Paper 2021/958
When the Decoder Has to Look Twice: Glitching a PUF Error Correction
Abstract
Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) have been increasingly used as an alternative to non-volatile memory for the storage of cryptographic secrets. Research on side channel and fault attacks with the goal of extracting these secrets has begun to gain interest but no fault injection attack targeting the necessary error correction within a PUF device has been shown so far. This work demonstrates one such attack on a hardware fuzzy commitment scheme implementation and thus shows a new potential attack threat existing in current PUF key storage systems. After presenting evidence for the overall viability of the profiled attack by performing it on an FPGA implementation, countermeasures are analysed: we discuss the efficacy of hashing helper data with the PUF-derived key to prevent the attack as well as codeword masking, a countermeasure effective against a side channel attack. The analysis shows the limits of these approaches. First, we demonstrate the criticality of timing in codeword masking by confirming the attack's effectiveness on ostensibly protected hardware. Second, our work shows a successful attack without helper data manipulation and thus the potential for sidestepping helper data hashing countermeasures.
Metadata
- Available format(s)
-
PDF
- Category
- Attacks and cryptanalysis
- Publication info
- Published by the IACR in TCHES 2022
- Keywords
- physical unclonable function fuzzy commitment scheme fault attack safe error attack clock glitch masking
- Contact author(s)
-
j ruchti @ tum de
m pehl @ tum de - History
- 2022-06-13: last of 3 revisions
- 2021-07-22: received
- See all versions
- Short URL
- https://ia.cr/2021/958
- License
-
CC BY
BibTeX
@misc{cryptoeprint:2021/958,
author = {Jonas Ruchti and Michael Gruber and Michael Pehl},
title = {When the Decoder Has to Look Twice: Glitching a {PUF} Error Correction},
howpublished = {Cryptology {ePrint} Archive, Paper 2021/958},
year = {2021},
url = {https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/958}
}