply preferences in Europe: Evidence from subjective well-being data. Resour. Energy Econ. 2014, 38, 38–60. [CrossRef]

  51. Willis, K.; Scarpa, R.; Gilroy, R.; Hamza, N. Renewable energy adoption in an ageing population: Heterogeneity in preferences for micro-generation technology adoption. Energy Policy 2011, 39, 6021–6029. [CrossRef]

  52. Yoo, J.; Ready, R.C. Preference heterogeneity for renewable energy technology. Energy Econ. 2014, 42, 101–114. [CrossRef]

  53. Zhu, Q.; Zhang, Z. On using individual characteristics in the MNL latent class conjoint analysis: An empirical comparison of the nested approach versus the regression approach. Mark. Bull. 2009, 20, 1–12.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Polymeric Membranes for H 2 S and CO 2 Removal from Natural Gas for Hydrogen Production: A Review. (2023). Winston, W S ; Han, Yang ; Prasad, Babul ; Rao, Shraavya.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:15:p:5713-:d:1207136.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Leakage Analysis and Hazardous Boundary Determination of Buried Gas Pipeline Considering Underground Adjacent Confined Space. (2022). Liang, Haibin ; Liu, Yongbin ; Wang, Zhixue ; Chen, Shuangqing ; Du, Hua ; Zhang, Jina ; Bu, Fanxi ; Xu, Zhe.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:18:p:6859-:d:919308.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Natural gas trade network of countries and regions along the belt and road: Where to go in the future?. (2021). Liu, Guixian ; Dong, Kangyin ; Jiang, Qingzhe.
    In: Resources Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:71:y:2021:i:c:s0301420720310096.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Evaluating British Columbias economic policies for liquefied natural gas development. (2021). Werker, Eric ; Markey, Sean ; Gunton, Cameron.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:151:y:2021:i:c:s0301421520304389.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Navigating transfer pricing risk in the oil and gas sector: Essential elements of a policy framework for Trinidad and Tobago and Guyana. (2021). Rajkumar, Antonio ; Charles, Don ; McLean, Sheldon.
    In: Studies and Perspectives – ECLAC Subregional Headquarters for The Caribbean.
    RePEc:ecr:col033:46657.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Combining STRIPAT model and gated recurrent unit for forecasting nature gas consumption of China. (2020). Xiao, Jin ; Hu, YI ; Li, Keying ; Wang, Shouyang.
    In: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.
    RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:25:y:2020:i:7:d:10.1007_s11027-020-09918-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Forecasting China’s Natural Gas Consumption Based on AdaBoost-Particle Swarm Optimization-Extreme Learning Machine Integrated Learning Method. (2018). Gao, Wangfeng ; De, Gejirifu.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:11:p:2938-:d:178746.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Establishing a Framework to Evaluate the Effect of Energy Countermeasures Tackling Climate Change and Air Pollution: The Example of China. (2017). Wang, Gehua ; Ou, Xunmin ; Yuan, Jiehui.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:9:p:1555-:d:111500.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. A Demand-Side Perspective on Developing a Future Electricity Generation Mix: Identifying Heterogeneity in Social Preferences. (2017). Lee, Chul-Yong ; Huh, Sung-Yoon.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:8:p:1127-:d:106550.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. A new approach for the comprehensive grading of petroleum reserves in China: Two natural gas examples. (2017). Luo, Dongkun ; Li, Wandi ; Yuan, Jiehui.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:118:y:2017:i:c:p:914-926.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Impacts of emission reduction and external cost on natural gas distribution. (2017). Yang, Xueqin ; Wang, Zhen ; Yu, Zhixin ; Wallin, Fredrik.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:207:y:2017:i:c:p:553-561.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. CO2 separation from offshore natural gas in quiescent and flowing states using 13X zeolite. (2017). Li, W L ; Tao, Z C ; Chen, S J ; Fu, Y ; Zhu, M.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:205:y:2017:i:c:p:1435-1446.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Modelling the natural gas dynamics in the Southern Cone of Latin America. (2017). Chavez-Rodriguez, Mauro F ; Szklo, Alexandre ; Hawkes, Adam ; Seixas, Julia ; Simoes, Sofia ; Dias, Luis.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:201:y:2017:i:c:p:219-239.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. The shale gas revolution: Barriers, sustainability, and emerging opportunities. (2017). Middleton, Richard S ; Viswanathan, Hari S ; Hyman, Jeffrey D ; Gupta, Rajan.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:199:y:2017:i:c:p:88-95.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. An adsorbed gas estimation model for shale gas reservoirs via statistical learning. (2017). Chen, Yuntian ; Liu, Chaoyang ; Zhang, Dongxiao ; Jiang, SU.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:197:y:2017:i:c:p:327-341.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Probabilistic assessment of shale gas production and water demand at Xiuwu Basin in China. (2016). Zeng, Masun ; Yang, Changbing ; Zou, Youqin ; Lan, Yingying ; Wu, Daishe ; Dai, Zhenxue.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:180:y:2016:i:c:p:185-195.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Experimental investigation of CO2 separation by adsorption methods in natural gas purification. (2016). Chen, S J ; Zhu, M ; Tao, Z C ; Huang, Y X ; Fu, Y.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:179:y:2016:i:c:p:329-337.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Study on the impacts of natural gas supply cost on gas flow and infrastructure deployment in China. (2016). Zhang, QI ; Li, Hailong ; Wang, GE.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:162:y:2016:i:c:p:1385-1398.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Policy recommendations to promote shale gas development in China based on a technical and economic evaluation. (2015). Yuan, Jiehui ; Feng, Lianyong ; Xia, Liangyu ; Luo, Dongkun.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:85:y:2015:i:c:p:194-206.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. A review of the technical and economic evaluation techniques for shale gas development. (2015). Yuan, Jiehui ; Feng, Lianyong ; Luo, Dongkun.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:148:y:2015:i:c:p:49-65.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Shale gas and non-aqueous fracturing fluids: Opportunities and challenges for supercritical CO2. (2015). Viswanathan, Hari S. ; Carey, William J. ; Karra, Satish ; Currier, Robert P. ; Middleton, Richard S. ; Kang, Qinjun ; Porter, Mark L. ; Jimenez-Martinez, Joaquin ; Hyman, Jeffrey D..
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:147:y:2015:i:c:p:500-509.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Determinants of Nuclear Energy Consumption in South Asia: Economic and Energy Security Issues. (2015). Zaman, Khalid.
    In: International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy.
    RePEc:eco:journ2:2015-03-25.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Examining the patterns of innovation in low carbon energy science and technology: Publications and patents of Asian emerging economies. (2014). Wong, Chan-Yuan ; Keng, Zi-Xiang ; Mohamad, Zeeda Fatimah ; Azizan, Suzana Ariff .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:73:y:2014:i:c:p:789-802.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. A dynamic analysis on global natural gas trade network. (2014). Ji, Qiang ; Geng, Jiang-Bo ; Fan, Ying.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:132:y:2014:i:c:p:23-33.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-24 03:33:39 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.