[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Microbes Infect. 2011 Sep 10;14(1):17–25. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2011.08.019

Surfactant and its role in the pathobiology of pulmonary infection

Jennifer R Glasser 1, Rama K Mallampalli 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC3247641  NIHMSID: NIHMS331842  PMID: 21945366

Abstract

Pulmonary surfactant is a complex surface-active substance comprised of key phospholipids and proteins that has many essential functions. Surfactant’s unique composition is integrally related to its surface-active properties, its critical role in host defense, and emerging immunomodulatory activities ascribed to surfactant lipids. Together these effector functions provide for lung stability and protection from a barrage of potentially virulent infectious pathogens.

Keywords: Surfactant, collectin, phospholipid, infection

1. Introduction

The human lung is continually exposed to a multitude of various particulates, microorganisms, and gases, all of which potentially could have a detrimental effect on lung homeostasis and vulnerability to infection [1, 2]. Because of its enormous alveolar surface area and constant contact with ambient factors within the environment, the lungs remain the major site of infection [3]. Despite exposure to possible toxins and pathogens during respiration, the frequency of severe lower tract infection and injury is relatively low in healthy individuals [1, 2]. The intrinsic ability of the respiratory system to remain relatively resistant to infection from virulent pathogens is largely due to the effectiveness of the host defense system [1, 2].

Pulmonary host defense structurally consists of the airway and alveolar epithelium that lines the inner surface of the lung acting as a physical barrier to particles and microorganisms that enter the respiratory tract. In particular the airway columnar epithelia cells utilize mucociliary clearance mechanisms to remove invading pathogens and particulate matter. The epithelium also has an auxiliary role by elaborating cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors with the continued goal to clear infection [2]. Other cells, including neutrophils, macrophages, and lymphocytes can be recruited to sites of infection as major bioeffectors involved in the eradication and disposal of pathogens, or, if needed, partake in the adaptive immune response. Epithelial cells also synthesize and secrete a variety of antimicrobial intermediates, peptides, and proteins that can kill microorganisms directly or be used by neutrophils or macrophages to facilitate bacterial clearance [2]. Interestingly, many of these bioactive products released by host cells also interact with surfactant, a major component within the host defense system that has unique properties displaying both lung stabilizing and anti-microbial properties to facilitate clearance of a variety of pathogens.

1.1. Surfactant and its role in lung homeostasis

It has been established that a primary role of surfactant is to lower surface tension in the alveoli thereby stabilizing these structures to prevent alveolar collapse [312]; in this manner, surfactant reduces the work associated with breathing [1, 3, 7]. This surface material also serves as a barrier to pathogens [7], improves mucociliary transport [8], helps limit evolution of high-surface-tension pulmonary edema [8], and inhibits leakage of serum components into the airway [3]. The biological role of surfactant, however, as an integral component of the host defense system that exerts immunomodulatory activity has now emerged as an intriguing focus of several investigations using animal models of pulmonary infection and consideration in surfactant replacement therapies [6, 1315]. Taken together, the demonstration of key physiological and biological activities of this material has kept investigations of surfactant as a major focus in both basic as well as translational studies.

1.2. Surfactant composition, synthesis, and secretion

Pulmonary surfactant is a complex mixture of lipids and proteins that forms a monomolecular film that lines the alveolar air-surface interface [46]. Surfactant is comprised of roughly 90% lipids; 80–85% of which are phospholipids, 5–10% are neutral lipids [1620], and 10% are proteins (Figure 1) [4, 7, 8]. Phosphatidylcholine (PC) is the most predominant phospholipid in surfactant, accounting for ~75–80% of total phospholipid weight; this fraction of lipid is highly conserved across mammalian species [8, 11, 16, 18]. The major surface-active species of PC, termed dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC), is a saturated phospholipid comprising ~ 50% of PC that largely provides for the surface-tension lowering ability of this material. Phosphatidylglycerol (PG) and phosphatidylinositol (PI) account for 8–15% of the phospholipid portion [8, 11, 18]. Other minor phospholipids and neutral lipids are also detectable [8, 19, 21]. Although proteins make up a small fraction of surfactant, the four surfactant-associated proteins, surfactant protein (SP)-A, SP-B, SP-C, and SP-D [2, 6], all perform important roles in regulating surfactant function.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Breakdown of Surfactant Composition. Surfactant is composed of about 90% lipids and 10% proteins. The largest portion of this are the phospholipids, composed of phosphatidylcholine (half of which is dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine), phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylinositol, and others. Neutral lipids in surfactant are predominantly cholesterol, but also include free fatty acids, monoglycerides, diglycerides, and triglycerides. Proteins represent the remaining portion of surfactant of which surfactant-associated proteins are key components.

