Property talk:P9702
Latest comment: 7 months ago by Kirilloparma in topic Formatter URL is broken
Documentation
Gameblog.fr game ID
identifier of a video game in the Gameblog.fr database
identifier of a video game in the Gameblog.fr database
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Type “video game (Q7889), group of video games often treated as a singular game (Q116779426)”: item must contain property “instance of (P31)” with classes “video game (Q7889), group of video games often treated as a singular game (Q116779426)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P9702#Type Q7889, Q116779426, SPARQL
Distinct values: this property likely contains a value that is different from all other items. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P9702#Unique value, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value)
Single value: this property generally contains a single value. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P9702#Single value, SPARQL
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P9702#Format, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P9702#Format, SPARQL
Scope is as main value (Q54828448): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P9702#Scope, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P9702#Entity types
Label required in languages: fr: Entities using this property should have labels in one of the following languages: fr (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P9702#Label in 'fr' language, search, SPARQL
Formatter URL is broken
editIt seems like this formatter URL no longer works for some video games since it gives 404 error (example). Strange things happen to IDs too. For example, The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion (Q49607) was the first ID in the Gameblog database (https://www.gameblog.fr/jeux/1_-), however it now gives a different ID for that game.
By the way, I tried to fix the formatter URL, but to no avail. It only works if you change it from https://www.gameblog.fr/jeux/$1_- to https://www.gameblog.fr/jeu-video/jeux/$1. @Jean-Frédéric: What do you think? Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 14:33, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for noticing and the ping. Looks like they completely changed their ID system :-/ Jean-Fred (talk) 18:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- Ok, so:
- at least one game (the one you found Uncharted: Legacy of Thieves Collection (Q108482649)) kept its ID, but the old formatter URL does not resolve.
- most games have a new ID, but the old formatter URL resolves as a redirect to the new ID.
- So, great − we can’t just update the formatter URL (as it will break most links) ; and we can’t just leave the old one and use the redirect (as at least one game, but presumably more, will then not resolve).
- I see they have a Discord, will try asking there.
- Jean-Fred (talk) 18:21, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- At this point, I wonder whether we should make a new property. Jean-Fred (talk) 20:26, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Jean-Frédéric: Sorry for such a late reply. Since the situation hasn't changed much, yes, I think a new property is unfortunately the only way out, and this property should be marked as "former scheme" as we did in the MobyGames case. Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 03:34, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- At this point, I wonder whether we should make a new property. Jean-Fred (talk) 20:26, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Ok, so: