Willbown

Hi. When you recently edited South England flood of February 1287, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broomhill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 28 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi! Per my comment on Talk:Big bang, I am answering the question here.

I'll first need to ask you to clarify the question - there are a lot of possibilities between "nothing to say" and "tells us how," i.e. your two positions are opposite extremes on a scale, rather than there being a "distinction." I would agree that as we go back in time we generally know less. I am not sure that there's any time where it would be accurate to say we know "nothing" - for example, we can be quite confident that at no point at or after t=0 did the universe look like what it does today (galaxies, stars, humans...) The exact moment of t=0 (the "origin," under some meanings of the word) is a special case, but I don't think it's completely clear that it is meaningful to even use the term "exact moment" as that may have been the beginning of time itself. I look forward to your response - although keep in mind that while I have a decent knowledge of physics I am not a physicist myself, so if you want a detailed discussion I recommend asking elsewhere, such as WikiProject Physics. Arc de Ciel (talk) 05:50, 25 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Scholarly thesauri requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. JMHamo (talk) 14:57, 15 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Evie magazine, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:36, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Draft:Evie magazine, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/daisy-clementine-wants-you-to-meet-evie. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
  If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Singularity42 (talk) 16:07, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Willbown. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Artificial agent, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Willbown. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Artificial agent".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:25, 20 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Binary classification, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Administration. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:53, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Evaluation of binary classifiers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Skew.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:25, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply