Monedula

Hey Monedula, I noticed that you just wrote an article about the Javanese language on the Russian Wikipedia. Could you perhaps take a look at this jv:Kaca Utama -> jv:Template:Aboutthispage and translate the Russian section? Thanks! Meursault2004 17:06, 19 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Done. Btw, what is the difference between "Basa Jawa" and "Basa Jawi"? — Monedula 18:53, 19 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

I've seen it, thank you. Well in Javanese there are different styles. These are socially connected. "Basa Jawa" is Javanese in low Javanese or in common style while "Basa Jawi" is Javanese in high Javanese or in the polite style. This difference in styles is also found in other East Asian languages such as Japanese, Korean, and Thai. Meursault2004 19:31, 19 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Did you just make this up, or does it have a homepage somewhere? I'm interested in it, but there are certain problems with it and I want to know if it's ok to just start changing it or if there's a process --Random|832 23:35, 13 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

There is no homepage. Feel free to edit it. — Monedula 08:07, 17 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

I ask for deletion (Deletion request) to Image:Moth-003.jpg See [[1]] --Gyllenhali 14:25, 3 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Hello I started an article timeline of Motorized bicycle history. I though you might be interested. --Pat 16:53, 3 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Take a look. It seems there that the raging russophobia of some is the only reason of the attempts to derail the candidacy of one of the most worthy people for the job. His unquestionably high ethics and decensy are so clear even from how he handles the criticism and shameless attacks at his own RfAdm even for those who don't know him from his contributions to Wikipedia! --Irpen 19:28, 10 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

I must thank you for erase my work! Ludor | ÿ 22:24, 14 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

 

Hi, thanks for your voting on my RFA. It has finished with the result 88/14/9, and I am promoted. I am really overwhelmed with the amount of support I have got. With some of you we have edited many articles as a team, with some I had bitter arguments in the past, some of you I consider to be living legends of Wikipedia and some nicks I in my ignorance never heard before. I love you all and I am really grateful to you.

If you feel I can help you or Wikipedia as a human, as an editor or with my newly acquired cleaning tools, then just ask and I will be happy to assist. If you will feel that I do not live up to your expectation and renegade on my promises, please contact me. Maybe it was not a malice but just ignorance or a short temper. Thank you very much, once more! abakharev 07:34, 24 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'm wondering if you think that it might be better to change the shape of ё entirely to something more "visually pleasing" and harder to not write than to completely remove it from writing. I'm thinking that, since Ё is iotified, the bar used for Ю could be used, like in E iotified, except with the normal E replacing the Є. The lower cased version could be written with the lower cased e, written in only two strokes. Or one if you don't want to pick your pen off the paper. In cursive, I'm thinking that it would be the easiest to write it exactly like E iotified, but the lower cased could be written as printed. Not that the upper cased one would have to be written very often.

I think that this kind of ё would be easy to write and read, but hard to not write, unlike ё. It'd probably have to be put somewhere decent on the keyboard too, though. And it would be much better to keep some form of ё than not write it completely (which, according to your Russian user page, you like). Has anybody else thought of this? What do you think? BirdValiant 02:20, 14 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

In fact, today both Е and Ё are iotified letters (they are pronounced as [je] and [jo], respectively). Besides, in Russian writing Е and Є are just variants of the same letter. So the form IE that you propose have no clear meaning. — Monedula 12:10, 14 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yes, making that form would re-iotify an already iotified letter (in writing only...in speech it would cause an error in the natural order of the universe, causing it to collapse into a singularity, ending all life as we know it...), but it would eliminate the inconsistancy with the iotification (is that even a word?) of vowels. It would be impossible to make an iotified version of O using by attaching an I, as that would yield Ю, which is already taken by У. Since Е and Ё are switched around in grammar so often, it makes sense to have them look similar, but it does not make sense to attach an I to the E because E is the iotified version of Э. This is probably why Ё was formed, as it marked the difference between the two versions, while keeping Ё similar to Е. However, as it marks some iotification (again), even if it is not of E, I thought that it would be better to mark this iotation by using the usual form and attaching an I to the original letter, which could be changed from О to Е to mark the similarity between Ё and Е. It would eliminate the inconsistancy caused by adding the umlaut, but would add one by re-iotifying E. However, this inconsistancy might be harder to ignore invite more people to actually write the letter. Which is the whole reason why I wasted your and my time by writing this. BirdValiant 01:10, 15 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Maybe a different version of Ё, with the same principles for changing as above, could be like E and e, except with the tail used in Щ and Ц. In this case, it would mark the iotation in the same way as Щ is the iotified (basically) form of Ш. But it would'nt have anything to do with Ц. Maybe it would be easier to write this form. Plus, it would add another descender to the alphabet, as removing Ё would remove an ascender. But maybe we need another ascender. I don't know how E could be changed to have an ascender though. Maybe the I part of the IE could be written as an ascender. But then Ю would have to do the same. Then that's be too many changes to the alphabet. But anyway, the whole purpose here is to make the written form of Russian easier to read. BirdValiant 01:38, 15 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Приветсвую Вас, Я только что обнаружил Ваш вопрос:

Chaliapin was born in Ömet Tawı, Kazan.  What is Ömet Tawı? Is it a part of Kazan? — Monedula 08:42, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This what I've got:

Fedor Chalyapin was born on February 1 (OS) 1873 in Kazan, in the wing of merchant Lisitzin's house on the Rybnoryadskoaya Street, now Pushkin Street, 10 [sometimes named 14] (in the Soviet time it was Kuibyshev street, 14). This wing doesn’t exist now, but the house with the yard where the wing was situated is still there. On the next day, Candlemas Day, Fedor was baptized in Bogoyavlenkaya church in former Large Prolomnaya street (nowadays Bauman street). His God parents were the neighbours: the shoemaker Nikolay Tonkov and 12-year-old girl Ludmilochka Kharitonova.

The dwelling was expensive for Ivan Yakovlevich, served as a clerk in the Zemskaya Uprava (Land Council), and in 1878 the Chalyapin family moved to the village Ahmetyevo (also Ometyevo, or the Ometyev settlements, now the district of Kazan near Tikhomirnov street) behind the place named Sukonnaya Sloboda, and settled in a small house.

I try to incorporate this into the article, but please, correct my English.

External links

• Tatar Museums (in English)
• Chalyapin and Kazan (in Russian)
• Kazan: Kultura (in Russian)

(Meladina 15:54, 28 May 2006 (UTC))Reply

The page http://www.anybrowser.org/campaign/abgraphics.html says: The creators of the graphics below have given permission for you to use any of the below graphics to show that your site is participating in the campaign for a non-browser-specific WWW. — Monedula 08:51, 31 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Poshekhonye, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! Burntsauce 16:35, 29 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:UAZlogo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:40, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

A template you created, Template:Bigserif, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the {{deprecated}} tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention. --MZMcBride 04:44, 6 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Laziness, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 05:16, 25 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Template:Bigunicode has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Caerwine Caer’s whines 00:01, 2 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I have read your article called Belgorod, and I think, I found a mistake. "Peter the Great visited it on the eve of the Battle of Poltava, and a dragoon regiment was stationed in the town until 1917." That cannot be because Peter the Great died in 1725. Please correct it because I don't know the real data. Thank you: Ferike333 ✍V I T A —Preceding comment was added at 14:06, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi Monedula, I know that you wrote Likbez a while ago, but I was wondering if you can provide sources for the census information in that article. Please link the pages if they are online or reference the books otherwise. If you need help with how to format them just ask. If the sources are in Russian that is fine, even preferable since I'm learning Russian. I found some sources in English that I'm going to add, but haven't found the census info to verify it. Intriguing topic by the way. Regards, dvdrw 05:52, 16 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading Image:Roadsign-prohibitory.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:09, 30 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly ^hi! 01:09, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Template:Smallcaps has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 13:16, 20 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Template:Smallcaps has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 16:21, 2 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

I saw you suggested a merger, I totally agree with you, it seems that quite a number of users disagreed, BUT all of them assumed you suggested the merger of New Year's Day and New year's eve Ha ha, reminds me of this Ris? I don't get it? Moron's. Anyway I tried to clarify; Talk:New_Year's_Day#Merger_with_New_Year A few years too late by the looks of it, thought I should let you know anyway. --Pnb73 (talk) 00:25, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pigeon-in-flight-over-asphalt.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:07, 19 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Filosofy. Since you had some involvement with the Filosofy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Bridgeplayer (talk) 14:24, 29 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:UAZlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on File:ZiD-50-Pilot.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:02, 11 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Variator (variable valve timing) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:21, 8 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Lang has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:11, 26 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Extraterrestrial skies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extraterrestrial skies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Roodog2k (talk) 13:23, 3 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Volkov Commander is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volkov Commander until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Marslo2015 (talk) 21:54, 26 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Though. Since you had some involvement with the Though redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. DGG ( talk ) 04:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Although. Since you had some involvement with the Although redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 13:20, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Lang-zh has been nominated for merging with Template:Zh. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. -- Beland (talk) 06:38, 24 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

What Is The Purpose Of That Template? 愛耶穌 (talk) 01:33, 16 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

«The purpose of this template is to indicate that a span of text belongs to a particular language. It often makes no visible changes to the text, but can prompt web browsers to use a more appropriate font, or screen readers to use a particular kind of pronunciation, and so on.» — Monedula (talk) 05:28, 16 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Now I Know That This Template Is Important. Thanks! 愛耶穌 (talk) 16:33, 16 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Foto. Since you had some involvement with the Foto redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.

I have asked for it to be retargeted to Fotö for reasons explained at the nomination. Mjroots (talk) 09:49, 29 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Megametre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Simply a measurement guide, filled with original research

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr. Anon515 01:21, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Gigametre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only sources are dictionary definitions and a paper that does not use this unit

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr. Anon515 01:26, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dumpster® diving. Since you had some involvement with the Dumpster® diving redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 03:22, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Toontown is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toontown until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sjö (talk) 05:11, 23 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2002 Vitim event is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2002 Vitim event until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hemiauchenia (talk) 19:29, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply