NikauTokelau

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to N.F.-Board may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *{{fb|Gozo}}†*<ref>[http://gozonews.com/13597/the-fourth-edition-of-the-viva-world-cup-kicks-off-in-gozo/}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:23, 11 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

== Proposed deletion of ConIFA World Football Cup ==

 

The article ConIFA World Football Cup has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability, fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 19:50, 23 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ConIFA World Football Cup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ConIFA World Football Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GiantSnowman 12:50, 24 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks and sorry for the deletion of the tag. The tag itself said something that I can remove it if it I improve the article, which I did by using refs. What is the reason for deletion ? Is it the style of the article or the content of it ? NikauTokelau (talk) 13:56, 24 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Something being well referenced does not make it notable. Something being covered in some media does not make it notable. GiantSnowman 18:26, 24 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

The guidelines say "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list." Which part of that is not satisfied in your opinion? It has received significant coverage (Swedish/Norwegian national TV, Swedish national radio, Iraqi newspaper, Canadian newspaper, German magazines, UK magazines). Sources like national TV/radion, 11Freunde from Germany and the biggest Canadian French newspaper are surely reliable and independent of the subject. So which is the argument for not-notability ? NikauTokelau (talk) 18:33, 24 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, NikauTokelau. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to N.F.-Board may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *{{fb|Two Sicilies}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:26, 27 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

UNPO Cup, I'll let you finish. There is a French version Spanish and Italian. I do not have an account then I'll let you use it. In NON-FIFA you'll find. Cordially.

The UNPO Cup 2005 is a football competition organized by the NF-Board and the Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization for nations not recognized by FIFA or by the United Nations, held in the Netherlands in the city of the Hague on 23 June 2005 and which saw the team of the Republic of the South Moluccas win the tournament.^[1]

The UNPO Cup^[2] experienced only edition.^[3]

At the seventh General Assembly of the Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization, which brings together 61 members from 24 to 26 June 2005, the federation organizes a football tournament.^[4] The South Moluccas won the cup, beating Chechnya in the final.^[5]

•   South Moluccas
•   Chechnya
•   West Papua^[6] · ^[7]
•   Southern Cameroons

• ELF Cup
• FIFI Wild Cup
• Viva World Cup
• ConIFA World Football Cup
• KTFF 50th Anniversary Cup
• Non-FIFA international football

Category:UNPO Cup Category:Non-FIFA football competitions Category:2005 in Netherlands football

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a01:e34:ee0e:abd0:b854:9c74:3c1f:e26d (talk) 00:08, 6 November 2016 (UTC)Reply