Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 November 24
November 24
edit- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:16, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- File:Saddam Hussein.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- We don't have enough source, author, and date information to determine the copyright status of this image. Diannaa (talk) 01:36, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This link demonstrates that it was published at least prior to Sept. 3, 2003. Whether this helps or not, I don't know... Ravendrop 21:56, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note that
{{PD-Iraq}}
on Wikipedia conflicts with{{DP-Iraq}}
on Commons. Also, we are missing evidence that Iraq is the source country. As Iraq is not a signatory to the Berne Convention, Iraq can only be the source country if all of the following are true:
- The picture was first published in Iraq, and not published in any other country within 30 days,
- The photographer was a resident of Iraq, and
- The photographer was a citizen of Iraq.
- Currently, we do not have any evidence of any of those. Journalists from all around the world typically take pictures of political leaders and publish them in newspapers and other publications in their home countries. Therefore, without further information, it is impossible to identify the source country of the picture. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:09, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- URL cited as claim for license does not actually release the image to public domain and, in fact, has a copyright claim with all rights reserved. Eeekster (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep. Image is correctly listed as non-free. TLSuda (talk) 16:32, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- improper license Mulamoottil Adima (talk) 18:08, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:14, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.