Abstract
Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most deleterious among all types of DNA damage that can occur in the cell. These breaks arise from both endogenous (e.g., DNA replication stress) and exogenous insults (e.g., ionizing radiation). DSBs are principally repaired by one of two major pathways: nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR). NHEJ is an error-prone process that can occur in all phases of the cell cycle, while HR is limited to the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle when a sister chromatid is available as a template for error-free repair. The first step in HR is “DNA end resection,” a process during which the broken DNA end is converted into a long stretch of 3′-ended single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). In recent years, DNA end resection has been identified as a pivotal step that controls “repair pathway choice,” i.e., the appropriate choice between NHEJ and HR for DSB repair. Therefore, methods to quantitatively or semiquantitatively assess DNA end resection have gained importance in laboratories working on DNA repair. In this chapter, we describe two simple immunofluorescence-based techniques to monitor DNA end resection in mammalian cells. The first technique involves immuno-detection of replication protein A (RPA), an ssDNA-binding protein that binds to resected DNA. The second technique involves labeling of genomic DNA with 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU) that can be detected by anti-BrdU antibody only after the DNA becomes single stranded due to resection. These methods are not complicated, do not involve sophisticated instrumentation or reporter constructs, and can be applied to most mammalian cell lines and, therefore, should be of broad utility as simple ways of monitoring DNA end resection in vivo.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wyman C, Kanaar R (2006) DNA double-strand break repair: all’s well that ends well. Annu Rev Genet 40:363–383
Lieber MR (2010) The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway. Annu Rev Biochem 79:181–211
Heyer WD, Ehmsen KT, Liu J (2010) Regulation of homologous recombination in eukaryotes. Annu Rev Genet 44:113–139
Chapman JR, Taylor MR, Boulton SJ (2012) Playing the end game: DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice. Mol Cell 47:497–510
Shrivastav M, De Haro LP, Nickoloff JA (2008) Regulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice. Cell Res 18:134–147
Symington LS, Gautier J (2011) Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. Annu Rev Genet 45:247–271
Huertas P (2010) DNA resection in eukaryotes: deciding how to fix the break. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17:11–16
Fanning E, Klimovich V, Nager AR (2006) A dynamic model for replication protein A (RPA) function in DNA processing pathways. Nucleic Acids Res 34:4126–4137
Gravel S, Chapman JR, Magill C et al (2008) DNA helicases Sgs1 and BLM promote DNA double-strand break resection. Genes Dev 22:2767–2772
Mimitou EP, Symington LS (2008) Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 455:770–774
Zhu Z, Chung WH, Shim EY et al (2008) Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell 134:981–994
Makharashvili N, Tubbs AT, Yang SH et al (2014) Catalytic and noncatalytic roles of the CtIP endonuclease in double-strand break end resection. Mol Cell 54:1022–1033
Nicolette ML, Lee K, Guo Z et al (2010) Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 and Sae2 promote 5′ strand resection of DNA double-strand breaks. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17:1478–1485
Nimonkar AV, Genschel J, Kinoshita E et al (2011) BLM-DNA2-RPA-MRN and EXO1-BLM-RPA-MRN constitute two DNA end resection machineries for human DNA break repair. Genes Dev 25:350–362
Bolderson E, Tomimatsu N, Richard DJ et al (2010) Phosphorylation of Exo1 modulates homologous recombination repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res 38:1821–1831
Tomimatsu N, Mukherjee B, Deland K et al (2012) Exo1 plays a major role in DNA end resection in humans and influences double-strand break repair and damage signaling decisions. DNA Repair (Amst) 11:441–448
Daley JM, Sung P (2014) 53BP1, BRCA1, and the choice between recombination and end joining at DNA double-strand breaks. Mol Cell Biol 34:1380–1388
Chen X, Niu H, Chung WH et al (2011) Cell cycle regulation of DNA double-strand break end resection by Cdk1-dependent Dna2 phosphorylation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18:1015–1019
Ferretti LP, Lafranchi L, Sartori AA (2013) Controlling DNA-end resection: a new task for CDKs. Front Genet 4:99
Huertas P, Cortes-Ledesma F, Sartori AA et al (2008) CDK targets Sae2 to control DNA-end resection and homologous recombination. Nature 455:689–692
Tomimatsu N, Mukherjee B, Catherine HM et al (2014) Phosphorylation of EXO1 by CDKs 1 and 2 regulates DNA end resection and repair pathway choice. Nat Commun 5:3561
Shiotani B, Zou L (2009) Single-stranded DNA orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR switch at DNA breaks. Mol Cell 33:547–558
Mirzoeva OK, Petrini JH (2001) DNA damage-dependent nuclear dynamics of the Mre11 complex. Mol Cell Biol 21:281–288
Kaidi A, Weinert BT, Choudhary C et al (2010) Human SIRT6 promotes DNA end resection through CtIP deacetylation. Science 329:1348–1353
Hu Y, Scully R, Sobhian B et al (2011) RAP80-directed tuning of BRCA1 homologous recombination function at ionizing radiation-induced nuclear foci. Genes Dev 25:685–700
Cuadrado M, Martinez-Pastor B, Murga M et al (2006) ATM regulates ATR chromatin loading in response to DNA double-strand breaks. J Exp Med 203:297–303
Raderschall E, Golub EI, Haaf T (1999) Nuclear foci of mammalian recombination proteins are located at single-stranded DNA regions formed after DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:1921–1926
Tomimatsu N, Mukherjee B, Burma S (2009) Distinct roles of ATR and DNA-PKcs in triggering DNA damage responses in ATM-deficient cells. EMBO Rep 10:629–635
Costelloe T, Louge R, Tomimatsu N et al (2012) The yeast Fun30 and human SMARCAD1 chromatin remodellers promote DNA end resection. Nature 489:581–584
Zhou Y, Caron P, Legube G et al (2014) Quantitation of DNA double-strand break resection intermediates in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res 42:e19
Acknowledgments
SB is supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (RO1 CA149461) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX13AI13G).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Mukherjee, B., Tomimatsu, N., Burma, S. (2015). Immunofluorescence-Based Methods to Monitor DNA End Resection. In: Oslowski, C. (eds) Stress Responses. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1292. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2522-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2522-3_5
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2521-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2522-3
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols