Lorem ipsum5656

Hello, Burningblue52, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Grayfell (talk) 06:48, 25 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Ant-Man (film) page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 25 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Deadpool (film) page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 7 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Arrow_(TV_series)#New_subsection_for_Arrowverse Thought you might be interested in putting in your 2-cents worth, if not that's fine too. Thanks! LLArrow (talk) 03:56, 9 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Just wanted to say how amazeballs your 2-cents was on this issue; could not agree more. If you ever need anything from me, don't hesitate to ask. LLArrow (talk) 01:49, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Frank Oz, you may be blocked from editing. Diff: [3] Your claim that Frank Oz appears in The Force Awakens is not supported by the reference you included, which is about the film Inside Out. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:34, 21 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

I'm striking this warning because while you clearly introduced the wrong reference, there is an indication that Frank Oz's voice appears in The Force Awakens. You should seek consensus at Talk:Frank Oz for the inclusion of this information since it's questionable that we should be fabricating screen credits, and you should double-check your work in the future, please. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:39, 21 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

JJ Abrams has confirmed that it is Frank Oz.^[1]

He stated so here.

Which is what I wrote above. However there's still the matter of whether or not Oz should receive a credited role if he wasn't credited in the film, which I presume he was not. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:00, 21 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

I think with the director/writer giving credit to the actor -- they should have credit for their 'work'.

Credits are determined by the large scrolling list of names at the end of a film. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:12, 21 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

And yet, Ewen McGreger's cameo is listed? Usually cameos aren't listed in the end credits....

  Please refrain from uploading disruptive images against Wikipedia policies or consensus, such as Deadpool (2016 film) and Justin Bieber. It is considered vandalism. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 21:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

That's the official IMAX poster for the film.... ^[1]

• Right, and per the upload history at File:Deadpool poster.jpg, I believe Film Fan seems to think that adding it is controversial. A discussion to form consensus to add the poster you uploaded would best be started at Talk:Deadpool (film). Steel1943 (talk) 21:43, 24 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

You'll have to spread the word for me. I don't know how to do that really, very well.

Hello. This is just a notice that an RfC has been created for the discussion regarding alternate titles with Star Wars: The Force Awakens in which you participated in. If you would like to participate in the RfC, you can find it here. Thank you. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 00:00, 29 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Burningblue52: - Hi, I see in the discussion section of the RfC you mentioned that you support inclusion of "Star Wars Episode VII: The Force Awakens" in the lead. To that end, have you considered adding a "Support" !vote above? It would help build consensus. Cheers - ^theWOLFchild 00:56, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

The current organization of the games was arrived through talk page consensus based on sources that tied the games together in story arcs. If you feel the consensus should change, please use the article talk page and provide sources arguing for a different organization. The fact the games have "Warfare" in the name isn't enough to tie them together. -- ferret (talk) 22:11, 2 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Please sign posts, it makes communication a lot easier without forcing other editors to add unsigned for you. -- ferret (talk) 22:49, 2 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Universal Monsters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luke Evans. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

I am not trying to start a fight, I created this page over 4 years ago. I coined the phrase Universal Monsters Cinematic Universe before Universal used it. I am willing to share the page for the new universe. The Universal Monsters page is for all Universal Horror films from that era, ex Invisible Man and Creature from the Black Lagoon who are not part of that Universe.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 19 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

• You can't 'coin' a phrase which is now officially used by a studio to designate their project. That's not even 'legal' nor is it applicable. Their old films are called the 'Universal Monster Movies'. You cannot simply 'share' a page as they are two different entities and two separate series. Correct it or we'll just have have to get others involved in this 'editors disagreement'. P.S. sign your edits, and your posts.....also I can see that the page was 'created' not very long ago and then rapidly deleted as it was a duplicate.

Burningblue52 (talk) 06:30, 21 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Per WP:RS/CBM please refrain from using comicbookmovie.com as a reliable source. Comicbookmovie.com relies on user-submitted information, which makes it a self-published source and therefore unreliable. Instead please consider using the original source of the information, if the original source is reliable. Thank you.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:13, 3 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wouldn't it be a good argument to be able to site comicbookmovie.com, should the original source be listed for the sake of an interview? Not all articles on there are speculative nor opinion-based. Just saying. Burningblue52 (talk) 19:32, 3 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Things often get lost in translation or in this case transcription, so it is better to always use the original source. However if the interview is exclusive to comicbookmovie.com and is accompanied by audio or video of the interview then it may be appropriate to use.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:02, 3 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Is that what you wanted?  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 21:46, 27 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Yes! Thank you. I couldn't get the first album to go below the headings for whatever reason. Thanks for your help. Burningblue52 (talk)

What did you need help with? I looked at the article and it already has the poster in it.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 19:03, 22 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the help! It didn't have one this morning, I guess someone beat us to it. Burningblue52 (talk)

With all due respect, this is getting truly ridiculous. You've been on this site for over a year and you've received numerous warnings, yet you're still continuing to make disruptive edits ([4]). Please stop. DarkKnight2149 23:14, 22 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

• What disruptive edits do you claim I am making? I haven't added any false information, nor 'vandalized' any pages. Every contribution I make, I do in great care because I have an appreciation for this website and the facts. If you think that the DC Extended Universe edits I did were disruptive, then by what means? May I direct you to Marvel Cinematic Universe's similar chart, and the X-Men film series' crew chart as well. As you can see I used similar formatting and additional correct and valid information. This is all done in constructive purpose and not in any way intended to be 'truly ridiculous'^[1] as you put.

Thanks for your concern. But you are saying things in a hostile and confrontational sense. Burningblue52 (talk)

I was mainly referring to this. I know you're not a vandal and most of your edits seem to be in good faith, and this isn't intended to be an attack or a provocation (though, in retrospect, "this is getting" was a horrible choice of phrasing). This isn't even a user warning. But the reason I used the word "ridiculous" is because you've been making edits like this for a while and it seems like a lot of them end up being reverted by other editors. It would help if you tried to be more mindful of your edits. DarkKnight2149 15:57, 23 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Those edits were done in order to be similar to the other pages I linked in my response^ All edits I have done are meant to be constructive. Perhaps a second chart further down the page would be better. Other pages have charts that list the development crew. Just adding to the information is all.

Burningblue52 (talk)

I was referring to the fact that the note said not to add Christopher Nolan. DarkKnight2149 20:22, 30 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

All I'm stating is a similar format on another chart would be beneficial and summarizes all the info so that a reader needn't click each and every film's link to its page in order to learn the information about each of them. I realize the note said not to, but I wonder why not?

Burningblue52 (talk)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eternals (comics), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Titan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 25 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello there! I'm the editor who keeps removing the referenced Han Solo anthology material you add to the article. Seeing as I've done it twice, I made a statement at length regarding my reasons at Talk:Star Wars#Han Solo trilogy?. While I am expressing hesitation, I do want you to know that your edit and willingness to contribute to the article is appreciated and that I have not undone your edits in bad faith. If you'd like to discuss this or have any questions about that article, I suggest you head to that talk page. If you have any other kinds of questions, unrelated to the Star Wars article, I encourage you reach me at my talk page, and I will help you to the best of my ability or help you locate a forum that can better aid you. I wish you luck, and stay well! ~Cheers, TenTonParasol 18:40, 26 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Black Sabbath. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mlpearc (open channel) 00:22, 10 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

• I am a musician by hobby, and know a lot about the band. Associated Acts is the section that is for other acts that the band-mates have been in. I do not need to add reference as you stated, because the references are within the band members themselves. You reverted and unjustly chastised me there, sir.

Burningblue52 (talk)

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at User:Campingfreak3599. Mlpearc (open channel) 17:05, 10 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 17:10, 10 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on This House Is Not for Sale. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 17:17, 10 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

I have not been edit-warring, but simply reverted an edit, and stated the reason that it was reverted. I have not done so multiple times, though I see on the history that other users have done so for the same reasons. If User:Mlpearc has issues with this he needs to take it up on the subject's talk pages as I have done. The issue at hand is said user keeps deleting my talk page suggestions. Someone needs to put that user in check, and correct their disruptive behaviors. Wikipedia requires that edits have references made, as I have done with this particular subject (Bon Jovi). I do not see other users citing their edits/reverts in stating that the album is a 'compilation'. This by default causes their edits to be A) false, and B) subject to in dis-accord with Wikipedia's guidelines. I don't see the issue, nor fault in my stated edits. Burningblue52 (talk)

Why are you posting comments to User pages ? Mlpearc Phone (open channel) 17:39, 10 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.  Doug Weller talk 19:38, 10 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

To be specific, your comment "Hateful words and bullying online (cyberbullying) is against the law, as is hearsay. Stop doing so on other users' talk pages immediately" on an editor's talk pages reads like a legal threat. If you explicitly state that you have no intention of taking legal action or encouraging or suggesting that anyone else might or should, you can be unblocked. Doug Weller talk 19:40, 10 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

FYI: [5] Burningblue was operated by Lorem ipsum5656. See here. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:21, 11 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Anna Frodesiak: That's not a sock. The account was merely renamed. DarkKnight2149 17:12, 11 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi Dark. Ah, you are right. My apologies. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:20, 11 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your name has been placed in the "unknown" section on our members page. Feel free to move it as you see fit! -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 19:50, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

A request to change the title and content of a comics article has begun at Talk:X-Men (film series)#Requested move 7 April 2017. Any interested WikiProject:Comics editor may comment there within one week. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:29, 8 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

There is currently an RfC opened at the above stated talk page, for a retitling of the article. As you have been engaged in the conversation before I thought you'd like to know. Your input, as well as any other editor's is valued for the case of the argument - just follow the link provided above. Have a nice day.--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 11:48, 1 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Note lable, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:20, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply