Sperotto, Fernanda Q. and Tartaruga, Iván G. P. (2021): The Green Side of Industry: The Drivers and the Impacts of ECO-Innovations in Brazil. Published in: Sustainability , Vol. 13, No. 14 (19 July 2021): p. 8065.
Preview |
PDF
sustainability-13-08065-v2.pdf Download (24MB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study aimed to provide an overview of eco-innovations in the Brazilian industry. To address this issue, we analyzed specific data of eco-innovative companies. In addition, we applied the cluster heatmap technique, which allowed us to analyze the different drivers and impacts of eco-innovations in different sectors. According to the results, companies that stated that innovation made it possible to reduce their environmental impact represent a third of all innovators. Moreover, they are companies that have shown greater effort to innovate and greater susceptibility to the benefits and obstacles of innovation. Furthermore, the eco-innovation strategy is mainly driven by market factors, such as reputation and codes of good practice. The impacts are mainly associated with the use of more widespread and less complex technologies, such as recycling. In addition to these results, the study considers some alternatives to guide the innovation policy, especially related to eco-innovations in semi-peripherical countries.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Green Side of Industry: The Drivers and the Impacts of ECO-Innovations in Brazil |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | sustainability; green technologies; environmental innovation; industry; Brazil |
Subjects: | L - Industrial Organization > L6 - Industry Studies: Manufacturing O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q55 - Technological Innovation Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth |
Item ID: | 109149 |
Depositing User: | Iván G. Peyré Tartaruga |
Date Deposited: | 20 Jul 2022 09:53 |
Last Modified: | 26 Jul 2022 11:07 |
References: | United Nations. The Sustainable Development Goals. 2018. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/goals (accessed on 17 December 2019). Kemp, R.; Pearson, P. Final Report MEI Project about Measuring ECO-Innovation; UM-Merit: Maastricht, The Netherlands, 2007; Available online: https://www.oecd.org/env/consumption-innovation/43960830.pdf (accessed on 9 October 2016). Arundel, A.; Kemp, R. Measuring ECO-Innovation. Working Paper Series; United Nations University, 2009. Available online: http://collections.unu.edu/eserv/unu:324/wp2009-017.pdf (accessed on 16 September 2016). Kemp, R. ECO-innovation: Definition, Measurement and Open Research Issues. Econ. Politica 2010, 27, 397–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Mazzucato, M.; Semieniuk, G.; Watson, J. What Will It Take to Get Us to a Green Revolution? Policy Paper 2015, U. Sussex. Available online: https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=what-will-it-take-to-get-us-a-green-revolution.pdf&site=264 (accessed on 16 January 2016). Perez, C.; Leach, T. A Smart Green ‘European Way of Life’: The Path for Growth, Jobs and Wellbeing. Beyond the Technological Revolution, Working Paper Series. 2018. Available online: http://beyondthetechrevolution.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/BTTR_WP_2018-1.pdf (accessed on 9 August 2018). Lema, R.; Fu, X.; Rabellotti, R. Green windows of opportunity: Latecomer development in the age of transformation toward sustainability. Ind. Corp. Chang. 2021, 29, 1193–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Horbach, J.; Rammer, C.; Rennings, K. Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact—The role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 78, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Freeman, C. The greening of technology and models of innovation. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1996, 53, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Mazzucato, M.; Semieniuk, G. Public financing of innovation: New questions. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 2017, 33, 24–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Perez, C. Unleashing a golden age after the financial collapse: Drawing lessons from history. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2013, 6, 9–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Perez, C. Cambio tecnológico y oportunidades de desarrollo como blanco móvil. Rev. CEPAL 2001, 75, 115–136. Available online: http://www.eclac.org/publicaciones/xml/3/19323/perez.pdf (accessed on 7 April 2013). [CrossRef] Perez, C. Innovation Systems and Policy: Not only for the Rich? Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 2012, n. 42. pp. 1–23. Available online: http://technologygovernance.eu/files/main/2012071005451212.pdf (accessed on 13 April 2013). Kemp, R.; Never, B. Green transitions, industrial policy, and economic development. