The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences (OEIS)

Revision History for A343735 (Bold, blue-underlined text is an addition; faded, red-underlined text is a ~~deletion~~.)
Showing entries 1-10 | older changes

A343735

Odd palindromes having more divisors than all smaller odd palindromes.
(history; published version)

#26 by N. J. A. Sloane at Thu Jul 15 03:06:37 EDT 2021

COMMENTS

There exist at least 1 m-digit term and at most 4 m-digit terms for every m in 1..21. - Bhupendra Kumar Singh, Jun 27 2021

STATUS

proposed

approved

#25 by Michel Marcus at Sun Jun 27 12:02:12 EDT 2021

STATUS

editing

proposed

Discussion

Sun Jun 27

20:35

Kevin Ryde: Umm, a statement about currently known data in a sequence is usually not very interesting, unless there's good reasons to suspect it true forever onwards too.  For instance is there at least one new record high in each digit length ?

Mon Jun 28

01:15

Jon E. Schoenfield: << For instance is there at least one new record high in each digit length ? >> There wasn't in A344422...

Sat Jul 03

15:16

Bhupendra Kumar Singh: @editors : please accept or reject accordingly.

#24 by Michel Marcus at Sun Jun 27 12:01:38 EDT 2021

COMMENTS

There exist at least one 1 m-digit term and at most four 4 m-digit terms for every m in 1..21. - Bhupendra Kumar Singh, Jun 27 2021

#23 by Michel Marcus at Sun Jun 27 12:00:37 EDT 2021

COMMENTS

From _There exist at least one m-digit term and at most four m-digit terms for every m in 1..21. - _Bhupendra Kumar Singh_, Jun 27 2021:

There exist at least one m-digit term and at most four m-digit terms for every m in 1..21.

STATUS

proposed

editing

#22 by Bhupendra Kumar Singh at Sun Jun 27 11:59:29 EDT 2021

STATUS

editing

proposed

#21 by Bhupendra Kumar Singh at Sun Jun 27 11:57:32 EDT 2021

COMMENTS

From Bhupendra Kumar Singh, Jun 27 2021: (Start)

Conjecture: all terms are odd. (End)

STATUS

proposed

editing

Discussion

Sun Jun 27

11:59

Bhupendra Kumar Singh: @Michel Marcus sir : sorry sir updated comment

#20 by Bhupendra Kumar Singh at Sun Jun 27 11:43:05 EDT 2021

STATUS

editing

proposed

Discussion

Sun Jun 27

11:49

Michel Marcus: Conjecture: all terms are odd  ?   name says ----Odd----- palindromes

#19 by Bhupendra Kumar Singh at Sun Jun 27 11:40:29 EDT 2021

COMMENTS

3 is the only prime There exist at least one m-digit term and at most four m-digit terms for every m in the sequence1..21.

All terms are divisible by 3 from a(2) to a(49). (End)

Conjecture: all terms are odd. (End)

STATUS

proposed

editing

Discussion

Sun Jun 27

11:43

Bhupendra Kumar Singh: @Jon sir and @editors : Sir I deleted my previous comment and added new comment relevant to this sequence.

#18 by Bhupendra Kumar Singh at Sun Jun 27 05:23:11 EDT 2021

STATUS

editing

proposed

Discussion

Sun Jun 27

06:06

Joerg Arndt: Suggest to reject this comment.

06:10

Kevin Ryde: The b-file data?  That's also by Jon :), so you can leave that out.  (A counter-example would have been a much different matter!)

10:14

Jon E. Schoenfield: It's okay with me if the comment is rejected.

#17 by Michel Marcus at Sun Jun 27 02:53:48 EDT 2021

COMMENTS

3 is the only prime palindrome or prime number in the sequence.

STATUS

proposed

editing

Discussion

Sun Jun 27

02:54

Michel Marcus: All terms are divisible by 3 from a(2) to a(49) : this is already said, see : All terms after a(1)=1 are multiples of 3.

05:23

Bhupendra Kumar Singh: @Michel Marcus sir ,statement said by Jon sir as conjecture but my statement said as fact according to available data .