Talk:Kryo

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Arm Ltd.#Built on Arm Cortex Technology licensees|Built on ARM Cortex Technology (BoC) license]] The anchor (#Built on Arm Cortex Technology licensees) has been deleted by other users before.
[[Kryo#/Kryo 680|Kryo 680 Gold]]
[[Kryo#/Kryo 680|Kryo 680 Silver]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

plagarism

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

@Rajat491: Thank you for your recent addition of the Kyro 260. However, please do not copy text from the source verbatim. This is plagarism and is a violation of wikipedia policy (see WP:PLAGIARISM). I would suggest summarizing the material instead. Dbsseven (talk) 14:26, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

move

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I suggest we move this article from "Kryo (microarchitecture)" to simply "Kryo". There are now at least five iterations of Kryo (original, A53 derived, A73 derived, A55 derived, and A75 derived), so it is not a "microarchitecture" so much as "microarchitectures", or probably more precisely a CPU brand. I don't think it's particularly controversial, so I'm not going to {{Merge}}. But I'm posting here in case anyone objects. Dbsseven (talk) 22:02, 6 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

need reception

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

need info on how well received these cores are. relative performance etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.248.79.199 (talk) 14:46, 5 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Octa-core (4×1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4×1.6 GHz Kryo 240)

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Octa-core (4×1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4×1.6 GHz Kryo 240) 103.102.132.255 (talk) 05:59, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic