Talk:Currie Hall

I've tried to rewrite this article to eliminate confusion. It is still confusing and needs lots of work. For instance, the article is titled "Currie Hall", but much of the article refers to "the Currie Building". There is also reference to "the Great Hall". What is this? This should be clarified. I took out the chart since it is irrelevant. The article is about the hall; it is not a history of the Canadian divisions. Also, is this a residence? From what I can tell, it is not, so I took out the residence cat. I also removed a non existent category and lots of redundant text - text/info. that was repeated throughout the article. Could the original editor please revisit this article to clear up these things. I've done what I could. She seems to know a lot, and has lots of sources but it needs to be written with clarity in mind.  BC  _{talk to me} 17:00, 15 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

I've just hacked away at this article. It isn't much better but I think that I've left sufficient clues so that other editors with access to the sources and perhaps even personal experience can pick up the traces and carry on. Photographs in this article are awful – especially those of Emily Warren's work. Surely there must be better images out there.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 19:21, 26 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Currie Hall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090109143712/http://www.historicplaces.ca:80/visit-visite/affichage-display.aspx?id=4389 to http://www.historicplaces.ca/visit-visite/affichage-display.aspx?id=4389

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:53, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Currie Hall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120306170704/http://www.gcinfo.ca/currie.htm to http://www.gcinfo.ca/currie.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:26, 3 December 2016 (UTC)Reply