Talk:Belvedere

This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Disambiguation This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

I'm not sure how to do it, but these topics (4 on one page) need to be split up into seperate articles. Just read.

I'm puzzled by what you mean. The topics are meant to be all on one page because the page is a disambiguation page i.e it directs you to the actual articles. This is a standard Wikipedia technique. Adrian Pingstone 20:26, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I posted the above before it was made into a disambig; I didn't know how to make one.

Sorry, my mistake - Adrian Pingstone 18:44, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Isn't there a structure in Central Park, New York City called 'Belvedere Castle'? --Zahra 19:23, 12 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

What's the exact Italian phrase? Is it one word, "Belvedere" or "Bel ve dere", etc? "Bella vista" is one tranlsation of "beautiful view". -- Ralph Corderoy (talk) 12:47, 28 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

QUESTION: Should the MC Escher Belvedere be under the heading Fictional buildings or Artwork? The point is, it is a drawing, not a building. The drawing is titled Belvedere but there is more pictured than a building (sky, background, landmarks etc.). I think it should be under the heading Artwork because the drawing is not a matter of truth or fiction, but of the concept Belvedere. From another perspective, consider an artwork titled Belvedere that did not actually picture a rendering of a building. Would it be considered a Fictional building or artwork by the title Belvedere. My point is, we are letting our subjective interpretation take hold if we use the term Fictional building but we are not if we say Artwork by the title of:. Hmmmm --71.238.174.13 (talk) 04:15, 27 August 2010 (UTC)Reply