[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pca710.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Burak Can

Personal Details

First Name:Burak
Middle Name:
Last Name:Can
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pca710
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
http://researchers-sbe.unimaas.nl/canburak/
Terminal Degree: (from RePEc Genealogy)

Affiliation

School of Business and Economics
Maastricht University

Maastricht, Netherlands
http://www.maastrichtuniversity.nl/sbe
RePEc:edi:femaanl (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles Chapters

Working papers

  1. Burak Can & Jens Leth Hougaard & Mohsen Pourpouneh, 2021. "On Reward Sharing in Blockchain Mining Pools," Papers 2107.05302, arXiv.org.
  2. Burak Can & Mohsen Pourpouneh & Ton Storcken, 2020. "Cost of transformation: a measure on matchings," IFRO Working Paper 2020/10, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
  3. Can, Burak, 2017. "Economic Design of Things," Research Memorandum 028, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
  4. Burak Can & Peter Csoka & Emre Ergin, 2017. "How to choose a non-manipulable delegation?," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 1713, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
  5. Can, Burak & Csóka, Péter & Ergin, Emre, 2017. "How to choose a delegation for a peace conference?," Research Memorandum 008, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
  6. Can, Burak & Ergin, Emre & Pourpouneh, Mohsen, 2017. "Condorcet versus participation criterion in social welfare rules," Research Memorandum 020, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
  7. Burak Can & Ali Ihsan Ozkes & Ton Storcken, 2017. "Generalized Measures of Polarization in Preferences," AMSE Working Papers 1734, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
  8. Walter Bossert & Burak Can & Conchita D'Ambrosio, 2016. "A head-count measure of rank mobility and its directional decomposition," Working Papers 424, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
  9. Can, B. & Storcken, A.J.A., 2015. "Comparing orders, rankings, queues, tournaments and lists," Research Memorandum 020, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
  10. Burak Can & Ali Ihsan Ozkes & Ton Storcken, 2015. "Measuring polarization in preferences," Post-Print hal-01457336, HAL.
  11. Can, B. & Storcken, A.J.A., 2013. "A re-characterization of the Kemeny distance," Research Memorandum 009, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
  12. Can, B., 2013. "Distance rationalizability of scoring rules," Research Memorandum 028, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
  13. Can, B. & Erdem, O., 2013. "Present-bias in different income groups," Research Memorandum 008, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
  14. Can, B., 2012. "Weighted distances between preferences," Research Memorandum 056, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
  15. Can, B. & Storcken, A.J.A., 2011. "Impossibilities with Kemeny updating," Research Memorandum 049, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
  16. Can, B. & Storcken, A.J.A., 2011. "Update monotone preference rules," Research Memorandum 048, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
  17. Burak Can & Bettina Klaus, 2010. "Consistency and Population Sensitivity Properties in Marriage and Roommate Markets," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 10.08, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.

Articles

  1. Can, Burak & Pourpouneh, Mohsen & Storcken, Ton, 2023. "Distance on matchings: an axiomatic approach," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 18(2), May.
  2. Burak Can & Mohsen Pourpouneh & Ton Storcken, 2022. "An axiomatic re-characterization of the Kemeny rule," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(3), pages 447-467, September.
  3. Can, Burak & Leth Hougaard, Jens & Pourpouneh, Mohsen, 2022. "On reward sharing in blockchain mining pools," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 274-298.
  4. Burak Can & Péter Csóka & Emre Ergin, 2021. "How to choose a fair delegation?," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 72(4), pages 1339-1373, November.
  5. Burak Can & Mohsen Pourpouneh & Ton Storcken, 2021. "An axiomatic characterization of the Slater rule," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 56(4), pages 835-853, May.
  6. Walter Bossert & Burak Can & Conchita D'Ambrosio, 2018. "A Head‐count Measure of Rank Mobility and its Directional Decomposition," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 85(340), pages 793-807, October.
  7. Can, Burak & Storcken, Ton, 2018. "A re-characterization of the Kemeny distance," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 112-116.
  8. Walter Bossert & Burak Can & Conchita D’Ambrosio, 2016. "Measuring rank mobility with variable population size," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 46(4), pages 917-931, April.
  9. Can, Burak & Ozkes, Ali Ihsan & Storcken, Ton, 2015. "Measuring polarization in preferences," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 76-79.
  10. Can, Burak, 2014. "Weighted distances between preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 109-115.
  11. Burak Can & Bettina Klaus, 2013. "Consistency and population sensitivity properties in marriage and roommate markets," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 41(4), pages 835-862, October.
  12. Burak Can & Orhan Erdem, 2013. "Income groups and long term investment," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 33(4), pages 3014-3022.
  13. Can, Burak & Storcken, Ton, 2013. "Update monotone preference rules," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 136-149.
  14. Can, Burak & Storcken, Ton, 2012. "Impossibilities with Kemeny updating," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 229-231.
  15. Can, Burak & Sanver, M. Remzi, 2009. "Stereotype formation as trait aggregation," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 226-237, September.
  16. Burak Can & Bora Erdamar & M. Sanver, 2009. "Expected Utility Consistent Extensions of Preferences," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 67(2), pages 123-144, August.

Chapters

  1. Burak Can, 2015. "Distance Rationalizability of Scoring Rules," Studies in Choice and Welfare, in: Constanze Binder & Giulio Codognato & Miriam Teschl & Yongsheng Xu (ed.), Individual and Collective Choice and Social Welfare, edition 127, pages 171-178, Springer.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Burak Can & Jens Leth Hougaard & Mohsen Pourpouneh, 2021. "On Reward Sharing in Blockchain Mining Pools," Papers 2107.05302, arXiv.org.

    Cited by:

    1. José Parra-Moyano & Gregor Reich & Karl Schmedders, 2024. "A Note on the Non-proportionality of Winning Probabilities in Bitcoin," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 64(3), pages 1697-1714, September.

  2. Can, Burak, 2017. "Economic Design of Things," Research Memorandum 028, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).

    Cited by:

    1. Kónya Veronika, 2018. "Financial incentives regarding the regulation of environmental issues," Prosperitas, Budapest Business University, vol. 5(4), pages 17-24.

  3. Burak Can & Peter Csoka & Emre Ergin, 2017. "How to choose a non-manipulable delegation?," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 1713, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.

    Cited by:

    1. Csóka, Péter & Kondor, Gábor, 2019. "Delegációk igazságos kiválasztása társadalmi választások elméletével [Choosing a fair delegation by social choice theory]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 771-787.

  4. Burak Can & Ali Ihsan Ozkes & Ton Storcken, 2017. "Generalized Measures of Polarization in Preferences," AMSE Working Papers 1734, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.

    Cited by:

    1. Huremović, Kenan & Ozkes, Ali I., 2022. "Polarization in networks: Identification–alienation framework," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).

  5. Can, B. & Storcken, A.J.A., 2015. "Comparing orders, rankings, queues, tournaments and lists," Research Memorandum 020, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).

    Cited by:

    1. Gilbert Laffond & Jean Lainé & M. Remzi Sanver, 2020. "Metrizable preferences over preferences," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 55(1), pages 177-191, June.
    2. Mihir Bhattacharya & Nicolas Gravel, 2019. "Is the preference of the majority representative?," AMSE Working Papers 1921, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
    3. Walter Bossert & Burak Can & Conchita D’Ambrosio, 2016. "Measuring rank mobility with variable population size," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 46(4), pages 917-931, April.
    4. Baser, Onur, 2021. "Population density index and its use for distribution of Covid-19: A case study using Turkish data," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 148-154.

  6. Burak Can & Ali Ihsan Ozkes & Ton Storcken, 2015. "Measuring polarization in preferences," Post-Print hal-01457336, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Huremović, Kenan & Ozkes, Ali I., 2022. "Polarization in networks: Identification–alienation framework," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    2. Burak Can & Ali Ihsan Ozkes & Ton Storcken, 2017. "Generalized Measures of Polarization in Preferences," Working Papers halshs-01597720, HAL.
    3. Alexander Karpov, 2020. "The likelihood of single-peaked preferences under classic and new probability distribution assumptions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 55(4), pages 629-644, December.
    4. Jansen, C. & Schollmeyer, G. & Augustin, T., 2018. "A probabilistic evaluation framework for preference aggregation reflecting group homogeneity," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 49-62.
    5. Karpov, Alexander, 2016. "Preference diversity orderings," Working Papers 0610, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    6. Salvatore Barbaro, 2021. "A social-choice perspective on authoritarianism and political polarization," Working Papers 2108, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.

  7. Can, B. & Storcken, A.J.A., 2013. "A re-characterization of the Kemeny distance," Research Memorandum 009, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).

    Cited by:

    1. Gilbert Laffond & Jean Lainé & M. Remzi Sanver, 2020. "Metrizable preferences over preferences," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 55(1), pages 177-191, June.
    2. Burak Can & Mohsen Pourpouneh & Ton Storcken, 2020. "Cost of transformation: a measure on matchings," IFRO Working Paper 2020/10, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
    3. Hiroki Nishimura & Efe A. Ok, 2022. "A class of dissimilarity semimetrics for preference relations," Papers 2203.04418, arXiv.org.
    4. Mihir Bhattacharya & Nicolas Gravel, 2019. "Is the preference of the majority representative?," AMSE Working Papers 1921, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
    5. Can, B., 2013. "Distance rationalizability of scoring rules," Research Memorandum 068, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    6. Kikuchi, Kazuya, 2016. "Comparing preference orders: Asymptotic independence," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-5.
    7. Burak Can & Peter Csoka & Emre Ergin, 2017. "How to choose a non-manipulable delegation?," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 1713, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    8. Saeideh Babashahi & Paul Hansen & Ronald Peeters, 2023. "External validity of multi-criteria preference data obtained from non-random sampling: measuring cohesiveness within and between groups," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 939-949, June.
    9. Walter Bossert & Burak Can & Conchita D'Ambrosio, 2018. "A Head‐count Measure of Rank Mobility and its Directional Decomposition," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 85(340), pages 793-807, October.
    10. László Csató, 2017. "On the ranking of a Swiss system chess team tournament," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 254(1), pages 17-36, July.
    11. Walter Bossert & Burak Can & Conchita D’Ambrosio, 2016. "Measuring rank mobility with variable population size," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 46(4), pages 917-931, April.
    12. Can, Burak, 2014. "Weighted distances between preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 109-115.
    13. Burak Can & Mohsen Pourpouneh & Ton Storcken, 2021. "An axiomatic characterization of the Slater rule," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 56(4), pages 835-853, May.
    14. Can, Burak & Pourpouneh, Mohsen & Storcken, Ton, 2023. "Distance on matchings: an axiomatic approach," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 18(2), May.
    15. Roland Pongou & Bertrand Tchantcho, 2021. "Round-Robin Political Tournaments: Abstention, Truthful Equilibria, and Effective Power," Working Papers 2110E Classification- D72, University of Ottawa, Department of Economics.
    16. Can, Burak & Csóka, Péter & Ergin, Emre, 2017. "How to choose a delegation for a peace conference?," Research Memorandum 008, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    17. Dinko Dimitrov & Emiliya A. Lazarova & Shao-Chin Sung, 2016. "Inducing stability in hedonic games," University of East Anglia School of Economics Working Paper Series 2016-09, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    18. Irina Georgescu & Jani Kinnunen, 2015. "Distances of Fuzzy Choice Functions," New Mathematics and Natural Computation (NMNC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(03), pages 249-265.
    19. Uuganbaatar Ninjbat, 2018. "Impossibility theorems with countably many individuals," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 9(3), pages 333-350, August.
    20. Burak Can & Péter Csóka & Emre Ergin, 2021. "How to choose a fair delegation?," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 72(4), pages 1339-1373, November.
    21. Madhuparna Karmokar & Souvik Roy, 2023. "The structure of (local) ordinal Bayesian incentive compatible random rules," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 76(1), pages 111-152, July.
    22. Stergios Athanasoglou & Somouaoga Bonkoungou & Lars Ehlers, 2023. "Strategy-proof preference aggregation and the anonymity-neutrality tradeoff," Working Papers 519, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics.
    23. Ali Ihsan Ozkes, 2013. "Preferential Polarization Measures," Working Papers hal-00875949, HAL.
    24. Can, B. & Storcken, A.J.A., 2015. "Comparing orders, rankings, queues, tournaments and lists," Research Memorandum 020, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).

  8. Can, B., 2013. "Distance rationalizability of scoring rules," Research Memorandum 028, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).

    Cited by:

    1. Can, Burak, 2014. "Weighted distances between preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 109-115.

  9. Can, B. & Erdem, O., 2013. "Present-bias in different income groups," Research Memorandum 008, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).