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Pol. 2017, 33, 66–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Altenburg, T.; Rodrik, D. Green industrial policy: Accelerating structural change towards wealthy green economies. In Green Industrial Policy. Concept, Policies, Country Experiences; Altenburg, T., Assamann, C., Eds.; UN Environment, German Development Institute: Bonn, Germany, 2017; pp. 1–20. Available online: https://www.un-page.org/files/public/green_industrial_policy_book_aw_web.pdf (accessed on 27 February 2020). Mazzucato, M.; Penna, C. The Brazilian Innovation System: A Mission-Oriented Policy Proposal; Centro de Gestão e Estudos Estratégicos (CGEE): Brasília, Brazil, 2016; Available online: https://www.cgee.org.br/documents/10195/909424/The_Brazilian_Innovation_System-CGEE-MazzucatoandPenna-FullReport.pdf. (accessed on 8 April 2016). Horbach, J. Determinants of environmental innovation—New evidence from German panel data sources. Res. Policy 2008, 37, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Triguero, Á.; Cuerva, M.C.; Álvarez-Aledo, C. Environmental Innovation and Employment: Drivers and Synergies. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Horbach, J. Empirical determinants of eco-innovation in European countries using the community innovation survey. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2016, 19, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Porter, M.E.; Linde, C. Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. J. Econ. Perspect. 1995, 9, 97–118. Available online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2138392 (accessed on 5 February 2013). [CrossRef] Freeman, C.; Soete, L. The Economics of Industrial Innovation, 3rd ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar] Bossle, M.B.; de Barcellos, M.D.; Vieira, L.M.; Sauvée, L. The drivers for adoption of eco-innovation. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 113, 861–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Rennings, K. Redefining innovation—ECO-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecol. Econ. 2000, 32, 319–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Jaffe, A.B.; Newell, R.G.; Stavins, R.N. A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy. Ecol. Econ. 2005, 54, 164–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] González-Benito, J.; González-Benito, Ó. Environmental proactivity and business performance: An empirical analysis. Omega 2005, 33, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Díaz-García, C.; Moreno, A.G.; Martínez, F.J.S. Eco-innovation: Insights from a literature review. Innovation 2015, 17, 6–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Ryszko, A. Proactive environmental strategy, technological eco-innovation and firm performance-case of Poland. Sustainability 2016, 8, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Ruiz, J.D.G.; Botero-Botero, S.; Duque-Grisales, E. Financial ECO-Innovation as a Mechanism for Fostering the Development of Sustainable Infrastructure Systems. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Barbieri, N.; Ghisetti, C.; Gilli, M.; Marin, G.; Nicolli, F. A survey of the literature on environmental innovation based on main path analysis. J. Econ. Surv. 2016, 33, 596–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Triguero, A.; Moreno-Mondéjar, L.; Davia, M.A. Drivers of different types of eco-innovation in European SMEs. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 92, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Hojnik, J.; Ruzzier, M. What drives eco-innovation? A review of an emerging literature. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2016, 19, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Del Río, P.; Peñasco, C.; Romero-Jordán, D. Distinctive Features of Environmental Innovators: An Econometric Analysis. Bus. Strat. Environ. 2015, 24, 361–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Dosi, G. Technical Change and Industrial Transformation: The Theory and an Application to the Semiconductor Industry; Macmillan Press: London, UK, 1984; p. 338. [Google Scholar] Kesidou, E.; Demirel, P. On the drivers of eco-innovations: Empirical evidence from the UK. Res. Policy 2012, 41, 862–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] De Marchi, V. Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Res. Policy 2012, 41, 614–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Pereira, R.M.; MacLennan, M.L.F.; Tiago, E.F. Interorganizational cooperation and eco-innovation: A literature review. Int. J. Innov. Sci. 2020, 12, 477–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Horbach, J. Do eco-innovations need specific regional characteristics? An econometric analysis for Germany. Rev. Reg. Res. 2014, 34, 23–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Paraschiv, D.M.; Nemoianu, E.L.; Langa, C.A.; Szabó, T. Eco-innovation, responsible leadership and organizational change for corporate sustainability. Amf. Econ. 2012, 32, 404–419. Available online: https://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/ArticolEN.aspx?CodArticol=1133 (accessed on 25 January 2018). Carrillo-Hermosilla, J.; Del Río, P.; Könnölä, T. Eco-Innovation: When Sustainability and Competitiveness Shake Hands, 1st ed.; Pal-Grave Macmillan: London, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar] Wagner, M. Empirical influence of environmental management on innovation: Evidence from Europe. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 66, 392–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Berrone, P.; Fosfuri, A.; Gelabert, L.; Gomez-Mejia, L.R. Necessity as the mother of ‘green’ inventions: Institutional pressures and environmental innovations. Strat. Manag. J. 2013, 34, 891–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Del Río, P.; Peñasco, C.; Romero-Jordán, D. What drives eco-innovators? A critical review of the empirical literature based on econometric methods. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 2158–2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Kemp, R.; Pontoglio, S. The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments—A typical case of the blind men and the elephant? Ecol. Econ. 2011, 72, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa de Inovação 2017: Notas Técnicas; IBGE: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2020. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa de Inovação 2017: Tabulação Especial; IBGE: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2020. Conceicao, P.; Heitor, M.V.; Vieira, P.S. Are environmental concerns drivers of innovation? Interpreting Portuguese innovation data to foster environmental foresight. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2006, 73, 266–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Queiroz, J.M.; Podcameni, M.G.V.B. Estratégia inovativa das firmas brasileiras: Convergência ou divergência com as questões ambientais? Rev. Bras. Inovação 2013, 13, 187–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Chapman, K. Environmental policy and industrial location in the United States. In Institutions and Geographical Patterns; Flowerdew, R., Ed.; Croom Helm: London, UK, 1982; pp. 141–168. [Google Scholar] Galili, T.; O’Callaghan, A.; Sidi, J.; Sievert, C. heatmaply: An R package for creating interactive cluster heatmaps for online publishing. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, 1600–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Rstudioteam. RStudio: Integrated Development for R [Computer Software]; RStudio: Boston, MA, USA, 2020; Available online: https://rstudio.com/ (accessed on 17 July 2020). Storme, T.; Derudder, B.; Dörry, S. Introducing cluster heatmaps to explore city/firm interactions in world cities. Comput. Environ. Urban. Syst. 2019, 76, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd ed.; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2005; p. 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Leitão, J.; De Brito, S.; Cubico, S. Eco-Innovation Influencers: Unveiling the Role of Lean Management Principles Adoption. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Horbach, J.; Oltra, V.; Belin, J. Determinants and Specificities of ECO-Innovations Compared to Other Innovations—An Econometric Analysis for the French and German Industry Based on the Community Innovation Survey. Ind. Innov. 2013, 20, 523–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Hájek, P.; Stejskal, J. R&D Cooperation and Knowledge Spillover Effects for Sustainable Business Innovation in the Chemical Industry. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Carrillo-Hermosilla, J.; del Río, P.; Könnölä, T. Diversity of eco-innovations: Reflections from selected case studies. J. Clean. Prod. 2010, 18, 1073–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Leitão, J.; Pereira, D.; De Brito, S. Inbound and Outbound Practices of Open Innovation and ECO-Innovation: Contrasting Bioeconomy and Non-Bioeconomy Firms. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2020, 6, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Oltra, V. Environmental Innovation and Industrial Dynamics: The Contributions of Evolutionary Economics. W. P. GREThA. 2008. Available online: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6297007.pdf (accessed on 27 October 2017). Ghisetti, C.; Pontoni, F. Investigating policy and R&D effects on environmental innovation: A meta-analysis. Ecol. Econ. 2015, 118, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Horbach, J.; Jacob, J. The relevance of personal characteristics and gender diversity for (eco-)innovation activities at the firm-level: Results from a linked employer-employee database in Germany. Bus. Strat. Environ. 2018, 27, 924–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Choi, H.; Yi, D. Environmental innovation inertia: Analyzing the business circumstances for environmental process and product innovations. Bus. Strat. Environ. 2018, 27, 1623–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Galera-Quiles, M.; Piedra-Muñoz, L.; Galdeano-Gómez, E.; Carreño-Ortega, A. A Review of ECO-Innovations and Exports Interrelationship, with Special Reference to International Agrifood Supply Chains. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Koeller, P.; Miranda, P.; Lustosa, M.; Podcameni, M. Ecoinovação: Revisitando o Conceito; Texto para Discussão 2556; IPEA: Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 2020; p. 60. Available online: http://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/bitstream/11058/9960/1/td_2556.pdf (accessed on 22 October 2020). Frondel, M.; Horbach, J.; Rennings, K. End-of-pipe or cleaner production? An empirical comparison of environmental innovation decisions across OECD countries. Bus. Strat. Environ. 2007, 16, 571–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Asheim, B.T.; Boschma, R.; Cooke, P. Constructing Regional Advantage: Platform Policies Based on Related Variety and Differentiated Knowledge Bases. Reg. Stud. 2011, 45, 893–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Mazzucato, M. Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy: Challenges and Opportunities; Working Paper; UCL—Inst. for Innov. and Public Purpose: London, UK, 2017; Available online: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/public-purpose/sites/public-purpose/files/moip-challenges-and-opportunities-working-paper-2017-1.pdf (accessed on 27 April 2019). Schot, J.; Steinmueller, W.E. Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Res. Policy 2018, 47, 1554–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Zagato, L. Ainda é possível que os países em desenvolvimento façam seu catching up no século XXI? Braz. J. Political Econ. 2019, 39, 527–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Edler, J.; Fagerberg, J. Innovation policy: What, why, and how. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 2017, 33, 2–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Schot, J.; Kanger, L. Deep transitions: Emergence, acceleration, stabilization and directionality. Res. Policy 2018, 47, 1045–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Aoyama, Y.; Murphy, J.T.; Hanson, S. Key Concepts in Economic Geography; SAGE Publications: London, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar] De Jesus, A.; Mendonça, S. Lost in Transition? Drivers and Barriers in the ECO-innovation Road to the Circular Economy. Ecol. Econ. 2018, 145, 75–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] González, P.D.R. The empirical analysis of the determinants for environmental technological change: A research agenda. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68, 861–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Tartaruga, I.; Sperotto, F. Rethinking Clusters in the Sense of Innovation, Inclusion, and Green Growth. In Rethinking Clusters; Sedita, S., Blasi, S., Eds.; Sustainable Development Goals Series; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Podcameni, M.G.; Cassiolato, J.E.; Lustosa, M.C.; Marcellino, I.; Rocha, P. Exploring the convergence between sustainability and local innovation systems from a southern perspective: What Brazilian empirical evidence has to offer. Local Econ. J. Local Econ. Policy Unit 2019, 34, 825–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Asheim, B. Differentiated knowledge bases and varieties of regional innovation systems. Innovation 2007, 20, 223–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Binz, C.; Truffer, B. Global Innovation Systems—A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts. Res. Policy 2017, 46, 1284–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Hidalgo, C.; Balland, P.A.; Boschma, R.; Delgado, M.; Feldman, M.; Frenken, K.; Glaeser, E.; He, C.; Kogler, D.; Morrison, A.; et al. The Principle of Relatedness. In Proceedings of the Unifying Themes in Complex. Systems IX, ICCS 2018, Springer Proceedings in Complexity, Cambridge, MA, USA, 22–27 July 2018; Morales, A., Braha, D., Minai, A., Bar-Yam, Y., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Coad, A.; Nightingale, P.; Stilgoe, J.; Vezzani, A. Editorial: The dark side of innovation. Ind. Innov. 2021, 28, 102–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/109149 |