List of Wikimedians by MBTI type
Wikipedians by Myers-Briggs Type Indicator preferences:
Proportions in Wikimedia (20:45, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC))
[edit]If anyone has any questions about psychological type or temperament you can leave a message on my talk page. I can suggest good books, as well, or address skeptical questions (it's not all peaches!). --Alterego 05:38, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Wikipedia comparative breakdown, 2005.vii.16
[edit]| ISTJ 11.6% |
ISFJ 13.8% |
INFJ 1.5% |
INTJ 2.1% |
I**J 29.0% |
I*** 50.9% |
***J 54.2% |
| ISTP 5.4% |
ISFP 8.8% |
INFP 4.4% |
INTP 3.3% |
I**P 21.9% |
***P 46.0% | |
| ESTP 4.3% |
ESFP 8.5% |
ENFP 8.1% |
ENTP 3.2% |
E**P 24.1% |
E*** 49.3% | |
| ESTJ 8.7% |
ESFJ 12.3% |
ENFJ 2.4% |
ENTJ 1.8% |
E**J 25.2% |
– | |
| *ST* 30.0% |
*SF* 43.4% |
*NF* 16.4% |
*NT* 10.4% |
|||
| *S** 73.4% |
*N** 26.8% | |||||
| **T* 40.4% |
**F* 59.8% |
– | ||||
| ISTJ 4 ½ / 145 3.1% δ - 73% |
ISFJ 0 / 145 0.0% δ - 100% |
INFJ 7 ½ / 145 5.2% δ + 245% |
INTJ 30 ¼ / 145 20.9% δ + 893% |
I**J 42 ¼ / 145 29.1% no change |
I*** 107 ¾ / 145 74.3% δ + 46% |
***J 56 / 145 38.6% δ - 29% |
| ISTP 7 ¾ / 145 5.3% no change |
ISFP 0 / 145 0.0% δ - 100% |
INFP 16 ½ / 145 11.4% δ + 159% |
INTP 41 ¼ / 145 28.4% δ + 762% |
I**P 65 ½ / 145 45.2% δ + 106% |
***P 89 / 145 61.4% δ + 33% | |
| ESTP 2 / 145 1.3% δ - 68% |
ESFP 0 ½ / 145 0.3% δ - 96% |
ENFP 10 / 145 6.9% δ - 15% |
ENTP 11 / 145 7.6% δ + 137% |
E**P 23 ½ / 145 16.2% δ - 33% |
E*** 37 ¼ / 145 25.7% δ - 48% | |
| ESTJ 0 ½ / 145 0.3% δ - 96% |
ESFJ 3 / 145 2.1% δ - 83% |
ENFJ 4 ½ / 145 3.1% δ + 29% |
ENTJ 5 ¾ / 145 4.0% δ + 120% |
E**J 13 ¾ / 145 9.5% δ - 62% |
– | |
| *ST* 14 ¾ / 145 10.1% δ - 66% |
*SF* 3 ½ / 145 2.4% δ - 94% |
*NF* 38 ½ / 145 26.6% δ + 62% |
*NT* 88 ¼ / 145 60.8% δ + 485% |
|||
| *S** 18 ¼ / 145 12.6% δ - 83% |
*N** 126 ¾ / 145 87.4% δ + 326% | |||||
| **T* 103 / 145 71.0% δ + 76% |
**F* 42 / 145 29.0% δ - 52% |
– | ||||
Note that the data sample is both small and self-selecting, and so this analysis shouldn't be used for anything. :-) James F. (talk) 12:35, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
- I dunno, I'd say the huge overrepresentation of *NT* is statistically significant. It's easier to believe that NT is far overrepresented on Wikipedia than it is to believe that NT people are far more likely to wander across and participate on this page.
- Isomorphic 09:08, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
- A better reading of the data is that N and T preferences individually are more represented, with N being more represented than T. This also helps explain the utter lack of the SF preference pair. --Alterego 00:33, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
- Brian, I've drawn out the single-item levels for contrast, as you (implicitly) suggest I should have originally (;-)), as I feel that it shows your point better.
- James F. (talk) 06:40, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
External links
[edit]- (only a qualified practitioner can give the real test)