In Pressbooks, the way H5P activities are integrated makes the activity name less critical for students, as they don’t see it (although it might improve the user experience if they DID see the activity names - as noted in some other usability-related tasks).

Naming is more about helping instructors organize their content. However, it’s still important to clearly indicate to students what they need to complete. Developing a consistent naming process takes time and may require adjustments as content evolves, but there’s currently no recommended approach for naming.

This task is to provide prescriptive "best practices" type guidance in documentation about how to approach naming so that it works well for organizing content AND it works well for using and interpreting learning data and scores captured via Pressbooks Results.

Best practices-type materials probably already exist and may be in use by clients - whether developed by H5P or by instructional designers supporting faculty creators. We should investigate what already exists, especially anything openly-licensed, and consider how to adapt this work to fit the Pressbooks Results context.