Jumbling

Please click here to leave me a new message.

I generally like to keep conversations intact, so please watch this page if you leave a comment.

Archives
February 8 2006 – April 14 2006 April 10 2006 – May 8 2006 May 8 2006 – November 1 2006

boo hoo im gutted —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Steeley001 (talk • contribs) 17:59, November 30, 2006.

Thanks! :-D FreplySpang 16:00, 1 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

In case you don't have it watched, I replied on my talk page. editor review me!-TeckWiz^TalkContribs_{# of Edits} 15:19, 3 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Happy Birthday, Jumbling, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

A birthday message for you on behalf of the Birthday Committee. --Extranet ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 01:26, 16 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Happy Belated B-day, Condem, from the Birthday Committee!!--Too Boy Crazy 22:50, 21 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

www.aerobatics.org.uk ....... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Uva.ceo (talk • contribs) 19:21, January 23, 2007.

Hey I thought your comment was funny. :-) So I hereby present you with this:

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		I award you this barnstar for a laugh. Regards, Húsönd 05:40, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cheers, Húsönd 05:40, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

	HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY!	from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE
	Wishing Jumbling a very Happy First Edit Day! Have a fantastic day! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee

--Extranet ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 10:23, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I've come across you at RC patrolling. I see you've done lots of vandal fighting and other useful things. Have you ever considered running for an adminship? If you want, I can nominate you. Regards, --Tone 14:03, 12 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Deal. Just tell me when you fell you're ready, I'll be glad to nominate you. Regards, --Tone 14:08, 12 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

You need to warn users more than once before leaving them the final warning, especially when there have been no warning on their talk pages. Reporting them for vandalism after leaving a single warning on their talk page is considered newbie biting. I have reverted you on the Admin intervention against vandalism page. Please take note. Regards, — Nearly Headless Nick 15:02, 12 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about that, I just saw that he'd been given an "only warning", and so reported him when he vandalised again. Otherwise, what's the point of the "only warning" at all? In general, I don't even like the "only warning" (although I have used it once), and am always fair with vandals. But since it was clearly vandalism (diff), and not an honest mistake in any way, I don't really think it's biting the newbie. ConDem^Talk 16:35, 12 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yes, clearly vandalism. But, only vandalism. He was not trolling, neither was he vandalising userspace. We should be more tolerant than that with the vandals. It gets us new editors. I have this page on my watchlist, please respond here, if you wish to. Regards, — Nearly Headless Nick 14:08, 13 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I do think in this case that i was a little trigger-happy with reporting this vandal. But while I accept the decision of an admin not to block a reported vandal (in this case, becuase there were too few warnings) I don't think that simply reporting them to admins is newbie-biting. Blocking a vandal early might be newbie-biting - but simply to report a vandal is to say "Hey, check this guy out, in my opinion he ought to be blocked". And that's not newbie-biting, it's bringing a vandal to the attention of admins. And bear in mind that in this case it wasn't actually my "only warning" anyway, and that I always give fair warning (well, apart from in this case) before reporting. (Eg User talk:68.199.211.132). I understand your concerns, though, and will continue to give adequate warning. ConDem^Talk 01:42, 14 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

It happens a lot. Especially with the lag time in wikipedia right now. --Kukini 17:34, 12 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yea, that one must of slipped by. I've been trying to warn multiple vandals at once, that probably had something to do with it, thanks for the heads up, appreciate it. I'll be more careful from now on. Bmg916 02:26, 14 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Haha, it did have many sub-clauses but I definitely see where you're coming from, and I definitely agree. When people warn after my reverts I get really confused, and sometimes like I'm in a race to warn, lol. Bmg916 02:33, 14 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I put the cats in alphabetical order just because it's easier to see at a glance if a certain category is already in place, particularly when the list gets longer. I took out the "Mika" after the pipe because, as I understand it, that is just for sorting into the right order on the category page. As the title of the page is Mika (singer), the article will alrady come under "M" on category pages. It's only necessary to sort then when, for example, you have a first name and a surname. Then you can add "|Surname, First name" which will then put the article under the relevant letter on the category page for the surname. I hope that makes sense. Like I said, that's as far as I understand it, I could be wrong... Belovedfreak 18:40, 15 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Random ought to redirect to Randomness, but for some reason it redirects to Random (disambiguation). What's going on? ConDem^Talk 20:39, 16 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Looks like you got it right -- redirs to randomness when I look at it. Probably you ran into a cache issue, whether with the server or your browser. Editing redirects gets really tricky. :p – Luna Santin (talk) 20:44, 16 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, it's working now, thought it might be a cache problem, but thought I'd ask anyway. Thanks! ConDem^Talk 20:47, 16 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

hi i edited the article loughmore as i happen to know the area. i'll give you any information on loughmoe castle i can —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rigger30 (talk • contribs) 21:32, February 18, 2007 (UTC)

Hi again I'm relatively new to this but thank's for the advice. I'll see what information i can dig out. Sorry for not signing last message Rigger30 21:40, 18 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank's for the tips and the help! Rigger30 12:18, 19 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

who fucken cares if u fucken block me Come on block me from editing!!!! I DARE YOU —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.194.50.80 (talk) 09:25, 19 February 2007 (UTC).Reply

Well, I can't block you, but an admin will be along in a minute, I'm sure. Patience is a virtue. ConDem^Talk 09:30, 19 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Always best to reassure the vandals their block is coming ;-). Thanks for the revert of my userpage...the hangermanbot advice was priceless. auburnpilot talk 09:41, 19 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

No problem. Love the block notice header. ConDem^Talk 09:46, 19 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hey. I'm just dropping you a message to thank you for the quick requested move action and for leaving me a note. I did not jump in the discussion, as I thought maybe I, as a Finn, had overestimed how well "Mika" is known as a name outside Finland and Japan, so I wanted to see other editors' thoughts first. Thanks, Prolog 22:12, 21 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

• No worries. To be honest, I'm not absolutely sure about the move any more, mainly because of the Austrian band mentioned. The thing is, although there are many people called Mika, Mika (singer) is the only one known only as "Mika", rather than as Mika Something. It looks like it won't be moved now anyway, looking at the number of oppose votes! ConDem^Talk 22:16, 21 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

[1] I think you meant "keep"? --Maxamegalon2000 02:27, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Oops. Heh, that was dumb. Changed. ConDem^Talk 02:33, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I saw your AfD on the Rikers, and would appreciate your vote on the following articles, which are also about reality tv non-entities.

Leonid the Magnificent , Rappin' Granny, Tyler MacNiven,Sarah Reinertsen,Ron Young,Kandice Pelletier, Alison Irwin,Fred Holliday,Kendra Bentley, Tyler Denk & James Branaman. All the best & thanks --MacRusgail 03:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've voted on some of these, but i take each case on its merits, and so have voted keep for many of them. Please see AfD Etiquette about canvassing for votes. ConDem^Talk 04:55, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

hey man

i was trying to make aware that someone had put something there about prostitutes when btw wasn't me bro. So thats y i wrote something so u guyz would realise :P —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 220.236.192.154 (talk • contribs) 07:20, February 22, 2007 (UTC)

A record of the edit that you made vandalizing the article can be found here: diff. As you have been warned on your talk page, if you continue to vandalize articles, you will be blocked. ConDem^Talk 16:48, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

no change or revision by this user. I have a dynamic ip address, not a static one, could this have been done by others? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.57.150.200 (talk • contribs) 23:21, February 22, 2007 (UTC)

Possibly, I don't know. If you didn't make the edit, feel free to ignore the warning. ConDem^Talk 02:15, 23 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

The past 24 hours have not been my best on Wikipedia, and the cookie was most thoughtful and appreciated. It didn't taste too bad, either. Thanks again for both noticing and passing on your comments. Alansohn 17:21, 23 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

To be perfectly honest I'm getting so disillusioned by the lowest common intellectual denominator approach in wikipedia I'm just going to take the BSS page off my watchlist. Do what you want with it.ALR 18:15, 23 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I don't think it's dumbing down, it's just calling an encyclopedia article by the name most people will recognize. Please stick around and provide your opinion, so that all views can be represented... ConDem^Talk 18:19, 23 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Nope, you're right, I meant to use either WP:NAME or WP:COMMONNAME, both of which support the most common form of a name. My addled brain defaulted to WP:UE, which is sort of tangentially similar if you stretch it really hard. Actually, I've been at (and lurking about) a few move requests, like arguments over whether foreign words should be translated into "normal talk", whether foreign names should be allowed to use "funny squiggles", and whose variety of English is better. Meh. What are you going to do. Thanks for the point-out, tho'. --SigPig |^{SEND - OVER} 18:33, 23 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

My message and responses copied from User talk:BrownsFanForLife

Hi there, please read my note at Talk:Myachi. Please don't take offense, but the copyright violation problem is extremely important, and so the information had to be removed. Also, some of it was written like an advert, rather than an encyclopedia article. I know you claim to be the founder of Myachi, but unfortunately any advert-like material put up by the company or representative is likely to be thought of as spam, and spam edits will be reverted. Continual spamming might result in a block. Anyway, Myachi might well be notable enough to be on Wikipedia - but this musn't be an advert or a how-to guide, but an encyclopedia article. ConDem^Talk 03:30, 2 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

What are you on about? I'm not the founder of Myachi, I'm just a fan. I'm giving credit to the actual founder of Myachi, Steve Ochs. He's the one that had the idea, he started Myachi. Everything on that page, at one point or another, came from him and his ideas. I said, don't delete my page and waste me hours of work. I don't even know how long I spent on that page, but you keep screwing me over, even after I asked you not to. I said, TELL ME, BEFORE DELETING THE FRICKING PAGE, what sounds "non-encyclopedic" and I would then fix it

Thanks for listening.... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BrownsFanForLife (talk • contribs) 18:10, March 2, 2007 (UTC)

If you're so anal retentive about the Myachi page, why the heck don't you explain what I need to do, instead of shitting on me and deleting it every time? I'm new to wikipedia. I only signed up to fix up the Myachi page. I don't know what needs to be sourced and what doesn't, how/where to source something, or anything. You keep saying it sounds like an ad, but you never give an example. You just say something like "it." All of the information on it is from the same place, Steve Ochs. He founded Myachi, he wrote the history of it, pretty much. Some info may be from www.myachi.com, or from the flipbook that comes attached to each handsack, but it all stems from the same place - Steve Ochs and his company, Myachi Industries, Corp. There's no other source to mention except Ochs himself. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BrownsFanForLife (talk • contribs) 01:47, March 3, 2007 (UTC)

Hi BrownsFanForLife. I'm sorry that my edits made you feel this way. I didn't remove the content to be annoying, or becuase I didn't like it, but because it was a copyright violation, and so had to be removed as soon as possible. For more information on copyright, see WP:CP. This generally means that it came word for word from another source - for example, the flip book. If this is the case, it can't be put up on wikipedia, because this would be violating copyright laws. Also, if it comes from the myachi website, it can't be put straight up here either, for the same reason. Don't forget that nothing on the page has been completely deleted - it's all in the page history, so you can always go back to the content that you added.

When I said that the page sounded like an advert, it's because it was a bit like the information had been written like it was meant to sell me a product, rather than teach me about it like an encyclopedia should. Take a look at WP:TONE to find out more. In essence, though, the article must sound like an encyclopedia article, rather than a how-to guide or an advertisement.

Sourcing is extremely important on Wikipedia. If you look at articles that have been around for a long time, like united States, you'll see that much of the information has a note in the Notes section. Information in Myachi must be sourced in the same way. If it came from a website, like Myachi's own website, then it must be cited. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for more info.

I hope this is helpful. At no point was I "shitting on you", or being anal about the page - it's just that the information under copyright had to be removed, even before telling you about it. If you look at the article's talk page, you'll see that I did give an example of the conent that was unencyclopedic. Remeber that the page doesn't belong to anybody, not even you or me, and so you can't ask to be contacted before any changes are made.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page (in a civil manner). Again, I'm sorry about the way my edits made you feel, but please don't take offense. Content on wikipedia that breaks copyright laws - that is, stuff that's word-for-word from somewhere else - has to be removed immediately.

Also, remember to sign all your posts on talk pages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will produce your username, and the time of your post. Feel free to ask me any questions, ConDem^Talk 18:12, 3 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Okay, thanks... I did, as you said, state that much, if not all, of the information was from the Myachi website, although it isn't word-for-word. The main source is Ochs and/or Myachi and/or the website, but the only thing copied verbatim was the "Myachi in a Nutshell" section, for which I took info from the flipbook. Now does any of this info that wasn't copied word-for-word still need to be properly sourced and all, or should I just rewrite the page without any verbatim copies? BrownsFanForLife 00:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi again. Basically, all information should be properly sourced. Some of the information - like the "Myachi in a nutshell" - isn't really suitable for wikipedia, because it's more of a "how-to guide" than an encyclopedia, and so can be left out. The rest of the information should be properly sourced, like it says on Wikipedia:Citing sources. So basically, it can't be word-for-word copying, and must be sourced. Go ahead and add it in, and I'll try and help out by changing it to Wikipedia style. ConDem^Talk 01:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Okay, thanks... I'm just lost in the sauce as to how/where/what to source... What to write, where to write it, all of that. I had looked at an article or two about it but there's so much, it's hard to find what I need. BrownsFanForLife 02:23, 4 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

