Abildtrup, J., Garcia, S., Olsen, S. B., and Stenger, A. (2013). Spatial preference heterogeneity in forest recreation. Ecological Economics, 92(C):67–77.
Adamowicz, W., Boxall, P., Williams, M., and Louviere, J. (1998). Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(1):pp. 64–75.
Bateman, I. and Langford, I. (1997). Non-users’ willingness to pay for a national park: An application and critique of the contingent valuation method. Regional Studies, 31(6):571–582.
Bateman, I. J., Day, B. H., Georgiou, S., and Lake, I. (2006). The aggregation of environmental benefit values: Welfare measures, distance decay and total {WTP}. Ecological Economics, 60(2):450 – 460.
Bateman, I., Langford, I., Nishikawa, N., and Lake, I. (2000). The axford debate revisited: A case study illustrating different approaches to the aggregation of benefits data. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(2):291–302.
Bateman, I., Mace, G., Fezzi, C., Atkinson, G., and Turner, K. (2011). Economic analysis for ecosystem service assessments. Environmental & Resource Economics, 48(2):177–218.
- Blades, M. and Spencer, C. (1987). How do people use maps to navigate through the world? Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 24(3):64–75.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bliemer, M., Rose, J., and Hensher, D. (2009). Constructing efficient stated choice experiments allowing for differences in error variances across subsets of alternatives. Transportation Research Part B, 43(1):19–35.
Brouwer, R., Martin-Ortega, J., and Berbel, R. (2010). Spatial preference heterogeneity: A choice experiment. Land Economics, 86(3).
Campbell, D., Hutchinson, W. G., and Scarpa, R. (2009). Using choice experiments to explore the spatial distribution of willingness to pay for rural landscape improvements. Environment and Planning A, 41(1):97–111.
Campbell, D., Hutchinson, W., and Scarpa, R. (2008). Incorporating discontinuous preferences into the analysis of discrete choice experiments. Environmental and Resource Economics, 41(3):401–417.
Carson, R. T. (1998). Valuation of tropical rainforests: philosophical and practical issues in the use of contingent valuation. Ecological Economics, 24(1):15–29.
Colombo, S. and Hanley, N. (2008). How can we reduce the errors from benefits transfer? an investigation using the choice experiment method. Land Economics, 84(1):128–147.
- Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., and Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Wiley Publishing, 3 edition.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Environmental Benefits Transfer: Methods, Applications and New Directions Benefits Transfer S.I. Bergstrom, J. C., Stoll, J. R., and Randall, A. (1989). Information effects in contingent markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71(3):pp. 685–691.
Georgiou, S., Bateman, I. J., Langford, I. H., and Day, R. J. (2000). Coastal bathing water health risks: developing means of assessing the adequacy of proposals to amend the 1976 ec directive. Risk, Decision and Policy, 5(01):49–68.
Hanemann, W. M. (1984). Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66(3):332–341.
Hanley, N., Bell, D., and Alvarez-Farizo, B. (2003). Valuing the benefits of coastal water quality improvements using contingent and real behaviour. Environmental & Resource Economics, 24(3):273–285.
Hensher, D. and Greene, W. (2003). The mixed logit model: The state of practice. Transportation, 30(2):133–176.
Hoehn, J. P. and Randall, A. (2002). The effect of resource quality information on resource injury perceptions and contingent values. Resource and Energy Economics, 24(1-2):13–31.
Jørgensen, S. L., Olsen, S. B., Ladenburg, J., Martinsen, L., Svenningsen, S. R., and Hasler, B. (2013). Spatially induced disparities in users’ and non-users’ wtp for water quality improvements—testing the effect of multiple substitutes and distance decay. Ecological Economics, 92(C):58–66.
Johnston, R. J. and Duke, J. M. (2007). Willingness to pay for agricultural land preservation and policy process attributes: Does the method matter? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89(4):1098– 1115.
Johnston, R. J. and Duke, J. M. (2009). Informing preservation of multifunctional agriculture when primary research is unavailable: An application of meta-analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(5):1353–1359.
Johnston, R. J., Schultz, E. T., Segerson, K., Besedin, E. Y., and Ramachandran, M. (2012). Enhancing the content validity of stated preference valuation: The structure and function of ecological indicators. Land Economics, 88(1):102–120.
Johnston, R. J., Schultz, E. T., Segerson, K., Besedin, E. Y., and Ramachandran, M. (2013). Stated preferences for intermediate versus final ecosystem services: Disentangling willingness to pay for omitted outcomes. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 42(1).
Johnston, R. J., Segerson, K., Schultz, E. T., Besedin, E. Y., and Ramachandran, M. (2011). Indices of biotic integrity in stated preference valuation of aquatic ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 70(11):1946–1956.
Johnston, R. J., Swallow, S. K., and Bauer, D. M. (2002). Spatial factors and stated preference values for public goods: Considerations for rural land use. Land Economics, 78(4):481–500.
Krinsky, I. and Robb, A. L. (1986). On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 68(4):715–19.
Loomis, J. B. (2000). Vertically summing public good demand curves: An empirical comparison of economic versus political jurisdictions. Land Economics, 76(2):312–321.
- MacEachren, A. M. (2004). How maps work: representation, visualization, and design. The Guilford Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Martin-Ortega, J., Brouwer, R., Ojea, E., and Berbel, J. (2010). Benefit transfer and spatial heterogeneity of preferences in thevaluation of water quality improvements at the river basin level. Fourth World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Meyerhoff, J. (2013). Do turbines in the vicinity of respondents’ residences influence choices among programmes for future wind power generation? Journal of choice modelling, 7(C):58–71.
- Moore, R., Williams, T., Rodriguez, E., and Hepinstall-Cymerman, J. (2013). Using nonmarket valuation to target conservation payments: An example involving georgia’s private forests. Journal of Forestry, 111(4).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Morrison, M. and Bennett, J. W. (2004). Valuing new south wales rivers for use in benefit transfer. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 48(4).
Pate, J. and Loomis, J. (1997). The effect of distance on willingness to pay values: a case study of wetlands and salmon in california. Ecological Economics, 20(3):199–207.
Poe, G. L., Giraud, K. L., and Loomis, J. (2005). Computational methods for measuring the difference of empirical distributions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(2):353–365.
Roe, B., Irwin, E. G., and Morrow-Jones, H. A. (2004). The effects of farmland, farmland preservation, and other neighborhood amenities on housing values and residential growth. Land Economics, 80(1):55–75.
Rolfe, J. and Windle, J. (2012). Distance decay functions for iconic assets: Assessing national values to protect the health of the great barrier reef in australia. Environmental and Resource Economics, 53(3):347–365.
- Rose and Bliemer (2008). Stated preference experimental design strategies, pages 151–179. Elsevier.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Schaafsma, M., Brouwer, R., and Rose, J. (2012). Directional heterogeneity in wtp models for environmental valuation. Ecological Economics, 79(C):21–31.
- Schkade, D. A. and Payne, J. W. (1994). How people respond to contingent valuation questions: A verbal protocol analysis of willingness to pay for an environmental regulation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26(1):88–109.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Sutherland, R. J. and Walsh, R. G. (1985). Effect of distance on the preservation value of water quality. Land Economics, 64(3):281–291.
- Swait, J. and Louviere, J. (1993). The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and comparison of multinomial logit models. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(3):pp. 305–314.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Train, K. (2009). Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.
Yamada, I. and Thill, J.-C. (2003). Enhancing stated preference surveys in transportation research: the contribution of geographic information systems. Transportation Planning and Technology, 26(5):377– 396.
Yao, R. T., Scarpa, R., Turner, J. A., Barnard, T. D., Rose, J. M., Palma, J. H., and Harrison, D. R. (2014). Valuing biodiversity enhancement in new zealand’s planted forests: Socioeconomic and spatial determinants of willingness-to-pay. Ecological Economics, 98(C):90–101.
Zhao, M., Johnston, R., and Schultz, E. (2013). What to value and how? ecological indicator choices in stated preference valuation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 56(1):3–25.