Content deleted Content added
→Actus reus: remove self-link |
|||
Line 5:
===Actus reus===
The offences of
"Encouraging" is not defined in the statute and can be considered in the same way as the previous crime of incitement. It does not matter if the encouragement or assistance has no effect.<ref>Simester et al. (2010). p. 288.</ref> In ''[[Invicta Plastics Ltd v Clare]]'',<ref>[1976] RTR 251 (DC)</ref> a company sold a device to detect [[Radar gun|radar traps]] used by the police; using such a device is illegal. The case also confirmed that there is no need for the incitement to be aimed at a specific person - addressing it to the world at large still constitutes incitement.<ref name=her793>Herring (2008). p. 793.</ref> It was advertised illustrating its use in an illegal fashion.<ref name="sim289">Simester et al. (2010) p. 289.</ref> However, in ''R v. James''<ref>(1985) 82 Crim LR 897 (CA)</ref> the selling of "black boxes" solely capable of illegally tapping mains electricity sources was not found to incite a crime.<ref name="sim289"/> In ''R v. Marlow''<ref>[1997] Crim LR 897 (CA)</ref> providing information on the growing of cannabis was found to constitute an offence.<ref name="sim289">Simester et al. (2010). p. 289.</ref> "Assisting" is likely to be considered similar to "aiding" in [[Accessory (legal term)|accessorial liability]]. Assistance can be provided indirectly, for example through a third person.<ref>Simester et al. (2010). p. 290.</ref>
|