The easiest way to do it is probably with embedded citations, just adding the web address of the place you got the info in between square brackets after the piece of information. ConDem^Talk 02:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your support on my RfA. It passed with 55/0/0. I'll try my best to be worthy of the trust the community has put in me. If there are any of my actions you have a problem with or a question about, please feel free to discuss this with me and if needed to revert me. If there is anything else I can help you with (backlogs, comments, ...), you can always contact me on my talk page. Fram 15:01, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the University of Oxford. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! Casper Gutman 15:36, 24 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

The tabs at the top of each page have been replaced by additions to the side bar, above the Main page link. Any idea what's going on? ConDem^Talk 13:52, 3 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

You may have a weird skin on your account. Check your preferences to see if this is the case. If you need any more help, you can repost the {{helpme}} tag. I'll also be watching your page. --6_xB 14:57, 3 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I don't have a weird skin on my account, but the problem seems to have fixed itself. Thanks anyway. ConDem^Talk 17:23, 3 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

No problem. Happy editing! ;-) --6_xB 17:47, 3 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello there,

I am trying to add a page about Catherine Forde a children's author. It's not overt publicity just information about how she was discovered and what she writes about.

There are lots of informative pages about other authors such as Michael Morpurgo, Quentin Blake, Lemony Snicket etc and I hoped to create one for Catherine.

I added an article yesterday but it hasn't yet materialised. Can you advise how long it might take, it doesn't seem to have been deleted?

Thank you - all wisdom gratefully receieved.

Jessica

hi i was just wondering if you actually went to manwoods or dover grammar because I left manwood's last year and didn't really think we had a sporting rivalry with dgb at all. Hypnoticmonkey 19:17, 19 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Just a happy Birthday message to you, Condem, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

• FROM YOUR FRIEND:

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:43, 16 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

	Happy Birthday	from the Birthday Committee
	Wishing Jumbling a very happy birthday on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Don't forget to save us all a piece of cake!

--Nadir D Steinmetz 11:03, 16 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Just a happy Birthday message to you, Jumbling, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

Just a happy Birthday message to you, Jumbling, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

SailorAlphaCentauri (talk) 16:43, 16 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

u fag dont post stoopid shit like this again you stuck up snotty son of a bitch suck my dick u ho —Preceding unsigned comment added by Loco4240 (talk • contribs) 17:57, 16 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Thegravemed.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Happy First Edit Day, Condem', from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! User:ThinkBlue (talk) 06:03, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

• FROM YOUR FRIEND:

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:13, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Happy First Edit Day, Condem, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! User:Idontknow610 (talk) 06:03, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

--Nadir D Steinmetz 19:51, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Tu(big).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:49, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Condem...I am currently in the process of writing a user box for all of the colleges that are part of Oxbridge. This template is meant to replace your current college template. Please take a look at the work in progress and comment on it. My main concerns are college abbreviations and color choice. I am using scarf colors for the colleges. Thank you. - LA @ 17:21, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

proably would have been better if you'd photo'd the house some time other than when someone had just died. who was it anyway?Toyokuni3 (talk) 02:08, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:OneLondonEmblem.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 10:47, 3 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Happy Birthday, Jumbling, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

Versus22 _talk 17:47, 16 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

china should stop condemning the indian politcians.arunnachal pradesh is a part of india they dont hav right to climb it .if they continue to condem then it will end in danger —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.201.3.244 (talk) 14:21, 13 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello Condem! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Michael Hart (Oxford) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:04, 15 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hey, Jumbling. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!-- Vatsan34 (talk) 06:18, 16 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Happy Birthday, Jumbling, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a nice day! Logan Talk Contributions 21:05, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Happy First Edit Day, Jumbling, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Logan Talk Contributions 00:02, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

The article Reverb (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems to fail WP:NFILM. Tagged since April 2017.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:57, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi, if you are active on Wikipedia and are still interested in helping out with urgent tasks on our large Schools Project, please let us know here. We look forward to hearing from you.

---

Sent to project members 13:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC). You can opt of messages here.