Talk:Free Access to Law Movement

I have started trying to reorganise this page, but it has some distance to go. I'm a Co-Director of an LII (AustLII), so if anyone thinks any of my edits show bias toward any of my own projects, please change them, or comment here (or both). The main purpose of my editing so far has been: (i) to add a full list of all members of the Free Access to Law Movement (FALM) to replace the very incomplete list that was there (external links for most of the 40 still have to be added); (ii) to move the details of the few LIIs that were included on the page to new pages, one for each LII (some already exist), with links from the complete list; (iii) to add a few references to articles about the history of development of LIIs and development of LIIs in multiple countries. Two of the four listed are by me, but they survey LII developments generally and contain numerous references to articles about other specific LIIs. Additions of other articles surveying this field would be valuable. GrahamGreenleaf (talk) 13:38, 20 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

There is a lot more to the free law movement than the LII organizations listed in the article as it stands. If I had the information at my fingertips I would add it now, but clearly this will take a little time to gather and present. Natcolley (talk) 17:47, 17 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

You are well come to contribute and improve article legal awareness.

Mahitgar (talk) 12:49, 31 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Free Access to Law Movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051228112441/http://www.canlii.org:80/ to http://www.canlii.org/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051228112441/http://www.canlii.org:80/ to http://www.canlii.org/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051228112441/http://www.canlii.org:80/ to http://www.canlii.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:34, 5 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Free Access to Law Movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051108061137/http://www.glin.gov/ to http://www.glin.gov/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:10, 7 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

At the moment, this article seems to be about a particular consortium of affiliated organizations. If it were about a movement, then it would include discussion of many of the items linked in the see also list. Which should this article be? I'd like to see an article about the broader movement, and am debating if it should be added to this article or split. Daask (talk) 18:26, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply