[go: up one dir, main page]

login

Year-end appeal: Please make a donation to the OEIS Foundation to support ongoing development and maintenance of the OEIS. We are now in our 61st year, we have over 378,000 sequences, and we’ve reached 11,000 citations (which often say “discovered thanks to the OEIS”).

Revision History for A131657 (Bold, blue-underlined text is an addition; faded, red-underlined text is a deletion.)

Showing entries 1-10 | older changes
For n >= 1, put A_n(z) = Sum_{j>=0} (n*j)!/(j!^n) * z^j and B_n(z) = Sum_{j>=0} (n*j)!/(j!^n) * z^j * (Sum_{k=1..j*n} (1/k)), and let b(n) be the largest integer for which exp(B_n(z)/(b(n)*A_n(z))) has integral coefficients. The sequence is b(n).
(history; published version)
#37 by Peter Luschny at Sun Sep 22 07:25:01 EDT 2024
STATUS

reviewed

approved

#36 by Joerg Arndt at Sun Sep 22 03:20:48 EDT 2024
STATUS

proposed

reviewed

#35 by Jason Yuen at Sun Sep 22 03:17:56 EDT 2024
STATUS

editing

proposed

#34 by Jason Yuen at Sun Sep 22 03:17:45 EDT 2024
EXAMPLE

Thus, the conjectured value for a(24) is 24! * (2^{(0-4) * 3^(0-1) * 5^(1-0) * 7^(0-1) * 11^(0-1) * 13^(0-1) * 17^(0-1) * 19^(0-1) * 23^(0-1)) since no exponent of a prime is > 2. This product equals 8691005030400000 = a(24). (End)

STATUS

approved

editing

#33 by Joerg Arndt at Mon May 25 07:53:59 EDT 2020
STATUS

reviewed

approved

#32 by Peter Luschny at Mon May 25 04:11:45 EDT 2020
STATUS

proposed

reviewed

#31 by Peter Luschny at Mon May 25 03:54:38 EDT 2020
STATUS

editing

proposed

Discussion
Mon May 25
03:57
Michel Marcus: ok understood : you had to tweak the conjecture with Xi(7)=1/140 to make it work, is that it ?  (I did not look at the article)
03:57
Petros Hadjicostas: Thanks. And if anyone figures out their conjecture (in their paper) for A131658, please let me know. They refer to pp. 7-8, but I cannot find it.
04:00
Petros Hadjicostas: Yes, the case n = 7 is an aberration. They explicitly single it out. (The case n = 1 is not because an empty product equals 1.)
#30 by Peter Luschny at Mon May 25 03:54:13 EDT 2020
EXAMPLE

Let us To illustrate the Krattenhaler-Rivoal conjecture for consider the case n = 24. We have Then H_24 = Sum_{k=1..24} 1/k = 1347822955/356948592 and {p <= 24} = {2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23} with {v_p(numerator): p <= 24} = {0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0} and {v_p(denominator): p <= 24} = {4, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}.

Discussion
Mon May 25
03:54
Peter Luschny: Light edits. OK?
#29 by Peter Luschny at Mon May 25 03:53:10 EDT 2020
COMMENTS

According to Krattenhaler and Rivoal (2007-2009), their conjecture is that a(n) = n!*Xi(n), where Xi(1) = 1, Xi(7) = 1/140, and Xi(n) = Product_{p <= n} p^min(2, v_p(H_n)) for n <> 1, 7, where v_p(r) is the p-adic valuation of rational r. (Here p indicates a prime and H_n is the n-th harmonic number.) - Petros Hadjicostas, May 24 2020

STATUS

proposed

editing

#28 by Petros Hadjicostas at Mon May 25 03:47:30 EDT 2020
STATUS

editing

proposed

Discussion
Mon May 25
03:50
Petros Hadjicostas: Yes, this is what I mean: if you do not use the ad hoc value "1/140" and you use n! * Product_{p <= n} p^min(2, v_p(n)) for n=7, you get 108.
03:51
Petros Hadjicostas: 7!*(1/140) = 36