Content deleted Content added
DRosenbach (talk | contribs) crown and bridge is a staple of dentistry |
|||
Line 61:
:The article prior to me getting to it was a sad, sad exhibit of mish-mosh categorization and information, thus leading the reader to total confusion. Facts were laid out almost incomprehensibly and items were listed as though only a moment's thought were put into them being there. To argue that I am messing up categories that you liked is futile, as the article was barely an article, in my opinion. If you have an opinion, this is not my article, so let's discuss it and find a concensus on how to present this information. But to claim that I am tinkering with things and erroneously reorganizing...I assert that reorganizing when there was little to no organization is actually organizing. '''[[User:DRosenbach|DRosenbach]]''' <sup>([[User_talk:DRosenbach|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/DRosenbach|Contribs]])</sup> 21:47, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
::See my post above - Ante's Rule is no longer necessary in case selection - Ong et al proved that 11% (if I remember correctly) remaining periodontal support on two abutment teeth was enough to support a bridge. Many people still use it as a guide (such as myself). A more important rule is the Law of Spans. [[User:Dr-G|Dr-G - Illigetimi non carborundum est.]] 16:23, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
| |||