Benabdelkader, Mohamed (2016): Productivité, innovation et politique sectorielle des industries de transformation au Maroc (1985-2013) : Fondements théoriques et proposition d’une méthodologie.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_70950.pdf Download (511kB) | Preview |
|
PDF (Plain Text Bibliography)
bibliography.txt - Bibliography Download (2kB) |
Abstract
The determinants of total factor productivity (TFP) of the manufacturing industries, in particular innovation and industrial policy, constituted the seminal contribution of Crépon, Duguet and Mairesse in the late 1990. This study aims to explain the TFP of the 5 branches composing the manufacturing industries in Morocco on the 1985-2013 period through its panel regression on innovation, trade openness and industrial policy variables, as well as their interactions, while testing the model assumptions in the light of the Moroccan reality. This study will also provide conclusions related to the relevance of the original model as well as extensions and implications for further research.
| Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
|---|---|
| Original Title: | Productivité, innovation et politique sectorielle des industries de transformation au Maroc (1985-2013) : Fondements théoriques et proposition d’une méthodologie |
| English Title: | Productivity, Innovation and Sectoral Policy of Manufacturing Industries in Morocco (1985-2013): Theory and Proposition of a Methodology |
| Language: | French |
| Keywords: | Crepon-Duguet-Mairesse model; industrial policy; innovation; panel data; total factor productivity |
| Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C33 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C51 - Model Construction and Estimation L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy > L52 - Industrial Policy ; Sectoral Planning Methods L - Industrial Organization > L6 - Industry Studies: Manufacturing O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O47 - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth ; Aggregate Productivity ; Cross-Country Output Convergence |
| Item ID: | 70950 |
| Depositing User: | Mohamed Benabdelkader |
| Date Deposited: | 24 Apr 2016 23:06 |
| Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2019 16:58 |
| References: | [1] BOUOIYOUR J. (2005), « Labour Productivity, Technological Gap and Spillovers: Evidence from Moroccan Manufacturing Industries », African Finance Journal, 7 (2), pp. 1-17. [2] BOUOIYOUR J. et TOUFIK S. (2007), « L'Impact des investissements Directs Étrangers et du Capital Humain sur la Productivité des Industries Manufacturières Marocaines », Région et Développement, n° 25, pp. 177-191. [3] CRÉPON B., DUGUET E., and MAIRESSE J. (1998), “Research, Innovation, and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 7 (3), pp. 115-156. [4] CRESPI G. and ZUÑIGA P. (2012) “Innovation and Productivity: Evidence from Six Latin American Countries”, World Development 40(2), pp. 273-290. [5] GRIFFITH R., REDDING S. and VAN REENEN J. (2004), “Mapping the Two Faces of R&D: Productivity Growth in a Panel of OECD Industries”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 86, No. 4, pp. 883-895. [6] GRILICHES Z. (1979), “Issues in Assessing the Contribution of R&D to Productivity Growth,” Bell Journal of Economics, 10, pp. 92-116. [7] GRILICHES Z. (1998), R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, National Bureau of Economic Research, University of Chicago Press. [8] GRILICHES Z. and MAIRESSE J. (1984), “Productivity and R&D at the firm level.” In R&D, patents, and productivity, ed. Z. Griliches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [9] HALL B. and MAIRESSE J. (2006), “Empirical studies of innovation in the knowledge-driven economy,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 15(4-5), June, pp. 289-299. [10] HECKMAN, J. J. (1979), “Sample selection bias as a specification error”, Econometrica 47, pp. 153-161. [11] OCDE (2002), Mesurer la productivité - Manuel de l'OCDE : Mesurer la Croissance de la Productivité par Secteur et pour l'Ensemble de l'Économie, Éditions OCDE, Paris. [12] PAKES A. and GRILICHES Z. (1980), “Patents and R and D at the Firm Level: A First Look,” NBER Working Paper N° 0561, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [13] ROMER P. (1990), “Endogenous Technological Change.” Journal of Political Economy 98 (5), pp. 1002-1037. [14] SAKATA Z. et KOLSTER J. (2014), « Innovation et Productivité : Analyse Empirique pour les Pays de l'Afrique du Nord », Note économique - Banque Africaine de Développement. [15] Y WEI and X LIU (2006) “Productivity Spillovers from R&D, Exports and FDI in China's Manufacturing Sector” Journal of International Business Studies, 37, pp. 544-557. [16] YIH-CHYI CHUANG and CHI-MEI LIN, (1999) “Foreign Direct Investment, R&D and Spillover Efficiency: Evidence from Taiwan's Manufacturing Firms,” Journal of Development Studies, vol. 35(4), pp. 117-137. |
| URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/70950 |
All papers reproduced by permission. Reproduction and distribution subject to the approval of the copyright owners.
| View Item |