Surfactant is synthesized within the alveolar type II epithelial cells [69, 22]. After its biosynthesis, the surfactant components are packaged within lamellar bodies prior to secretion into the alveolar surface via calcium-dependent exocytosis (Figure 2) [2123]. β-adrenergic agents, and changes in ventilatory pattern are physiological triggers for surfactant secretion from alveolar epithelia, in addition to several biochemical mediators [24]. Once secreted, the components of lamellar bodies transform into tubular myelin [21], a lattice-like structure that is believed to be the precursor to the surfactant monolayer that forms and spreads over the air-liquid interface [4, 6, 22]. The surfactant film is formed by the rapid adsorption of the tubular myelin on the alveolar surface [4, 11, 21]. The film compresses, thus facilitating reduction in surface tension and is also purified during the breathing cycle as certain protein components are squeezed out of the film [21]. As surfactant is actively being secreted, materials are constantly being exchanged from the film and are recycled into the type II epithelial cells to maintain constant surfactant pool size [4, 11, 21]. Thus, many recycled alveolar surfactant components traffic back into newly formed lamellar bodies (Figure 2)[21].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Surfactant synthesis, secretion, and recycling. (1)Surfactant component are synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) of the alveolar type II cells and are then transported to the Golgi (2) where they are modified. (3) The phospholipid and protein components of surfactant are then stored in the lamellar bodies until they are secreted (4) via exocytosis into the hypophase. The surfactant constituents then form (5) tubular myelin which can either be transported to the surfactant reservoir (6) for later use or directly to the air-liquid interface (7) to form the surfactant film that protects the alveoli. The phospholipids are recycled (8) back to the type II cells to be stored in lamellar bodies until reuse.

1.3. Lipids in Surfactant Behavior

The lipid portion of surfactant is primarily responsible for the surface activity of the film [4, 7, 19], though it is not the sole component contributing to this function. The film is enriched in DPPC [11], the main component conferring reduced surface activity although other saturated molecular species of PC also may exert similar properties [25]; DPPC becomes a highly packed monomolecular film with a squeeze out of other unsaturated lipids during compression phases of the respiratory cycle to achieve the low surface tensions needed to protect alveoli from atelectasis during end-expiration [7, 19]. Other phospholipids including the anionic phospholipids, PG and PI, are believed to enhance adsorption into the film [11]. These phospholipids may also interact with the hydrophobic surfactant proteins, SP-B and SP-C, to stabilize the film [6, 8]. Optimal surface tension-reducing capabilities are observed when these components in surfactant act together, specifically the phospholipids, neutral lipids, SP-B, and SP-C [1]. Cholesterol is the predominant surfactant neutral lipid and addition of cholesterol and the other neutral lipids into DPPC or DPPC-PG films increases adsorption rates [8, 11, 17]. This process could result in increased fluidity of the film and regulate its re-distribution [7, 11, 17, 18]. Improper amounts of surfactant cholesterol may also disrupt surface tension lowering ability [8, 17, 18].

1.4. Surfactant Proteins

Surfactant contains four associated proteins, SP-A, SP-B, SP-C, and SP-D, all of which have been well studied and contribute importantly to surfactant behavior. SP-A and SP-D are larger, hydrophilic glycoproteins [4, 8, 16, 23] that play a significant role in the host defense system [1, 2, 6, 22]. SP-B and SP-C on the other hand are much smaller polypeptides, highly hydrophobic, and often co-isolate with lipids [4, 8, 16, 18]. These hydrophobic proteins play key roles in alveolar stability to assist in reducing surface tension thereby preventing alveolar collapse [1, 26], aiding in phospholipid adsorption and redistribution in surfactant films [2, 4, 7, 8, 20], and regulating surfactant production [1]. PLUNC (Palate, Lung, Nasal Epithelial Clone) appears to be a relatively new surfactant-like protein found in the upper airways [27]. PLUNC behaves similarly to SP-B and SP-C through its surface tension reducing properties but also resembles SP-A ad SP-D via its role in immunity [27]. PLUNC impairs Pseudomonas aeruginosa ability to form biofilms. In addition, related family members of PLUNC, specifically bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein (BPI) and lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP), react to gram negative bacteria to perhaps exert antimicrobial activity [27].

1.5. Hydrophobic surfactant proteins

Mutations in the gene encoding SP-B within chromosome 2 or reduced amounts of SP-B protein cause severe or even fatal respiratory failure in newborns [7, 8]. SP-B is synthesized as a dimeric structure, stored, and secreted from the lamellar bodies along with the surfactant phospholipids [7, 20]. This dimer is integral in fostering stability of compressed films and enhancing surface tension-reducing properties [7, 20]. Some studies suggest that SP-B may be involved in host defense by helping to initiate the clustering and eventual killing of bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus [8]. Hence, SP-B is crucial for survival [18].

SP-C has many similar functions to SP-B. SP-C is a very small protein (~4.2 kDa) whose gene is localized to chromosome 8 [1, 4]. Like SP-B, it is stored and secreted from the lamellar bodies in conjunction with the phospholipids [7]. SP-C is a membrane protein harboring a transmembrane fragment that is capable of operating as a signal peptide [7, 8]. This transmembrane portion assists SP-C to link the surfactant monolayer at the interface with the lipid bilayer [2, 7]. SP-C promotes adsorption and recycling of phospholipids and the spreading of lipids at the interface to optimize surfactant activity [2, 7, 8, 21]. Along with its roles in regulating surface activity, SP-C may be involved in host defense as it interacts with both lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and the pattern recognition molecule CD-14 found on phagocytes to reduce LPS-elicited responses [1, 8, 28]. Studies have demonstrated that SP-C binding to LPS may depend on the structure of LPS as well as its glycolipid components [1]. The ability of SP-C to associate with CD-14 suggests a role for this protein to contribute to the removal of pathogens although this requires further study [1]. Interestingly, targeted disruption of SP-C in mice is not lethal, but the absence of SP-C or the presence of misfolded SP-C proteins may be associated with interstitial lung disease [29, 30]. These results demonstrate that even though SP-C may not be as critical for some activities ascribed to surfactant, its deficiency may be linked to a broad range of regulatory events as an integral component of surfactant.

1.6. Hydrophilic surfactant proteins

SP-A and SP-D are the large, hydrophilic proteins found in surfactant. Both proteins are members of the collectin family of proteins, which are calcium-dependent carbohydrate binding lectins [2, 8, 21]. Encoded in rodents from genes located at the same locus on chromosome 10 [4, 13], SP-A and SP-D monomers entail four core domains: the NH2-terminal domain, a collagen domain, the neck region, and the C-terminal domain known as the carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) (Figure 3) [2, 14, 16, 31]. These monomers come together as a trimer [16], at which point SP-A forms an octadecamer or bouquet-like structure [2, 4, 13, 15] and SP-D forms a dodecamer, or crucible-like structure (Figure 3)[2, 15]. SP-A has been shown to facilitate the formation of tubular myelin from lamellar bodies, specifically when SP-B, SP-C and calcium are also present [2, 4, 22, 32]. Mice devoid of SP-A lack tubular myelin [2]. Additionally, similar experiments have demonstrated that lack of SP-D causes disruptions in surfactant homeostasis [2]. In addition to the important roles played by SP-A and SP-D in surfactant structure and metabolism, these collectins are critical components within the host defense system.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Structure of surfactant proteins A and D. Both SP-A and SP-D are composed of a NH2-terminal domain, a collagen domain, a neck region, and a carbohydrate recognition domain. These four domains come together to form a trimer. In SP-A, these trimers form an octadecamer while in SP-D they form a dodecamer.

2. Role of collectins in infection

There is mounting data indicating that the hydrophilic proteins SP-A and SP-D may have an indispensible role as elements involved in the innate defense system. These functions include the ability to aggregate and control the clearance of pathogens as well as the ability to modify macrophage function [33]. Both proteins are capable of binding to a multitude of different pathogens including fungi and yeast, Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, mycobacteria, mycoplasma, and viruses [14, 16]. In most cases, binding is contingent upon the CRD region of the proteins [13, 3134]. The variable patterns of spacing of the CRDs between SP-A and SP-D, along with the multimeric structure of the proteins, enable them to differentially bind and recognize a broad range of microbial agents [2, 35]. This ability to respond to such a wide array of pathogens might explain, in part, why healthy individuals so rarely develop severe respiratory tract infections [14]. The response of these collectins adjusts according to the type of pathogen and the needs of the host, which makes it a very efficient system.

2.1. Responding to pathogens

Bacteria

SP-A and SP-D are able to bind and neutralize both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria by acting as opsonins. Often these proteins induce bacterial aggregation that serves as an appropriate physical context for phagocytosis [2, 32]. These surfactant proteins interact with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli (specifically the rough strains), Salmonella minnesota, Streptococcus pneumoniae, group B streptococci, Haemophilus influenza, and Staphylococcus aureus [13, 32, 33, 35]. Both SP-A and SP-D bind to LPS, but they interact with LPS via different components: SP-D binds to LPS through the core oligosaccharides [32, 33], whereas SP-A binds to the lipid A domain [13, 33, 34]. SP-D binds Gram-positive bacteria though peptidoglycan and lipoteichoic acid [14, 16]. SP-A is unable to interact with these components but instead utilizes the extracellular adhesin protein, Eap, on Gram-positive S. aureus for opsonization [36]. After binding to bacteria, SP-A and SP-D facilitate their clearance through numerous mechanisms. SP-A and SP-D may also act as opsonins to enhance bacterial phagocytic removal [13, 15, 16]. Additionally, these collectins appear to exhibit antimicrobial effects on bacteria by potentially increasing the permeability of their membranes [35, 37]. SP-D is not capable of effectively aggregating P. aeruginosa [13, 33] and SP-A appears not to interact directly with this pathogen [13]. These collectins promote phagocytosis indirectly, by stimulating the activity of alveolar macrophages [13, 16]. The interaction of SP-A with S. aureus is more specialized compared to interaction with other microbes. SP-A mediates opsonization by binding to Eap expressing S. aureus [36]. S. aureus is opsonized by SP-A and then interacts with the putative SP-A receptor 210 (SP-R210) on alveolar macrophages for phagocytosis [36]. SP-R210 is also utilized to kill Mycobacterium bovis (bacillus Calmette-Guerin) that has been opsonized by SP-A [36].

Mycoplasma, fungi, and yeasts

SP-A and SP-D are both able to bind to Mycoplasma pneumonia [32][31], and SP-A in particular is highly effective in its clearance [38]. SP-A is also effective in limiting pro-inflammatory biological signals triggered by Mycoplasma pneumoniae [15]. Pulmonary infection with Mycoplasma is limited by SP-A which serves as a growth inhibitory signal for the microbe [35]. SP-A and SP-D also facilitate removal of fungi and yeasts from the pulmonary system. SP-D utilizes its CRD domain to bind to fungi and yeast, such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida albicans, via its surface glycoproteins [35]. Both collectins can bind fungi or yeast to aid in their aggregation [16, 35]. This interaction acts at times to inhibit growth, specifically for C. albicans, as phagocytosis may be inhibited due to the size of the resulting aggregates [16]. Aspergillus fumigatus [35], on the other hand, is phagocytized by macrophages following binding by SP-A or SP-D [32].

