[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Problems with interpretation of training results #61

Open
MakkaPakka-sc opened this issue Mar 4, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Problems with interpretation of training results #61

MakkaPakka-sc opened this issue Mar 4, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@MakkaPakka-sc
Copy link

Snipaste_2024-03-04_15-34-44
Thank you very much for your research content. I changed the teacher model to GFNet, and the student model used MobileNet V2. I got this result. What is the reason for the mutation when the step is 300? In addition, which indicator represents the test acc of the student model and which represents the acc of the teacher model. Is the calculation of FLOPs integrated in the framework?
@MakkaPakka-sc
Copy link
Author
MakkaPakka-sc commented Mar 4, 2024 •
edited
Loading

@Zzzzz1 Can you answer my question? Thank you very much

@Zzzzz1
Copy link
Collaborator
Zzzzz1 commented Mar 4, 2024
  1. The reason is that the learning rate changes. 2.test_acc represents the acc of the student, the teacher's acc is not plotted. 3. not integrated.

@MakkaPakka-sc
Copy link
Author

Thank you for your answer. What may be the reason for the unchanged acc on the later test set?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Zzzzz1 @MakkaPakka-sc