Andrewrp

Please see my archive for archived conversations. Andrewrp^Tally-ho! 20:20, 21 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

For more info. I am doing this after my account was compromised. Andrewrp^Tally-ho! 02:10, 13 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Andrew, you may wish to consider making a second account for use at public terminals. I did suspect that this was a case of an account being compromised and I'm sure you understand why it was necessary to indeff it. Sorry I wasn't around to unblock you but I work on GMT. Mjroots (talk) 14:46, 13 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Dear sir, throwing the vandalism accusation at me, you have violated WP:AGF. Do you honestly believe that a longtime wikipedian, and admin at a sister project (ru.wikt) would fall as low as vandalizing articles? Please carefully study the paragraph in subject, and you will realize that I improved it, not vandalized. After that, I expect apology. -- Wesha (talk) 23:20, 19 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

P.S. After reviewing the edit history, I realize that I have accidentally deleted the "|thumb" off the Image: tag. Sorry about that. But nevertheless a technical mistake or typo doesn't make vandalism. In the future, please pay closer attention. Always ask yourself question, "why was this done?" -- Wesha (talk) 23:25, 19 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:47, 20 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Triserv-600.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 21:47, 1 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on File:Bahá'í gardens by David Shankbone edit 2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RabidDeity (talk) 05:56, 8 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on File:Bahá'í gardens by David Shankbone edit 1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RabidDeity (talk) 05:58, 8 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Iron giant wiki.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:00, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ABC official choir portrait.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Securel (talk) 18:46, 24 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Irongiant4 wiki.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:20, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Be careful of what you revert[1] to <grin>. Granted the deletion had no edit summary, but the content and history is usually worth checking. Cheers. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 01:36, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

No problem. Your work is much appreciated. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 01:40, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Regarding your report on WP:AN/V, I was looking ath the edits to teh Barrow Raiders article. Are you asserting that the names the editor is added is inconsistent with the currently cited source[2]? That the source is inaccurate or outdated? Or some other problem? Please clarify. Thanks. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 02:10, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

The info was not cited.It seemed the previous players were correct.Andrewrp^Tally-ho! 20:49, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Andrewrp! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:06, 25 October 2011 (UTC).Reply

The BLP policy applies to article pages and to discussion pages like articles for deletion; there is nowhere on Wikipedia where it is appropriate to insult or defame living people. I've removed your vote in the discussion, feel free to repost it without the insults. Nathan ^T 14:09, 8 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

There is currently a straw poll taking place here. Your input would be appreciated. — GabeMc (talk) 06:14, 3 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello. There is currently a discussion at WP:ANI regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User North8000 disruptive talk page editing at talk:Homophobia. Thank you. - MrX 19:57, 16 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, Andrewrp, for all you do on Wikipedia, especially deleting vandalism on my personal pages. Regards, Pinethicket (talk) 19:36, 10 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

why did you undo that edit?Wingman1 20:01, 10 June 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wingman1 (talk • contribs)

Sorry about that...

 

Hello, Andrewrp. You have new messages at Seonookim's talk page.
Message added 05:59, 11 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

I don't have a lot of WP-time this June, you can wait or ask someone else. Seonookim (What I've done so far) (I'm busy here) (Tell me your requests) 05:59, 11 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Write something - try and contribute to a DYK or GA. Take a look at WP:GAN and try and review someone's nomination about a subject you know something about. Writing content helps one appreciate the effort that is put into it. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:22, 17 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Try not to spend overwhelming amounts of time in areas which are sites of frequent conflict such as WP:AFD and WP:AN/I, especially if you have a short temper.

Lots of gnome work to do - what are you interested in? Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:26, 17 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

• Apologies, I was very busy in the past few weeks. I will take a look and give you some feedback soon. :) - Mailer Diablo 13:44, 22 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello Andrewrp. Thank you for nominating me to be an administrator. I accept and have completed the necessary requirements. See my request page here: . Oanabay04 (talk) 20:21, 22 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anti-protest laws in Ukraine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 23 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 03:43, 23 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

I removed unsourced material, and you reverted it.

Please refer to WikiProject:Magic, particularly the section that reads:

The method of this article was deleted because it had no attribution, source, or citation. See Wikipedia:Verifiability, and Wikipedia:No original research. This is also in accordance with Wikipedia:WikiProject:Magic policy, as stated below: If information about a method is quoted from another freely available source then it becomes more difficult for magicians to argue that Wikipedia is the point at which exposure is occurring. Proper citation of sources should also help to defend Wikipedia against any action for breach of confidentiality. In addition, some unsourced information on methods that has crept into Wikipedia appears speculative and inaccurate, which undermines the quality of the Magic Project generally and contravenes WP:NOR It is therefore especially vital to adhere to WP:Attribution. -- If a method is added to an article but no reference is provided the following from WP:Attribution will apply: "Any edit lacking attribution may be removed, and the final burden of evidence lies with the editor wishing to add or retain the material." Given the sections above about controversial material and original research this can be applied immediately and overrides the practice of tagging information as unsourced and then waiting for a period to see whether citations are subsequently provided. A request for sources for a method should be placed on the talk page. Only when a full citation can be provided can the method be added to the article. It is recommended that a link to these guidelines be included in the message. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShimmeryPhantom (talk • contribs) 01:09, 13 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I notice you're on Wikipedia:List of administrator hopefuls. Wikipedia would benefit from more admins. If you have been editing for more than 12 months (preferably 24+ months), and have been editing fairly consistently for the past 6 months (preferably 12+ months) with at least 100 edits a month (this tool will help) - or an explanation for any gaps, and haven't been blocked in the past three years - or a good explanation for a recent block, don't have a recent history of edit warring or arguing with other editors, feel you can explain why you wish to be an admin, can demonstrate some understanding of Wikipedia's procedures and processes, or know where to go for guidance, and are confident enough to go through a RfA, please get in touch with me. We can talk about it some more, and if all looks OK, I'll nominate you. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 01:57, 31 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I notice you are not active at the moment. No worries. I'll mark you down on my list as not active at the moment, but if you do become active again, please do get in touch so we can talk in detail about how likely you are to meet the criteria to become an admin, or what you need to be doing to improve your chances. Regards SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 16:06, 8 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi Andrewrp,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

I tried to improve fire alarm call box (with this dynamic IP address) by specifying that VoIP equipment needs external power to run, rather than just "power" period. But that improvement got reverted by a user who doesn't understand telephony enough to know that PSTN lines have their own power that basic phones run on. ("Well, DUH, what did you think the basic phones ran on: magic fairy dust?") So before I added the improvement that he faultily reverted, the article made the errant implication that the only kind of line power comes from mains, hence my having added clarification words such as "external" to "power," to indicate to the people whom my above parenthetical phrase applies to that PSTN lines have their own power, while the article already covers that VoIP and the charging of cell phones takes another source of line power. So let's agree to use my improvement in this regard, rather than regressing the article to a less correct form, shall we?

I left this at the talk page there. Will you please come and help out?

Thanks, if so,

97.117.49.188 (talk) 09:23, 7 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Animaniacs.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Pbroks13 (talk) 15:11, 14 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

The file File:Wegener signature.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 14 February 2020 (UTC)Reply