[go: up one dir, main page]

Talk:Baltic area runestones

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Runestones on multiple pages

edit

would it be appropriate to designate a primary page for runestones that are on multiple pages, such as U 439 which is one of the Ingvar runestones, so that listed data does not conflict? Deanlaw (talk) 20:10, 27 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nameing

edit

Looks bad to me to call the page "Baltic *area* runestones", the stones are not found in the baltic area but commemorates people going on expeditions into that area, should be named expedition instead in my taste. --81.229.102.134 (talk) 17:14, 1 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Baltic area runestones/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Pretty good article. I would like to see more in-text citations and better wikification though. The writing could also be improved and grammer edited. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 02:26, 24 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 14:13, 10 March 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 08:54, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Baltic area runestones. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:25, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply