161.51.11.2

 

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been deleted, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | interiot's tool | page moves | block log | block list]

 

I have reverted a recent edit you made to the article Houston, Texas. You did not provide an edit summary, and I could not determine whether the edit was vandalism or a constructive contribution. In the future, please use edit summaries. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. the_undertow ^talk 09:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Banbury. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Geniac 17:30, 9 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Dark Falls ^talk 07:10, 16 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Pats1 03:58, 11 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from any site that uses the MediaWiki spam blacklist, which includes all of Wikimedia and Wikipedia.

Your recent edit to Star Wars music (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. For future editing tests use the sandbox. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 13:59, 15 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Ruth Westheimer, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Click here for details of your recent vandalism. Alansohn 03:19, 26 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Your recent edit to M24 Sniper Weapon System (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 17:02, 17 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to M24 Sniper Weapon System. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Neranei (talk) 17:09, 17 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Your recent edit to Armoor (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses/phone numbers or YouTube/Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr or related links to a non-talk page. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II (talk) 11:30, 23 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jackalope, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Quintote 20:20, 30 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

  This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Tamar of Georgia, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nn123645 (talk) 07:57, 4 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

I noticed that you had irrationally removed 'Image:Gracia.jpg' from article Hosokawa Gracia. I advise that you do not perform such an action when considering that their isn't any backing rationale behind why it should be removed or ammended, thus making it unconditionally appropriate to the respective article. Please do not impulsively act in such a manner again, for I don't want to have to waste my time undoing irrational edits made by other users. User talk:Exiled Ambition 15 January 2008 (EST)

 

Hi, the recent edit you made to Harbhajan Mann has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks —Animum (talk) 01:55, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I rolled back your recent change to Stochastic volatility because it seemed malformed. Please feel free to resubmit if you were in the middle of adding content. Ronnotel (talk) 15:11, 28 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to David Carradine. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Gwernol 12:45, 6 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Doolittle raid, you will be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 07:33, 18 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please note, in Second Tuareg Rebellion, Nigerien = Niger. Nigerian = Nigeria. As we're speaking of people from the nation of Niger, Nigerian is innappropriate. Just a heads up, but thanks for trying to improve wikipedia (that's why we all edit one another). Please fix any other mistakes you might find! T L Miles (talk) 14:03, 29 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Albion House, Liverpool has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bwordpress\.com' (link(s): http://viviangrant.wordpress.com/2008/04/27/liverpool-history-albion-house-white-star/) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:30, 12 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. MER-C 09:47, 25 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Tampa Bay Buccaneers. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 00:59, 8 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for noticing that the internal link to D'Israeli, Isaac. was missing. --Old Moonraker (talk) 06:50, 9 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wig, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. KCinDC (talk) 14:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Mint (candy). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. KCinDC (talk) 14:56, 9 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Get Smart has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:15, 14 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Washington State Route 504. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~~ ComputerGuy 01:25, 23 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Braveheart has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Trusilver 07:49, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page KBR (company) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. DanielDeibler (talk) 05:32, 7 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Necrophilia has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 13:22, 16 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Faizan Al-Badri. An edit that you recently made to Ethernet seemed to be a test and it has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Faizan (talk) 11:21, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/cement bonded particle board (CBPB), a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 05:59, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello 161.51.11.2. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled cement bonded particle board (CBPB).

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/cement bonded particle board (CBPB)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. -- ^t numbermaniac ^c 05:24, 17 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of countries by number of military and paramilitary personnel ‎ , but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:42, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Will Wood. GiantSnowman 13:29, 14 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Infinity Knight. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Little Brampton have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Infinity Knight (talk) 14:28, 8 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm ButterCashier. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Emmanuel Stephens, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ButterCashier (talk) 13:03, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Reply