Talk:Dakota Access Pipeline protests

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dakota Access Pipeline protests article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 31 days

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Indigenous peoples of North America High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology: Social Movements Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the social movements task force.

United States: North Dakota Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Dakota portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Dakota.

Climate change Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.

Copied Standing Rock Indian Reservation (oldid, history) → Dakota Access Pipeline protests (diff) on 2016-10-24
Copied Bakken pipeline (oldid, history) → Dakota Access Pipeline protests (diff) on 2016-10-24
Merged ReZpect Our Water (history) → Dakota Access Pipeline protests on 2016-10-26
Copied Dakota Access Pipeline protests (oldid, history) → Dakota Access Pipeline (diff) on 2016-12-13
Copied Dakota Access Pipeline protests (oldid, history) → Dakota Access Pipeline (diff) on 2017-01-08
Copied Dakota Access Pipeline (oldid, history) → Dakota Access Pipeline protests (diff) on 2017-03-01

RfC: "Standing Rock Protests" as alternative name

Latest comment: 1 month ago9 comments7 people in discussion

Should "Standing Rock Protests" appear as an alternative name in the lead sentence? إيان (talk) 21:56, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Recommend closing as too soon. See thread above. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:59, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yes it should, given ngrams, WP:COMMONNAME, and MOS:LEADALT. إيان (talk) 22:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Support Given how many times "Standing Rock" has been mentioned by the article alone, this needs to be mentioned as an alternative title. >>> Extorc.talk 09:40, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

If you are referring to the Wikipedia article, it is mentioned zero times. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:22, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yes, it's fine to mention in the introductory paragraph. Yuchitown (talk) 18:03, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yes Standing Rock protests should be in the lead sentence. It has been widely used by all the major newspapers, including but not limited to: The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Guardian, The Globe and Mail, The Times, Wall Street Journal, The Boston Globe, Associated Press, The Independent, The Canadian Press, Los Angeles Times. Also found it being used in at least a dozen scholarly journals. Unclear why a RfC was needed for this. Isaidnoway (talk) 23:13, 26 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yes, in bold, in the first sentence, due to overwhelming use. It might be appropriate to submit a requested move for this page to that title, per WP:COMMONNAME. Fieari (talk) 06:15, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yes, the name is mentioned in common parlance, perhaps more even than the Dakota Access name. DrFiveMinusMinus (talk) 11:18, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic