Discussion
Wed May 28
19:44
Alois P. Heinz: Ok, yes, they are back. Plus some new crossrefs. Thanks.
CROSSREFS
Cf. A000045, A000079, A000930, A003520, A005708, A005709, A005710, A005711, A017898, A048718, A072827, A072850-A072856, A079955-A080014.
See A017898 for an essentially identical sequence.
Discussion
Wed May 28
19:01
Vladimir Baltic: I tried to put more crossrefs, but I delete all of them...
I think I've corrected it.
Discussion
Wed May 28
14:41
Alois P. Heinz: You deleted all the crossrefs, perhaps not a good idea. But can you explain why?
Discussion
Wed May 28
14:24
Vladimir Baltic: I prefer
"Number of permutations satisfying -k<=p(i)-i<=r and p(i)-i not in I, i=1..n, with k=1, r=3, I={1,2}."
than
"Number of permutations satisfying -1<=p(i)-i<=3 and p(i)-i not in {1,2}."
or
"Number of permutations satisfying p(i)-i in {-1,0,3}."
as is the terminology used in my paper "On the number of certain types of strongly restricted permutations", Applicable Analysis and Discrete Mathematics Vol. 4, No 1 (2010), 119-135, as well as in seq.
A072827, A072850-A072856, A079955-A080014
Discussion
Wed May 28
12:16
Joerg Arndt: Better wording(?): "Number of permutations satisfying -1<=p(i)-i<=3 and p(i)-i not in {1,2}." Alternatively, giving set of all allowed values for p(i)-i.
COMMENTS
Number of permutations satisfying -k<=p(i)-i<=r and p(i)-i not in I, i=1..n, with k=1, r=3, I={1,2}. - Vladimir Baltic, Mar 07 2012
Discussion
Mon May 26
01:22
OEIS Server: This sequence has not been edited or commented on for a week
yet is not proposed for review. If it is ready for review, please
visit https://oeis.org/draft/A003269 and click the button that reads
"These changes are ready for review by an OEIS Editor."
Thanks.
- The OEIS Server
NAME
allocated for Vladimir Baltic
NAME
allocated for Vladimir Baltic
NAME
allocated for Vladimir Baltic