    Cited by:

    1. Incekara-Hafalir, Elif & Linardi, Sera, 2017. "Awareness of low self-control: Theory and evidence from a homeless shelter," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 39-54.
    2. Massimo Filippini & Nilkanth Kumar & Suchita Srinivasan, 2021. "Behavioral Anomalies and Fuel Efficiency: Evidence from Motorcycles in Nepal," CER-ETH Economics working paper series 21/353, CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research (CER-ETH) at ETH Zurich.

  10. Can, B., 2012. "Weighted distances between preferences," Research Memorandum 056, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. Gilbert Laffond & Jean Lainé & M. Remzi Sanver, 2020. "Metrizable preferences over preferences," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 55(1), pages 177-191, June.
    2. Burak Can & Mohsen Pourpouneh & Ton Storcken, 2020. "Cost of transformation: a measure on matchings," IFRO Working Paper 2020/10, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
    3. Hiroki Nishimura & Efe A. Ok, 2022. "A class of dissimilarity semimetrics for preference relations," Papers 2203.04418, arXiv.org.
    4. Huremović, Kenan & Ozkes, Ali I., 2022. "Polarization in networks: Identification–alienation framework," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    5. Kikuchi, Kazuya, 2016. "Comparing preference orders: Asymptotic independence," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-5.
    6. Can, B. & Storcken, A.J.A., 2013. "A re-characterization of the Kemeny distance," Research Memorandum 009, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    7. Herings, P. Jean-Jacques & Meshalkin, Andrey & Predtetchinski, Arkadi, 2017. "A one-period memory folk theorem for multilateral bargaining games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 185-198.
    8. László Csató, 2017. "On the ranking of a Swiss system chess team tournament," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 254(1), pages 17-36, July.
    9. Matteo Brunelli & Michele Fedrizzi, 2019. "A general formulation for some inconsistency indices of pairwise comparisons," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 274(1), pages 155-169, March.
    10. Burak Can & Mohsen Pourpouneh & Ton Storcken, 2022. "An axiomatic re-characterization of the Kemeny rule," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(3), pages 447-467, September.
    11. Antonella Plaia & Simona Buscemi & Johannes Fürnkranz & Eneldo Loza Mencía, 2022. "Comparing Boosting and Bagging for Decision Trees of Rankings," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 39(1), pages 78-99, March.
    12. Karpov, Alexander, 2016. "Preference diversity orderings," Working Papers 0610, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    13. Ausloos, Marcel, 2024. "Hierarchy selection: New team ranking indicators for cyclist multi-stage races," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(2), pages 807-816.
    14. João V. Ferreira & Erik Schokkaert & Benoît Tarroux, 2023. "How group deliberation affects individual distributional preferences: An experimental study," Working Papers 2301, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
    15. Lederer, Patrick, 2024. "Bivariate scoring rules: Unifying the characterizations of positional scoring rules and Kemeny's rule," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    16. Daniele Checchi & Gianni De Fraja & Stefano Verzillo, 2018. "Selections from ordered sets," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 50(4), pages 677-703, April.
    17. Gyimesi, András, 2021. "Hosszú távú versenyegyensúly egy csapatsportliga közgazdasági modelljében [Long-term competitive balance in an economic model of a team sports league]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(6), pages 585-616.
    18. Can, B. & Storcken, A.J.A., 2015. "Comparing orders, rankings, queues, tournaments and lists," Research Memorandum 020, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).

  11. Can, B. & Storcken, A.J.A., 2011. "Impossibilities with Kemeny updating," Research Memorandum 049, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. Uuganbaatar Ninjbat, 2015. "Impossibility theorems are modified and unified," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 45(4), pages 849-866, December.
    2. Can, Burak & Storcken, Ton, 2013. "Update monotone preference rules," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 136-149.

  12. Can, B. & Storcken, A.J.A., 2011. "Update monotone preference rules," Research Memorandum 048, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. Mahajne, Muhammad & Volij, Oscar, 2022. "Pairwise consensus and the Borda rule," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 17-21.
    2. Edurne Falcó & Madhuparna Karmokar & Souvik Roy & Ton Storcken, 2020. "On update monotone, continuous, and consistent collective evaluation rules," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 55(4), pages 759-776, December.
    3. Uuganbaatar Ninjbat, 2015. "Impossibility theorems are modified and unified," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 45(4), pages 849-866, December.
    4. HORAN, Sean & SPRUMONT, Yves, 2015. "Welfare criteria from choice: the sequential solution," Cahiers de recherche 2015-01, Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques.
    5. Daniela Bubboloni & Michele Gori, 2014. "Anonymous and neutral majority rules," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 43(2), pages 377-401, August.
    6. Burak Can & Mohsen Pourpouneh & Ton Storcken, 2021. "An axiomatic characterization of the Slater rule," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 56(4), pages 835-853, May.
    7. Mostapha Diss & Michele Gori, 2020. "Majority properties of positional social preference correspondences," Working Papers 2020-06, CRESE.
    8. Burak Can & Mohsen Pourpouneh & Ton Storcken, 2022. "An axiomatic re-characterization of the Kemeny rule," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(3), pages 447-467, September.
    9. Can, B. & Storcken, A.J.A., 2011. "Impossibilities with Kemeny updating," Research Memorandum 049, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    10. Gersbach, Hans, 2017. "Flexible Majority Rules in democracyville: A guided tour," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 37-43.
    11. Horan, Sean & Sprumont, Yves, 2016. "Welfare criteria from choice: An axiomatic analysis," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 56-70.
    12. Lederer, Patrick, 2024. "Bivariate scoring rules: Unifying the characterizations of positional scoring rules and Kemeny's rule," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    13. Csóka, Péter & Kondor, Gábor, 2019. "Delegációk igazságos kiválasztása társadalmi választások elméletével [Choosing a fair delegation by social choice theory]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 771-787.
    14. Daniela Bubboloni & Michele Gori, 2013. "Anonymous, neutral and reversal symmetric majority rules," Working Papers - Mathematical Economics 2013-05, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.

  13. Burak Can & Bettina Klaus, 2010. "Consistency and Population Sensitivity Properties in Marriage and Roommate Markets," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 10.08, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.

    Cited by:

    1. Bettina Klaus, 2010. "Competition and Resource Sensitivity in Marriage and Roommate Markets," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 10.03, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
    2. Mehmet Karakaya & Bettina Klaus, 2015. "Hedonic Coalition Formation Games with Variable Populations: Core Characterizations and (Im)Possibilities," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 15.01, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
    3. Paula Jaramillo, 2014. "Minimal consistent enlargements of the immediate acceptance rule and the top trading cycles rule in school choice," Documentos CEDE 12343, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    4. Péter Biró & Elena Inarra & Elena Molis, 2014. "A new solution for the roommate problem: The Q-stable matchings," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 1422, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    5. Biró, Péter & Iñarra, Elena & Molis, Elena, 2016. "A new solution concept for the roommate problem: Q-stable matchings," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 74-82.
    6. Bettina Klaus, 2013. "Consistency and its Converse for Roommate Markets," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 13.12, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
    7. Kasajima, Yoichi & Toda, Manabu, 2024. "Singles monotonicity and stability in one-to-one matching problems," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 269-286.
    8. Sheida Etemadidavan & Andrew J. Collins, 2021. "An Empirical Distribution of the Number of Subsets in the Core Partitions of Hedonic Games," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Duygu Nizamogullari & İpek Özkal-Sanver, 2022. "A note on roommate problems with a limited number of rooms," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(4), pages 553-560, December.
    10. Yoichi Kasajima & Manabu Toda, 2021. "Singles monotonicity and stability in one-to-one matching problems," Working Papers 2023-1, Waseda University, Faculty of Political Science and Economics.
    11. Nizamogullari, Duygu & Özkal-Sanver, İpek, 2014. "Characterization of the core in full domain marriage problems," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 34-42.

Articles

  1. Can, Burak & Leth Hougaard, Jens & Pourpouneh, Mohsen, 2022. "On reward sharing in blockchain mining pools," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 274-298.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Burak Can & Mohsen Pourpouneh & Ton Storcken, 2021. "An axiomatic characterization of the Slater rule," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 56(4), pages 835-853, May.

    Cited by:

    1. Burak Can & Mohsen Pourpouneh & Ton Storcken, 2022. "An axiomatic re-characterization of the Kemeny rule," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(3), pages 447-467, September.

  3. Can, Burak & Storcken, Ton, 2018. "A re-characterization of the Kemeny distance," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 112-116.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  4. Walter Bossert & Burak Can & Conchita D’Ambrosio, 2016. "Measuring rank mobility with variable population size," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 46(4), pages 917-931, April.