Viruses

Viruses differ in infectivity from many other pathogens due to the fact that they require entry into cells for subsequent replication [16]. Viral infections can have devastating effects on respiration if they are not efficiently removed from the system, an effect observed by the morbidity of past influenza pandemics [39]. SP-A and SP-D are both able to bind, agglutinate and enhance phagocytosis of numerous viruses, including influenza A virus, adenovirus, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and herpes simplex virus type 1 [13, 32, 35]. The collectins bind to these viruses via their CRD domains to glycoproteins on the surface of the viruses [32, 33]. SP-A and SP-D bind to different glycoproteins on RSV, yet both diminish infectivity [16, 32, 35]. SP-A and SP-D can promote phagocytosis of virions through both opsonic and non-opsonic mechanisms [15, 16, 35]. Collectin binding to influenza A virus occurs by recognition of hemagglutinin and neuraminidase glycans on the surface of the virus thereby hindering the ability of the virus for cell entry [35, 39]. This mechanism leads to aggregation and inactivation of the virion [35, 39]. It is possible that hemagglutinins found on influenza A viruses involved in past influenza outbreaks exhibited antigenic variations that resulted in reduced collectin binding, leading to greater virulence and subsequent high mortality and morbidity in patients [39].

Much of what is known about the roles collectins play in innate immunity has been achieved by experiments involving mice that are deficient in either of these proteins. Loss of SP-A results in delayed clearance of many pathogens due to deficient recognition and subsequent removal by macrophages [6, 13, 14]. Even more detrimental effects could be seen from the increase in release of inflammatory agents [14, 35]. SP-D knockout mice also display a robust pulmonary inflammatory response with decreased clearance of a variety of pathogens [6, 13, 14, 35]. These consequences can lead to an increase in growth, proliferation, and infectivity of invading microbes [35]. Thus, mice that lack SP-A and SP-D are clearly susceptible to infection and inflammation [2, 8, 13, 15, 37]. Of note, in humans there exist two genes, SP-A1 and SP-A2 that encode for SP-A1 and SP-A2 proteins [40]. The possibility that there may be subpopulations with differential vulnerabilities to microbial infection based on these species of SP-A is intriguing; however the detailed functionality of these isoforms requires further investigation. Overall, the existing data clearly demonstrate that SP-A and SP-D are potentially indispensible in the innate immune response.

2.2. Regulating inflammatory responses

The collectin proteins can also modulate the host inflammatory response independent of activities against microbial agents. For example, SP-A and SP-D play a major role in regulating inflammation by hastening the clearance of apoptotic cells and impeding the release of cytokines and other pro-inflammatory products [2, 6]. Multiple mechanisms exist by which cells remove dying cells. Apoptotic neutrophils are cleared via the interaction of SP-A and SP-D with myeloperoxidase, which is present on the surface of these cells [41]. SP-D has also been found to interact with immunoglobulin M to enhance phagocytic removal of late apoptotic cells [42]. When not interacting with pathogens, SP-A and SP-D bind to the signal inhibitory peptide (SIRP-alpha) on macrophages to attenuate release of pro- inflammatory products, specifically cytokines [2]. In some experiments using SP-A or SP-D knockout mice, the presence of pro-inflammatory cytokines is increased and inflammatory response resulting from infection is accentuated [13]. Further, these collectins are prone to nitrosylation, a modification that perturbs their tertiary structure. For example, S-nitrosylation of SP-D is chemoattractive for macrophages and induces pro-inflammatory signaling [43].

SP-A regulates signaling pathways in macrophages in response to microbial recognition that controls inflammation. In type II pneumocytes, SP-A can bind to various receptors, including P63 [44] and SPAR [45], to activate the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI-3K) pathway triggering phosphorylation of the downsteam kinase, Akt. Activation of the PI-3K-Akt pathway is pro-survival as Akt normally inactivates downstream pro-apoptotic signals such as glycogen synthase kinase -3β and forkhead transcription factor FKHR [45]. Akt activation leads to phosphorylation of IκBα leading to nuclear translocation of the transcription factor, NFκB, that induces expression of pro-inflammatory genes. However, in macrophages, SP-A increases the expression of Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2, and yet impairs its activity resulting in decreased Akt activation and nuclear NFκB [46]. Thus, SP-A differentially regulates critical signaling events within pulmonary cells that in turn controls inflammatory gene expression [46].

3. Role of lipids in infection

Recent studies have illuminated a potentially important role for surfactant phospholipids in altering the immune response. Phospholipids, specifically anionic lipids appear to act as immunosuppressive mediators by inhibiting responses such as release of reactive oxygen species and pro-inflammatory cytokines [8, 47, 48]. This may represent a self-preservation or feedback control mechanism to limit prolonged inflammation for these regulatory lipids.

3.1. Immunosuppression by phospholipids

Recently, anionic phospholipids, such as palmitoyl-oleoyl-phosphatidylglycerol (POPG) and phosphatidylinositol (PI), relatively minor components of pulmonary surfactant, appear to exhibit immunomodulatory activity. POPG and PI were observed to inhibit LPS-induced nitric oxide and tumor necrosis factor-alpha responses in lung macrophages by interfering with Toll-like receptor interactions with adaptor molecules, CD-14 and MD-2, involved in NF-κb induced cytokine signaling [49]. The same group demonstrated that anionic phospholipids impair pro-inflammatory signaling induced by M. pneumoniae and RSV [50]. Another anionic phospholipid and very minor component of surfactant, cardiolipin, was also found to be immunosuppressive after release from injured host cells in pneumonia [51]. Cardiolipin in this study was observed to potently inhibit surfactant activity.

