Mattinbgn

 

Thanks VS. Arman, No-one disagreed with you that the article could be improved; most articles can. My point is, and I stand by it, is that any faults with the article could have be dealt with outside the FAR process, given that there was zero chance that the article would be delisted. Your nomination was vindictive in nature and designed to act as a deterrent to other editors who comment in FACs and FARs that you have an interest in. Raising the problem of your abuse of process at the FAR was entirely appropriate and transparent. Your comments above deepen my concern with your actions and attitude; wiki-lawyering and forum-shopping are generally frowned upon. I have no interest in taking further action in this matter, my opinion of your nomination has been made clear. Regards, 11:14, 30 May 2008 (UTC)