    Cited by:

    1. Elena Bárcena & Olga Cantó, 2018. "A simple subgroup decomposable measure of downward (and upward) income mobility," Working Papers 472, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    2. Mihir Bhattacharya & Nicolas Gravel, 2019. "Is the preference of the majority representative?," AMSE Working Papers 1921, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
    3. Saeideh Babashahi & Paul Hansen & Ronald Peeters, 2023. "External validity of multi-criteria preference data obtained from non-random sampling: measuring cohesiveness within and between groups," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 939-949, June.
    4. Walter Bossert & Burak Can & Conchita D'Ambrosio, 2018. "A Head‐count Measure of Rank Mobility and its Directional Decomposition," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 85(340), pages 793-807, October.
    5. Roberto Ghiselli Ricci, 2019. "An axiomatic characterization of a class of rank mobility measures," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 52(4), pages 753-785, April.
    6. Shi, Yongbin & Yu, Miao & Chen, Liujun & Ivanov, Plamen Ch. & Wang, Yougui, 2021. "Quantifying financial market dynamics: Scaling law in rank mobility of Chinese stock prices," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    7. Dinko Dimitrov & Emiliya A. Lazarova & Shao-Chin Sung, 2016. "Inducing stability in hedonic games," University of East Anglia School of Economics Working Paper Series 2016-09, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..

  5. Can, Burak & Ozkes, Ali Ihsan & Storcken, Ton, 2015. "Measuring polarization in preferences," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 76-79.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  6. Can, Burak, 2014. "Weighted distances between preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 109-115.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  7. Burak Can & Bettina Klaus, 2013. "Consistency and population sensitivity properties in marriage and roommate markets," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 41(4), pages 835-862, October.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  8. Can, Burak & Storcken, Ton, 2013. "Update monotone preference rules," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 136-149.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  9. Can, Burak & Storcken, Ton, 2012. "Impossibilities with Kemeny updating," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 229-231.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  10. Can, Burak & Sanver, M. Remzi, 2009. "Stereotype formation as trait aggregation," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 226-237, September.

    Cited by:

    1. Denis Bouyssou & M. Remzi Sanver, 2022. "Simple but Powerful Models of Stereotype Formation," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 73(6), pages 1055-1068.

  11. Burak Can & Bora Erdamar & M. Sanver, 2009. "Expected Utility Consistent Extensions of Preferences," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 67(2), pages 123-144, August.

    Cited by:

    1. Núñez, Matías & Laslier, Jean-François, 2015. "Bargaining through Approval," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 63-73.
    2. Ulle Endriss, 2013. "Sincerity and manipulation under approval voting," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 335-355, March.
    3. Bora Erdamar & M. Sanver, 2009. "Choosers as extension axioms," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 67(4), pages 375-384, October.

Chapters

  1. Burak Can, 2015. "Distance Rationalizability of Scoring Rules," Studies in Choice and Welfare, in: Constanze Binder & Giulio Codognato & Miriam Teschl & Yongsheng Xu (ed.), Individual and Collective Choice and Social Welfare, edition 127, pages 171-178, Springer.
    See citations under working paper version above.Sorry, no citations of chapters recorded.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 15 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-CDM: Collective Decision-Making (4) 2013-06-16 2014-02-02 2014-06-14 2017-04-09
  2. NEP-DES: Economic Design (4) 2017-06-18 2017-09-24 2020-08-24 2020-09-21
  3. NEP-GTH: Game Theory (4) 2010-10-16 2017-04-09 2017-06-11 2021-07-26
  4. NEP-MIC: Microeconomics (4) 2017-04-09 2017-06-11 2017-09-24 2017-10-22
  5. NEP-POL: Positive Political Economics (4) 2013-06-16 2013-12-15 2014-06-14 2017-09-24
  6. NEP-UPT: Utility Models and Prospect Theory (3) 2014-06-14 2017-10-22 2018-01-15
  7. NEP-CMP: Computational Economics (2) 2013-12-15 2015-12-01
  8. NEP-PAY: Payment Systems and Financial Technology (2) 2020-08-24 2021-07-26
  9. NEP-CTA: Contract Theory and Applications (1) 2017-10-22
  10. NEP-CWA: Central and Western Asia (1) 2021-07-26

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Burak Can should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.