| Toolbox |
|---|
| This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I'm currently trying to get it to GA status. It's been nominated, but hasn't been touched in almost 2 weeks and will likely take a long time, so I'd like to use this time to get it as ready as possible.
The areas I think that need review are the writing style and maintaining a neutral point of view.
Thanks, NicklausAU (talk) 12:42, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- You can't do this per Step 4 of the PR instructions. This is, however, probably the result of me being just a little too ambiguous by saying "nominating the article for review" - I apologize for that. What I meant was when the review came, well obviously, you'd get that without even asking for it. That's what GA reviews are, after all, right?
Sorry to have caused trouble. dannymusiceditor oops 04:25, 10 June 2018 (UTC)