3.2. Lipid inhibition of viral infectivity

Viruses are common pathogens that interact with surfactant phospholipids. To date, dipalmitoylphosphatidylglycerol (DPPG) has been the only phospholipid member of surfactant to inhibit viral infection, though others may also play a role [52]. Specifically, DPPG interacts with Vaccinia virus, an orthopoxvirus. Small vesicles containing DPPG inhibit viral infection by blocking attachment of the virions to host cells [52]. DPPG likely impairs interaction with cell membranes by obstructing viral ligand binding with cell surface receptors [52]. Future studies will need to determine if other phospholipids have similar effects on viral infectivity.

3.3. Facilitating viral host cell entry by lipids

A significant body of data also suggests that surfactant phospholipids facilitate the entry of viruses into host cells [5356]. DPPC, the predominant surface-active lipid, binds and enhances adenoviral entry into alveolar epithelium [52, 53]. As surfactant DPPC is reutilized after alveolar secretion by reincorporation into alveolar cells during recycling, it would appear that adenovirus exploits this pathway for cell entry. These effects on adenoviral trafficking with lipids appear to be specific to saturated lipids (e.g. DPPC), as monounsaturated forms of PC bind the virus but impede particle entry [53].

Phosphatidylserine (PS) also enhances viral infection by increasing fusion of the virus to cell membranes [54] by masquerading as an apoptotic signal [55, 56]. In cells undergoing apoptosis, PS transmigrates from the inner to outer membrane of dying host cells as a signal for efferocytosis, a form of phagocytosis [56]. In viruses, PS is associated mainly with enveloped forms [54]. Vaccinia virus, particularly the mature viral form, by either expressing PS on its envelope or interacting with surfactant PS, is recognized by many cell types as an efferocytotic signal for internalization [55]. By exploiting this mechanism for host cell entry, which inhibits the initiation of the inflammatory response, the virus may go undetected by the immune system enabling it to spread to surrounding cells [55]. However, this ability of PS to facilitate some viruses to enter cells can also be utilized as a translational tool by using enveloped viral vectors for therapeutic gene transfer [54].

4. Role of infection on surfactant composition

Several studies demonstrate that surfactant composition is altered in human subjects with respiratory infection [79, 12, 13]. These observations have led to studies using animal models of pneumonia or cellular systems to better understand microbial virulence factors that might alter surfactant metabolism. Lower respiratory tract pathogens modify surfactant balance by several mechanisms that directly reduce intra-alveolar availability of both apoprotein and lipid components, decrease surfactant biosynthesis, or impair its secretion [33, 37, 5761]. For example, virulence factors released from P. aeruginosa have been linked to degradation of collectins [16, 33, 37, 5759], and bacterial exotoxins displaying lipase activity are implicated in surfactant phospholipid hydrolysis [6264]. P. aeruginosa secretes elastases [33, 57] and protease IV [58] that mediate degradation of SP-A and SP-D by targeting the CRD domain [16, 33, 37, 57, 58]. Protease IV also exhibits activity against SP-B, resulting in impaired surfactant function [58]. Degradation of collectins by these proteases can potentially leave the host vulnerable to developing severe infection [57]. A mucoid strain of P. aeruginosa also reduces levels of surfactant phospholipids by inhibiting gene transcription of the rate-limiting enzyme, cytidylyltransferase, required for PC synthesis [59]. Mucoid strains also inhibit gene transcription of SP-B and SP-C, compounding surfactant deficiency that impairs stability of surfactant films [59]. In addition, other components of gram-negative bacteria, such as LPS inhibit phospholipid synthesis and secretion [59, 60]. Bacterial suppression of surfactant production may also be indirect via release of host cell cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor -α, which targets surfactant biosynthetic enzymes for degradation[5760]. Human adenovirus can also alter surfactant phospholipid composition [61], whereas Aspergillus fumigatus and Pneumocystis carinii can downregulate SP-B and SP-C protein and mRNA expression [1]. In some studies, pathogens induce expression of collectins [6567].

