Talk:Shipham

This article says "Shipham Hill is the highest point in the Mendips at 1066 feet", however Black Down, Somerset says "The summit of Black Down is Beacon Batch, the highest point of the Mendip Hills" and the Beacon Batch article claims 325 m (1068 ft) - this gives the impression that Shipham Hill is not the highest point. Can anyone verify?— Rod ^talk 08:44, 30 June 2006 (UTC).Reply

I have modified the claim for Shipham Hill. It would need some accurate surveying to rank these two hills. JMcC 09:59, 2 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

I think the section on stock car racing needs to be rewritten in less emotive langauge more suitable for an encyclopedia. Although the mendip raceway should certainly be mentioned I don't understand "race "specials" to compete in full contact competition. The big-league formula has winged cars with 500+ horsepower V-8 motors, and the smaller F2 cars have 2-litre four-bangers, lightweight but hardy." - but I don't have the specialist knowledge to rewrite it. I would also be interested to know what makes it a "working man's sport" and "oft misunderstood" and see some references to support these assertions.— Rod ^talk 12:29, 3 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Shipham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051123034758/http://www.walkingontheweb.co.uk/Defined%20Routes/Limestone%20Link%20Path.htm to http://www.walkingontheweb.co.uk/Defined%20Routes/Limestone%20Link%20Path.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060220141352/http://www.shiphamfirstschool.ik.org/ to http://www.shiphamfirstschool.ik.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:41, 8 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Shipham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111006150530/http://www.mendipenvironmentforum.org.uk/cpre/calorvoty2008_shipham_01.html to http://www.mendipenvironmentforum.org.uk/cpre/calorvoty2008_shipham_01.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:24, 12 May 2017 (UTC)Reply