Anpang

@Bbb23:

I put a comment on this post 3 days ago asking what exactly you meant by me "Clearly not here to build an encyclopedia" and you didn't respond, so I'll just go ahead and assume by your block summary, Clearly not here to build an encyclopedia; disruptive editing; trolling, that you meant this edit on UkrainianStudios' talk page, where I added "socks are cool".

I would like to clarify some stuff. UkrainianStudios is my real-life friend, and there is a running gag at our school about the phrase "socks are cool", and I just put that on his talk page. As you probably misunderstood, by "socks", I meant the word in the gag, not sockpuppets. He saw it, it was all just funny stuff, not serious, disruptive trolling. You could kinda say this is me using Wikipedia as a social networking site, but it's really not. It was just one message. And while I'd argue this is completely fine behavior and doesn't deserve an indefinite ban, I promise I won't do something like this again.

I also suspect you meant the "useless" and "disruptive" templates I created. I got 2 template deletion nominations on this same day you blocked me: {{User garlician-2}} and {{Todo box}}. For the first one, I had to put it in the mainspace because the {{#babel: tag didn't work with templates in userspace, so I also won't do anything like this again. As for the second one though, the reason was No transclusions. Created by indefinitely blocked disruptive editor.. I was going to use it on this page before I got blocked, and the second argument is just because I got blocked. Not really a good argument to delete it.

Really, I consider myself kinda deserving of this, but an indefinite block? Indefinite? Imo that's just way to harsh. It seems from your contribs page that literally everything you do here on Wikipedia as an admin is block people and ignore comments by the blocked people, so I hope you read this, even if you'll reject this appeal for one reason or another.

Thanks. Anpang01 (talk) 15:22, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Unblock requests are to ask for a third party to review, not the blocking admin. You were not just blocked for a specific edit(though the one you mention was probably the last straw). The vast majority of your edits have nothing to do with the encyclopedia from what I see, mostly to your user space and js files. Maybe there's some purpose there that I don't see, but it's not obvious to me. If you have contributions to make, please tell what those are to the next admin. 331dot (talk) 16:04, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

I do edit articles and try to create articles occasionally, like this TheoTown draft, but it never became a live page. I make a user script, Chocolate, so I edit js files in my userspace a lot, which I believe isn't "disruptive editing" and goes into the "Focusing on particular processes" of the "What "not here to build an encyclopedia" is not" (correct me if I'm wrong).

And I promise if I get unblocked, I'll make more edits to the encyclopedia, and I won't create more templates, ever.

Also, I didn't know before this that the admin that reviews unblock requests needs to be a different admin, sorry. Anpang01 (talk) 06:19, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your userpage states I don't really edit Wikipedia, heck I'm pretty sure out of my almost 2,000 global edits, less than 10 are actual article edits. That doesn't sound like what we're here for. Please provide some specific examples of edits you'd like to make to the encyclopedia if unblocked. Also, why did you create Anpang54 and 10gnapnA? Spicy (talk) 23:00, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

• As I said, make the TheoTown draft live, as there's still not an article on the game
• Making redirects on stars, like HR 3243 redirect to HD 69142
• Just correcting spelling mistakes. I found some while browsing but couldn't edit them

I created those alts (and User:Anpangp and User:Ohnoiforgotmypass, not sure why you couldn't IP-check or somethin) on different devices before I got blocked, and you blocked them.

The "I only made 10 actual article edits" number on my userpage is obviously an exxageration, I probably made a lot more encyclopedic edits than that.

Also, could someone explain why making user scripts doesn't go into "Focusing on particular processes"? The policy itself's a little unclear, too. I still believe that making user scripts isn't disruptive editing.

• can only edit while logged into the Anpang01 account.
• no creating or editing templates or scripts or modules for at least six months Then you can appeal that restriction.
• no creating new categories. for at least six months. Then you can appeal that restriction.
• Please be very careful not to edit disruptively, even in ways not already covered. You could be reblocked without warning if any more problems arise.
• It is better to discuss first then to get reblocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply