Amaekuma

  Hello. Your recent edit to List of people from Ebonyi State appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 17:04, 11 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

They are not non-notable? I intend creating those pages Amaekuma (talk) 18:03, 11 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of people from Ebonyi State. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
The article clearly states ♦♦♦ Only add a person to this list if they already have their own article on the English Wikipedia ♦♦♦, so don't add them until their articles have been accepted - Arjayay (talk) 18:06, 11 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for contributing to the article Draft:Adamu Garba II. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 15:21, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thanks for reaching out to me.

Cited in the draft are reliable third party sources ranging from BBC to many other reputable Nigerian media houses. If you find the tone of the draft bias, it's obviously because Adamu is a controversial character and that isn't my fault. Those are their words not mine. Amaekuma (talk) 11:49, 27 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi - I see you've asked a number of users to be your mentor. You would be better off asking at the Teahouse or one of the active users listed Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's Area rather than targetting users at random. Sorry, but I don't have the time or level of involvement to help you at present, though I wish you luck in finding someone who can. — Voice of Clam 08:48, 13 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Amaekuma (talk) 16:50, 13 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Amaekuma

Thank you for creating Cross (BBNaija).

User:Zippybonzo, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Fabulous Article, I reviewed it as you requested on my UTP, thanks for creating it.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Zippybonzo}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

| Zippybonzo | Talk | 14:20, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello @Zippybonzo:. Thanks for your encouraging words. You're appreciated! Amaekuma (talk) 16:28, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Ab207. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Project K (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.
Please do not restore unsourced info. The WP:BURDEN is on you to make sure it's verifiable, even if you were simply reverting an edit. Diff: [1] Ab207 (talk) 05:37, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello @Ab207:, I 'undid' vandalism on the page, so I don't understand what you mean. Amaekuma (talk) 06:01, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Recommend reading WP:VANDALISM: "Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, any good faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism." The IP was simply removing unsourced character names in good faith, so it is far from being called "vandalism." Reverting such an edit doesn't improve the encyclopedia, it only worsens by perpetuating the unsourced content present in the article. Hope you understand. Regards -- Ab207 (talk) 06:09, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Even though what you're typing here to me makes no sense whatsoever, I acknowledge you. Bye. Amaekuma (talk) 12:44, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

I reversed the edit because an anonymous user was removing content so I reversed it to the last known good edit.

Did the anonymous user include citation to the edit he deleted? An anonymous user can't just remove information that has been on Wikipedia without providing citation.

I stand by what I did because it's the right thing. @Ab207:.

Amaekuma (talk) 18:00, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

They are free to remove unverifiable information from the encyclopedia. Also, how can anyone logically provide a citation to remove the information? The burden of proof lies on those who adds/restores the material, NOT the one who removes. Unsourced content can never be the "last known good edit."

You could say that the IP didn't explain their removal in edit summary but even you didn't give an edit summary which could have helped others in judging the situation. So kindly try to use edit summaries when reverting other's edits. -- Ab207 (talk) 18:20, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Ab207: I don't need to give an edit summary when reversing vandalism using the undo button, that is the rule.

I acknowledge you for reaching out, and I don't mean to sound rude however this conversation is done because it isn't heading anywhere.

Amaekuma (talk) 19:34, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kim Oprah. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please do not restore trivial information to BLPs, and please indicate, in an edit summary, what you are doing. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 14:01, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello Drmies. Calling my edit disruptive is overreacting and far-reaching.

You made an edit where you removed well sourced information about her personal life calling them "trivial". You can't describe things about someone's personal life as "trivial", especially since everyone has different tastes and what is important to one person might not be important to another. Also, personal life subsection is meant to contain more informal and casual information than maybe a career subsection. That is my thought process. And I don't believe you know everything. Amaekuma (talk) 16:20, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Unexplained reinsertion of challenged material is disruptive--it's really quite simple. And no, "personal life" still needs to be encyclopedic, sourced, and relevant. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 14:57, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Mr Drmies, I just have the feeling that you have the 'need' to be right everytime. The material you removed has maybe six citations and you still call it unsourced? But hey, do whatever pleases you. Have a nice day. Amaekuma (talk) 09:14, 15 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

As a Nigerian editor, I am happy to meet and interact with a fellow Nigerian editor on Wikipedia. Charlesvet88 (talk) 18:10, 10 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nice to meet you too Charlesvet88 Amaekuma (talk) 20:51, 10 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Hipal (talk) 18:46, 30 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Amaekuma,

Thank you for creating Paul O.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Any webpage with click bait adverts isn’t what I would call reliable, please do add some more accurate sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Zippybonzo}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 06:04, 14 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Okay. I am learning everyday. Thanks @Zippybonzo: Amaekuma (talk) 07:20, 14 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, List of candidates in the 2023 Nigerian general elections, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PS: What’s the essence of this list though? It doesn't look encyclopaedic. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 04:43, 1 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Reading Beans Hello. I don't mean to be rude or come across as abrasive, however I'm data analyst and I know for a fact that one of the best sources of properly vetted data is getting data that is generated by government. That's why I cited the official website of INEC; who are the government department in charge of elections in Nigeria.