5. Concluding Remarks

Even though a great deal is known about the composition of surfactant and the roles these components play in lung balance, there is still much to learn. Surfactant phospholipids, along with SP-B and SP-C, are crucial to maintain surface activity. Deficiencies or alterations to these components can have devastating effects on pulmonary function resulting in lung injury. SP-A and SP-D play an integral role in regulating innate host defense. Additional research is needed to fully understand the biological and clinical relevance of these surfactant components to human disease. It is anticipated that the next phase of investigation will capture newer tools of genomics, proteonomics, and lipidomics to link this work with personalized medicine to enhance our understanding of the fundamental roles of surfactant. These approaches can be used in the future to identify high-risk populations for lower tract infection or to devise novel strategies to optimize lung function in the setting of pulmonary infection and inflammation. More work is needed to examine how newer, emerging virulent pathogens evade the protective responses of the surfactant system to initiate and sustain infection. Enhancing this knowledge will potentially help improve the outcome of patients with severe respiratory illness.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Ms. Tiffany Coon for critical review of the manuscript and helpful suggestions. This material is based upon work supported, in part, by the US Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Research and Development, Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development. This work was supported by a Merit Review Award from the US Department of Veterans Affairs and National Institutes of Health R01 grants HL096376, HL097376 and HL098174 (to R.K.M.). The contents presented do not represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Mulugeta S, Beers MF. Surfactant protein C: its unique properties and emerging immunomodulatory role in the lung. Microbes Infect. 2006;8:2317–2323. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2006.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Orgeig S, Hiemstra PS, Veldhuizen EJ, Casals C, Clark HW, Haczku A, Knudsen L, Possmayer F. Recent advances in alveolar biology: evolution and function of alveolar proteins. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2010;173 Suppl:S43–S54. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2010.04.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Maina JN, West JB, Orgeig S, Foot NJ, Daniels CB, Kiama SG, Gehr P, Muhlfeld C, Blank F, Muller L, Lehmann A, Brandenberger C, Rothen-Rutishauser B. Recent advances into understanding some aspects of the structure and function of mammalian and avian lungs. Physiol Biochem Zool. 2010;83:792–807. doi: 10.1086/652244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rooney SA, Young SL, Mendelson CR. Molecular and cellular processing of lung surfactant. FASEB J. 1994;8:957–967. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.8.12.8088461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schmidt R, Markart P, Ruppert C, Wygrecka M, Kuchenbuch T, Walmrath D, Seeger W, Guenther A. Time-dependent changes in pulmonary surfactant function and composition in acute respiratory distress syndrome due to pneumonia or aspiration. Respir Res. 2007;8:55. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-8-55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Barreira ER, Precioso AR, Bousso A. Pulmonary surfactant in respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis: The role in pathogenesis and clinical implications. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2010 doi: 10.1002/ppul.21395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mingarro I, Lukovic D, Vilar M, Perez-Gil J. Synthetic pulmonary surfactant preparations: new developments and future trends. Curr Med Chem. 2008;15:393–403. doi: 10.2174/092986708783497364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Blanco O, Perez-Gil J. Biochemical and pharmacological differences between preparations of exogenous natural surfactant used to treat Respiratory Distress Syndrome: role of the different components in an efficient pulmonary surfactant. Eur J Pharmacol. 2007;568:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.04.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pace PW, Yao LJ, Wilson JX, Possmayer F, Veldhuizen RA, Lewis JF. The effects of hyperoxia exposure on lung function and pulmonary surfactant in a rat model of acute lung injury. Exp Lung Res. 2009;35:380–398. doi: 10.1080/01902140902745166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Maruscak AA, Vockeroth DW, Girardi B, Sheikh T, Possmayer F, Lewis JF, Veldhuizen RA. Alterations to surfactant precede physiological deterioration during high tidal volume ventilation. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2008;294:L974–L983. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00528.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Veldhuizen R, Nag K, Orgeig S, Possmayer F. The role of lipids in pulmonary surfactant. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1408:90–108. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4439(98)00061-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hohlfeld J, Fabel H, Hamm H. The role of pulmonary surfactant in obstructive airways disease. Eur Respir J. 1997;10:482–491. doi: 10.1183/09031936.97.10020482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.LeVine AM, Whitsett JA. Pulmonary collectins and innate host defense of the lung. Microbes Infect. 2001;3:161–166. doi: 10.1016/s1286-4579(00)01363-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kingma PS, Whitsett JA. In defense of the lung: surfactant protein A and surfactant protein D. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2006;6:277–283. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2006.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ledford JG, Pastva AM, Wright JR. Review: Collectins link innate and adaptive immunity in allergic airway disease. Innate Immun. 2010;16:183–190. doi: 10.1177/1753425910368446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Haagsman HP, Hogenkamp A, van Eijk M, Veldhuizen EJ. Surfactant collectins and innate immunity. Neonatology. 2008;93:288–294. doi: 10.1159/000121454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Markart P, Ruppert C, Wygrecka M, Colaris T, Dahal B, Walmrath D, Harbach H, Wilhelm J, Seeger W, Schmidt R, Guenther A. Patients with ARDS show improvement but not normalisation of alveolar surface activity with surfactant treatment: putative role of neutral lipids. Thorax. 2007;62:588–594. doi: 10.1136/thx.2006.062398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gomez-Gil L, Schurch D, Goormaghtigh E, Perez-Gil J. Pulmonary surfactant protein SP-C counteracts the deleterious effects of cholesterol on the activity of surfactant films under physiologically relevant compression-expansion dynamics. Biophys J. 2009;97:2736–2745. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.08.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Picardi MV, Cruz A, Orellana G, Perez-Gil J. Phospholipid packing and hydration in pulmonary surfactant membranes and films as sensed by LAURDAN. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1808:696–705. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2010.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Schurch D, Ospina OL, Cruz A, Perez-Gil J. Combined and independent action of proteins SP-B and SP-C in the surface behavior and mechanical stability of pulmonary surfactant films. Biophys J. 2010;99:3290–3299. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.09.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Goerke J. Pulmonary surfactant: functions and molecular composition. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1408:79–89. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4439(98)00060-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Muhlfeld C, Becker L, Bussinger C, Vollroth M, Nagib R, Schaefer IM, Knudsen L, Richter J, Madershahian N, Wahlers T, Wittwer T, Ochs M. Exogenous surfactant in ischemia/reperfusion: effects on endogenous surfactant pools. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010;29:327–334. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.O'Reilly MA, Nogee L, Whitsett JA. Requirement of the collagenous domain for carbohydrate processing and secretion of a surfactant protein, SP-A. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1988;969:176–184. doi: 10.1016/0167-4889(88)90073-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ballard PL. Hormones and lung maturation. Monogr Endocrinol. 1986;28:1–354. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Postle AD, Gonzales LW, Bernhard W, Clark GT, Godinez MH, Godinez RI, Ballard PL. Lipidomics of cellular and secreted phospholipids from differentiated human fetal type II alveolar epithelial cells. J Lipid Res. 2006;47:1322–1331. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M600054-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Curstedt T, Johansson J. Different effects of surfactant proteins B and C - implications for development of synthetic surfactants. Neonatology. 2010;97:367–372. doi: 10.1159/000297767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gakhar L, Bartlett JA, Penterman J, Mizrachi D, Singh PK, Mallampalli RK, Ramaswamy S, McCray PB., Jr PLUNC is a novel airway surfactant protein with anti-biofilm activity. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Garcia-Verdugo I, Garcia de Paco E, Espinassous Q, Gonzalez-Horta A, Synguelakis M, Kanellopoulos J, Rivas L, Chaby R, Perez-Gil J. Synthetic peptides representing the N-terminal segment of surfactant protein C modulate LPS-stimulated TNF-alpha production by macrophages. Innate Immun. 2009;15:53–62. doi: 10.1177/1753425908100500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cameron HS, Somaschini M, Carrera P, Hamvas A, Whitsett JA, Wert SE, Deutsch G, Nogee LM. A common mutation in the surfactant protein C gene associated with lung disease. J Pediatr. 2005;146:370–375. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.10.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lawson WE, Polosukhin VV, Stathopoulos GT, Zoia O, Han W, Lane KB, Li B, Donnelly EF, Holburn GE, Lewis KG, Collins RD, Hull WM, Glasser SW, Whitsett JA, Blackwell TS. Increased and prolonged pulmonary fibrosis in surfactant protein C-deficient mice following intratracheal bleomycin. Am J Pathol. 2005;167:1267–1277. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)61214-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hickman-Davis JM, Fang FC, Nathan C, Shepherd VL, Voelker DR, Wright JR. Lung surfactant and reactive oxygen-nitrogen species: antimicrobial activity and host-pathogen interactions. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2001;281:L517–L523. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.2001.281.3.L517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mason RJ, Greene K, Voelker DR. Surfactant protein A and surfactant protein D in health and disease. Am J Physiol. 1998;275:L1–L13. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.1998.275.1.L1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Alcorn JF, Wright JR. Degradation of pulmonary surfactant protein D by Pseudomonas aeruginosa elastase abrogates innate immune function. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:30871–30879. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M400796200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Shang F, Rynkiewicz MJ, McCormack FX, Wu H, Cafarella TM, Head JF, Seaton BA. Crystallographic complexes of surfactant protein A and carbohydrates reveal ligand-induced conformational change. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:757–765. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.175265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kishore U, Greenhough TJ, Waters P, Shrive AK, Ghai R, Kamran MF, Bernal AL, Reid KB, Madan T, Chakraborty T. Surfactant proteins SP-A and SP-D: structure, function and receptors. Mol Immunol. 2006;43:1293–1315. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2005.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sever-Chroneos Z, Krupa A, Davis J, Hasan M, Yang CH, Szeliga J, Herrmann M, Hussain M, Geisbrecht BV, Kobzik L, Chroneos ZC. Surfactant protein A (SP-A)-mediated clearance of Staphylococcus aureus involves binding of SP-A to the staphylococcal adhesin eap and the macrophage receptors SP-A receptor 210 and scavenger receptor class A. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:4854–4870. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.125567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kuang Z, Hao Y, Hwang S, Zhang S, Kim E, Akinbi HT, Schurr MJ, Irvin RT, Hassett DJ, Lau GW. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa flagellum confers resistance to pulmonary surfactant protein-A by impacting the production of exoproteases through quorum-sensing. Mol Microbiol. 2011;79:1220–1235. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07516.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chiba H, Pattanajitvilai S, Mitsuzawa H, Kuroki Y, Evans A, Voelker DR. Pulmonary surfactant proteins A and D recognize lipid ligands on Mycoplasma pneumoniae and markedly augment the innate immune response to the organism. Chest. 2003;123:426S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Qi L, Kash JC, Dugan VG, Jagger BW, Lau YF, Sheng ZM, Crouch EC, Hartshorn KL, Taubenberger JK. The ability of pandemic influenza virus hemagglutinins to induce lower respiratory pathology is associated with decreased surfactant protein D binding. Virology. 2011;412:426–434. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2011.01.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Floros J, Wang, Guirong, Mikerov, Anatoly N. Genetic Complexity of the Human Innate Host Defense Molecules, Surfactant Protein A1 (SP-A1) and SP-A2- Impact on Function. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2009;19:125–137. doi: 10.1615/critreveukargeneexpr.v19.i2.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Jakel A, Clark H, Reid KB, Sim RB. Surface-bound myeloperoxidase is a ligand for recognition of late apoptotic neutrophils by human lung surfactant proteins A and D. Protein Cell. 2010;1:563–572. doi: 10.1007/s13238-010-0076-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Litvack ML, Djiadeu P, Renganathan SD, Sy S, Post M, Palaniyar N. Natural IgM and innate immune collectin SP-D bind to late apoptotic cells and enhance their clearance by alveolar macrophages in vivo. Mol Immunol. 2010;48:37–47. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2010.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Guo CJ, Atochina-Vasserman EN, Abramova E, Foley JP, Zaman A, Crouch E, Beers MF, Savani RC, Gow AJ. S-nitrosylation of surfactant protein-D controls inflammatory function. PLoS Biol. 2008;6:e266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kazi AS, Tao JQ, Feinstein SI, Zhang L, Fisher AB, Bates SR. Role of the PI3-kinase signaling pathway in trafficking of the surfactant protein A receptor P63 (CKAP4) on type II pneumocytes. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2010;299:L794–L807. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00372.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.White MK, Strayer DS. Survival signaling in type II pneumocytes activated by surfactant protein-A. Exp Cell Res. 2002;280:270–279. doi: 10.1006/excr.2002.5646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Henning LN, Azad AK, Parsa KV, Crowther JE, Tridandapani S, Schlesinger LS. Pulmonary surfactant protein A regulates TLR expression and activity in human macrophages. J Immunol. 2008;180:7847–7858. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.12.7847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mander A, Langton-Hewer S, Bernhard W, Warner JO, Postle D. Altered phospholipid composition and aggregate structure of lung surfactant is associated with impaired lung function in young children with respiratory infections. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2002;27:714–721. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.4746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chao W, Spragg RG, Smith RM. Inhibitory effect of porcine surfactant on the respiratory burst oxidase in human neutrophils. Attenuation of p47phox and p67phox membrane translocation as the mechanism. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:2654–2660. doi: 10.1172/JCI118331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kuronuma K, Mitsuzawa H, Takeda K, Nishitani C, Chan ED, Kuroki Y, Nakamura M, Voelker DR. Anionic pulmonary surfactant phospholipids inhibit inflammatory responses from alveolar macrophages and U937 cells by binding the lipopolysaccharide-interacting proteins CD14 and MD-2. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:25488–25500. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.040832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Numata M, Chu HW, Dakhama A, Voelker DR. Pulmonary surfactant phosphatidylglycerol inhibits respiratory syncytial virus-induced inflammation and infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:320–325. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0909361107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ray NB, Durairaj L, Chen BB, McVerry BJ, Ryan AJ, Donahoe M, Waltenbaugh AK, O'Donnell CP, Henderson FC, Etscheidt CA, McCoy DM, Agassandian M, Hayes-Rowan EC, Coon TA, Butler PL, Gakhar L, Mathur SN, Sieren JC, Tyurina YY, Kagan VE, McLennan G, Mallampalli RK. Dynamic regulation of cardiolipin by the lipid pump Atp8b1 determines the severity of lung injury in experimental pneumonia. Nat Med. 2010;16:1120–1127. doi: 10.1038/nm.2213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Perino J, Crouzier D, Spehner D, Debouzy JC, Garin D, Crance JM, Favier AL. Lung surfactant DPPG phospholipid inhibits vaccinia virus infection. Antiviral Res. 2011;89:89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2010.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Balakireva L, Schoehn G, Thouvenin E, Chroboczek J. Binding of adenovirus capsid to dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine provides a novel pathway for virus entry. J Virol. 2003;77:4858–4866. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.8.4858-4866.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Coil DA, Miller AD. Enhancement of enveloped virus entry by phosphatidylserine. J Virol. 2005;79:11496–11500. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.17.11496-11500.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Mercer J, Helenius A. Vaccinia virus uses macropinocytosis and apoptotic mimicry to enter host cells. Science. 2008;320:531–535. doi: 10.1126/science.1155164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Laliberte JP, Moss B. Appraising the apoptotic mimicry model and the role of phospholipids for poxvirus entry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:17517–17521. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0909376106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mariencheck WI, Alcorn JF, Palmer SM, Wright JR. Pseudomonas aeruginosa elastase degrades surfactant proteins A and D. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2003;28:528–537. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2002-0141OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Malloy JL, Veldhuizen RA, Thibodeaux BA, O'Callaghan RJ, Wright JR. Pseudomonas aeruginosa protease IV degrades surfactant proteins and inhibits surfactant host defense and biophysical functions. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2005;288:L409–L418. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00322.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wu Y, Xu Z, Henderson FC, Ryan AJ, Yahr TL, Mallampalli RK. Chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection reduces surfactant levels by inhibiting its biosynthesis. Cell Microbiol. 2007;9:1062–1072. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00852.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Henderson FC, Miakotina OL, Mallampalli RK. Proapoptotic effects of P. aeruginosa involve inhibition of surfactant phosphatidylcholine synthesis. J Lipid Res. 2006;47:2314–2324. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M600284-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Miakotina OL, McCoy DM, Shi L, Look DC, Mallampalli RK. Human adenovirus modulates surfactant phospholipid trafficking. Traffic. 2007;8:1765–1777. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2007.00641.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zhou J, Wu Y, Henderson F, McCoy DM, Salome RG, McGowan SE, Mallampalli RK. Adenoviral gene transfer of a mutant surfactant enzyme ameliorates pseudomonas-induced lung injury. Gene Ther. 2006;13:974–985. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Pankhaniya RR, Tamura M, Allmond LR, Moriyama K, Ajayi T, Wiener-Kronish JP, Sawa T. Pseudomonas aeruginosa causes acute lung injury via the catalytic activity of the patatin-like phospholipase domain of ExoU. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:2293–2299. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000145588.79063.07. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Attalah HL, Wu Y, Alaoui-El-Azher M, Thouron F, Koumanov K, Wolf C, Brochard L, Harf A, Delclaux C, Touqui L. Induction of type-IIA secretory phospholipase A2 in animal models of acute lung injury. Eur Respir J. 2003;21:1040–1045. doi: 10.1183/09031936.03.00093002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kawasaki Y, Endo K, Suyama K, Sato M, Ito M, Hashimoto K, Hosoya M. Serum SP-D levels as a biomarker of lung injury in respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2011;46:18–22. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Haczku A. Protective role of the lung collectins surfactant protein A and surfactant protein D in airway inflammation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;122:861–879. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.10.014. quiz 880-861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Forbes LR, Haczku A. SP-D and regulation of the pulmonary innate immune system in allergic airway changes. Clin Exp Allergy. 2010;40:547–562. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2010.03483.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES