 | This is an essay on notability. It contains the advice and/or opinions of one or more WikiProjects on how notability may be interpreted within their area of interest. This information is not a formal Wikipedia policy or guideline, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. |
For people who meet one of the following criteria, it is typically very likely that substantial secondary sources exist. However, if an extensive search reveals no coverage in reliable sources, this may indicate that the person in question does not meet the notability criteria.
- Any Biography
- The person has received significant recognized awards or honours.
- The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field.1
- Politicians:
- Politicians who have held international, national or statewide/provincewide office, and members and former members of a national, state or provincial legislature.2
- Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage.1
- Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such a person may be notable for other reasons besides their political careers alone.
- Diplomats:
- Diplomats who have participated in a significant way in events of particular diplomatic importance that have been written about in reliable secondary sources.
- Simply being an ambassador does not guarantee notability, although such a person may be notable for other reasons aside from his/her diplomatic career.
- Diplomats often participate in issues of significant diplomatic importance without receiving specific individual coverage. This does not necessarily mean that such participation doesn't confer notability.
- Athletes:
- Competitors and coaches who have competed in a fully professional league, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport such as swimming, golf or tennis.
- Competitors and coaches who have competed at the highest level in amateur sports (who meet the general criteria of secondary sources published about them).3
- Entertainers: actors, comedians, opinion makers, models, and television personalities:
- With significant roles in notable films, television, stage performances, and other productions.
- Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following.
- Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment.
- See WP:MUSIC for guidelines on musicians, composers, groups, etc.
- Creative professionals: scientists, academics, economists, professors, authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, engineers, and other creative professionals.
- The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by their peers or successors.
- The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique.
- The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, which has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.
- The person's work either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries, museums or internationally significant libraries.
- See Wikipedia:Notability (academics) for guidelines on academics
Non-valid general criteria
edit- While a relationship with a well-known person is not a justification for a standalone article, as per WP:NOTINHERITED, it is not a bar to the less notable relative having their own standalone article, if they too measure up to inclusion standards, like WP:GNG as, for instance, the standalone articles listed at Succession_to_the_British_throne#Current_line_of_succession. Individuals related to someone more notable than they are, who do not meet our inclusion standards may merits some coverage in the article of their better known relative.
- Avoid criteria based on search engine statistics (e.g., Google hits or Alexa ranking), or measuring the number of photos published online. The adult film industry, for example, uses Googlebombing to influence rankings. See also limitations of Alexa.
Notes
edit- ^Note 1 : Generally, a person who is "part of the enduring historical record" will have been written about, in depth, independently in multiple history books on that field, by historians. A politician who has received "significant press coverage" has been written about, in depth, independently in multiple news feature articles, by journalists. An actor who has been featured in magazines has been written about, in depth, independently in multiple magazine feature articles, by magazine article writers. An actor or TV personality who has "an independent biography" has been written about, in depth, in a book, by an independent biographer.
- ^Note 2 : This is a secondary criterion. People who satisfy this criterion will almost always satisfy the primary criterion. Biographers and historians will usually have already written about the past and present holders of major political offices. However, this criterion ensures that our coverage of major political offices, incorporating all of the present and past holders of that office, will be complete regardless.
- ^Note 3 : Participation in and in most cases winning individual tournaments, except the most prestigious events, does not make non-athletic competitors notable. This includes, but is not limited to, poker, bridge, chess, Magic: The Gathering, Starcraft, etc.