[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Contents of Table View is not consistent #24

Open
fletchwsf opened this issue Aug 26, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

Contents of Table View is not consistent #24

fletchwsf opened this issue Aug 26, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@fletchwsf
Copy link
Contributor

The contents of the table view within an emfta model is not consistent. As shown in the screen shots below, the name and description column have repeated entries even though separate names and descriptions have been entered for each node. Also, click to select a row, as seen in the second screen shot and the table content changes slightly.

Mars version of emfta
EMFTA 1.0.0.201508201543 edu.cmu.emfta.feature.feature.group SEI/CMU

The emfta model is available at
https://github.com/fletchwsf/emfta_examples/blob/RefineExamples/UseIntermediate.emfta

image

image
@juli1
Copy link
Owner
juli1 commented Aug 30, 2015

This sounds to be a UI issue related to Eclipse or linux libraries. If you click on a line, you then have the correct info in the property view. I asked the Sirius community on the support forum.

https://www.eclipse.org/forums/index.php/m/1706768/#msg_1706768

@mPorhel
Copy link
mPorhel commented Aug 31, 2015

Hi,

See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=476219
On Mac OS X, I get the expected table rendering

@juli1
Copy link
Owner
juli1 commented Aug 31, 2015

I suspect this is a gtk/linux related issue - I suspect everything is working ok on Windows and Mac OS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@juli1 @mPorhel @fletchwsf