ANDOR, M. .A. , FRONDEL, M. , VANCE, C. (2014) Hypothetische Zahlungsbereitschaft für grünen Strom: Bekundete Präferenzen privater Haushalte für das Jahr 2013. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 15 (4), 1-12.
BATEMAN, I. J. , BURGESS, D. , MATTHEWS, D. I. , (2008) Contrasting NOAA Guidelines with Learning Design Contingent Valuation (LDCV): Preference Learning versus Coherent Arbitrariness. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55, 127-141.
BATEMAN, I. J. , LANGFORD, I. H. (1997) Budget Constraint, Temporal and Ordering Effects in Contingent Valuation Studies. Environment and Planning A 29, 1215-1228.
BISHOP, R. C. , HEBERLEIN, T. A. (1979) Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased? American Journal of Agricultural Economics 61(5), 926-930.
BLUMENSCHEIN, K. , BLOMQUIST, G. C. , JOHANNESSON, M. , HORN, N. , FREEMAN, P. R. (2008) Eliciting Willingness to Pay in the Without Bias: Evidence from a Field Experiment. The Economic Journal 118(525), 114-137.
BLUMENSCHEIN, K. , JOHANNESSON, M. , BLOMQUIST, G. C. , LILJAS, B. , O’CONNOR, R. M. (1998) Experimental Results on Expressed Certainty an Hypothetical Bias in Contingent Valuation. Southern Economic Journal 65(1), 169-177.
BLUMENSCHEIN, K. , JOHANNESSON, M. , YOKOYAMA, K. K. , FREEMAN, P. R. (2001) Hypothetical versus Real Willingness to Pay in the Health Care Sector: Results from a Field Experiment. Journal of Health Economics 20(3), 441-457.
BULTE, E. , GERKING, S. , LIST, L. A. , DE ZEEUW, A. (2005) The Effect of Varying the Causes of Environmental Problems on Stated WTP Values: Evidence from a Field Study. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 49(2), 330-342.
CARLSSON, F. , FRYKBLOM, P., LAGERKVIST, C. J. (2005) Using Cheap Talk as a Test of Validity in Choice Experiments. Economics Letters 89(2), 147-152.
- CARLSSON, F. , MØRKBAK, M. R. , OLSEN, S. B. (2012) The First Time is the Hardest: A Test of Ordering Effects in Choice Experiments. Journal of Choice Modelling 5(2), 19-37.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
CLARK, J. , FRIESEN, L. (2008) The Causes of Order Effects in Contingent Valuation Surveys: an Experimental Investigation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 56(2), 195-206.
CUMMINGS, R. G. , ELLIOT, S. , HARRISON, G. W. , MURPHY, J. (1997) Are Hypothetical Referenda Incentive-Compatible? Journal of Political Economy 105(3), 609-621.
CUMMINGS, R. G. , HARRISON, G. W. , RUTSTRÖM, E. E. (1995) Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive-Compatible? American Economic Review 85(1), 260-266.
CUMMINGS, R. G. , TAYLOR, L. O. (1999) Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method. American Economic Review 89(3), 649-665.
FREW, E. J. , WHYNES, D. K. , WOLSTENHOLME, J. L. (2003) Eliciting Willingness to Pay: Comparing Closed-Ended with Open-Ended and Payment Scale Formats. Medical Decision Making 23(2), 150-159.
FRONDEL, M., VANCE, C. (2010) Fixed, Random, or Something in Between? A Variant of Hausman’s Specification Test for Panel Data Estimators. Economics Letters 107, 327329.
FRONDEL, M., VANCE, C. (2013), Heterogeneity in the Effect of Home Energy Audits: Theory and Evidence. Environmental and Resource Economics 55 (3), 407-418.
GRÖSCHE, P. , SCHRÖDER, C. (2011) Eliciting Public Support for Greening the Electricity Mix Using Random Parameter Techniques. Energy Economics 33 (2), 363-370.
HALSTEAD, J. , LULOFF, A. , STEVENS, T. H. (1992) Protest Bidders in Contingent Valuation. Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 21 (2), 160-169.
HARRISON, G. W. , HARSTAD, R. , RUTSTRÖM, E. E. (2004) Experimental methods and elicitation of values. Experimental Economics 7(2), 123-140.
HARRISON, G. W. , RUTSTRÖM, E. E. (2008) Experimental evidence on the existence of hypothetical bias in value elicitation methods. In: C. Plott and V. L. Smith (eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, Edition 1, Volume 1, Number 5. New York: Elsevier Science.
HARRISON, G. W. (2006) Experimental Evidence on Alternative Environmental Valuation Methods. Environmental and Resource Economics 34 (1), 125-162.
HERRIGES, Joseph A. , KLING, Catherine L. , LIU, Chih-Chen, TOBIAS, Justin (2010) What Are the Consequences of Consequentiality? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 59(1), 67-81.
JOHANNESSON, M. , LILJAS, B. , JOHANSSON, P-O. (1998) An Experimental Comparison of Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Questions and Real Purchase Decisions. Applied Economics 30(5), 643-647.
LANCASTER, K. J. , (1966) A New Approach to Consumer Theory. Journal of Political Economy 74, 132-157.
LANDRY, C. E. , LIST, J. A. (2007) Using Ex Ante Approaches to Obtain Credible Signals for Value in Contingent Markets: Evidence from the Field American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89(2), 420-429.
LIST, J. A. , GALLET, C. A. (2001) What experimental protocol influence disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values? Environmental and Resource Economics 20(3), 241-254.
LIST, J. A. (2001) Do Explicit Warnings Eliminate the Hypothetical Bias in Elicitation Procedures? Evidence from Field Auctions for Sportscards. American Economic Review 91(5), 1498-1507.
LUSK, J. L. (2003) Effects of Cheap Talk on Consumer Willingness-to-pay for Golden Rice. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(4), 840-856.
- MADDALA, G. S. (1983) Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Reprint 1999. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
MENGES, R. , SCHRÖDER, C. , TRAUB, S. (2005) Altruism, Warm Glow and the Willingnessto -Donate for Green Electricity: an Artefactual Field Experiment. Environmental and Resource Economics 31(4), 431-458 .
MURPHY, J. J. , STEVENS, T. , WEATHERHEAD, D. (2005) Is cheap talk effective at eliminating hypothetical bias in a provision point mechanism? Environmental and Resource Economics 30(3), 327-343.
WHITEHEAD, J. C. , CHERRY, T. L. (2007) Willingness to Pay for a Green Energy Program: A Comparison of Ex-ante and Ex-post Hypothetical Bias Mitigation Approaches. Resource and Energy Economics 29(4), 247-261.