However, if you need me to put in other third party sources on the page, I can. I already put one third party source but they all got their data from the INEC source and it's just going to be a repetition. Amaekuma (talk) 07:04, 1 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Amaekuma, that’s not the point. This list is already in 2023 Nigerian presidential election. It’s already there. The list—-to me—-does not seem to be encyclopaedic. Are there list of this for the presidential election of other countries? Best, Reading Beans (talk) 07:15, 1 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Exactly Reading Beans, you missed the whole point. The idea of this is for the general elections (presidential, guber, senate) and what you're showing me is for just the presidential elections. I intend to keep expanding the list. Your message came in by 4AM local time (I was sleeping so I wasn't editing). Amaekuma (talk) 09:56, 1 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

These are just two similar links. One is presidential and one is general. Bye. PS if you wanna help Wikipedia improve, help by assisting me work on the page. Though you aren't obligated to, that's a nice place to start

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candidates_in_the_2016_Philippine_presidential_election

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candidates_in_the_2008_New_Zealand_general_election_by_electorate

Reading Beans

An article you recently created, Ojy Okpe, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 22:52, 22 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

 

Happy New Year!

Amaekuma,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 02:54, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 02:54, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you my brother @Abishe: Amaekuma (talk) 11:57, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

For future reference, when you're moving a page from draft to mainspace, the equation is not "add categories while the page is still in draft form and then move the page afterward" -- it's "move page and then add categories afterward", because doing it backward can sometimes cause other unintended issues. Less than a week ago, I had to manually redo a page move by somebody else who had done the same thing, because the act of having added the categories first and then moving the page second caused the redirect from the draft title to linger on system maintenance reports days after it shouldn't have been there anymore, so I had to put the page back into draft and then redo the move a second time to fix it. So it's not "add categories first, move page second" -- it's "move page first, add categories second". And it's also not "revert prior removal of categories that weren't allowed to be there while the page was in draft form", either: reverting is only for "this edit was actually incorrect or improper in the first place", not for "the page is now being moved so now it's time to readd the categories". Bearcat (talk) 00:25, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Kristy Scott, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 19:26, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amaekuma (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 102.91.54.12. IP Block exemption just expired (I had it for six months) and I’ll need it permanently. I had complained about this before. Amaekuma (talk) 10:52, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

IP 102.91.54.12 isn't blocked. SQL^{Query Me!} 15:42, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Amaekuma (talk) 09:52, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Amaekuma. Thank you for your work on Oluwole Omofemi. User:The Night Watch, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Well done! That was a very interesting read!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|The Night Watch}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

The Night Watch (talk) 15:00, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello Amaekuma! Your additions to Kelechi Onuzuruike have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:40, 31 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Adetola Nola, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. UtherSRG (talk) 12:50, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Amaekuma. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of candidates in the 2023 Nigerian general elections, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This "30 under 30" rubbish tells us that this is a puff piece for a non notable "entrepreneur" The prior AfD still holds good. There is nothing here but WP:BOMBARD and WP:ADMASQ

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adetola Nola and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:52, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

“30 under 30" rubbish? Really? Are you sure you wanna go down this path? Amaekuma (talk) 04:43, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Amaekuma! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:52, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jackie Aina, you may be blocked from editing. Nswix (talk) 13:52, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tsehay Hawkins, you may be blocked from editing. Nswix (talk) 13:53, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Nswix (talk) 16:37, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Amaekuma. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kim Oprah, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Okagbue, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Okagbue until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andy Chukwu, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Chukwu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Amaekuma. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Isaac Bholu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Amaekuma. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of candidates in the 2023 Nigerian general elections".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:42, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Amaekuma. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kennedy Nnadi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:05, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mayowa Adenekan, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayowa Adenekan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Amaekuma. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ESEP Le Berger Université, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:05, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Amaekuma. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ESEP Le Berger Université".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:43, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Amaekuma. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Neo Akpofure, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:08, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Amaekuma. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kim Oprah".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:27, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Funnybros is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Funnybros until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Gabriel (talk to me ) 00:31, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Okagbue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Okagbue (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Gabriel (talk to me ) 00:50, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply