Talk:Aetosaur
Aetosaur has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
edit- This review is transcluded from Talk:Aetosaur/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:08, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
I will make straighforward copyedits as I go and jot queries below. Please revert if I inadvertently change the meaning. Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:08, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
I was thinking a link to a wiktionary definition for quadrangular might be worthwhile.
...in the society's quarterly journal - I thought the link was going to be to the specific journal, otherwsie I don't think it is helpful
- The journal (now called Journal of the Geological Society[1]) currently doesn't have its own article, so I didn't provide a link.
para 3 in the History section is a little slim. Given the German find sounds like a valuable one, can it be embellished with a sentence or three?
nomen nudum - should be italicised as a foreign (Latin) term (?)
- Yes, you're right about that. Smokeybjb (talk) 16:53, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
1. Well written?:
- Prose quality:
- Manual of Style compliance:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
- References to sources:
- Citations to reliable sources, where required:
- No original research:
3. Broad in coverage?:
- Major aspects:
- Focused:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
- Fair representation without bias:
5. Reasonably stable?
- No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
- Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
- Pass or Fail: - nice work, prose flows very well I find. You intending to take it to FAC? Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:40, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
- That wasn't my original intention, but I might try it out. Thanks for the review! Smokeybjb (talk) 21:02, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Aetosaur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060315212944/http://www.dinosauria.com/dml/names/aetoi.htm to http://www.dinosauria.com/dml/names/aetoi.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:18, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Aetosaur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100627062541/http://www.peabody.yale.edu/scipubs/bulletins_postillas/ypmP016_1953.pdf to http://www.peabody.yale.edu/scipubs/bulletins_postillas/ypmP016_1953.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120309062222/http://palaeontology.palass-pubs.org/pdf/Vol%2041/Pages%201215-1230.pdf to http://palaeontology.palass-pubs.org/pdf/Vol%2041/Pages%201215-1230.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110706163103/http://acd.ufrj.br/ismar/3/3_18.pdf to http://acd.ufrj.br/ismar/3/3_18.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100714230435/https://www.vertpaleo.org/society/documents/ExecutiveCommitteestatement.pdf to http://www.vertpaleo.org/society/documents/ExecutiveCommitteestatement.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060313165459/http://www.palaeos.com/Vertebrates/Units/270Archosauromorpha/270.800.html to http://www.palaeos.com/Vertebrates/Units/270Archosauromorpha/270.800.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:23, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
22 aetosaurs
editsee link https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02724634.2023.2168196 new studies concluding they are juveniles. 2A02:A03F:851E:6000:21D0:9C6C:38C5:A56C (talk) 22:35, 14 February 2023 (UTC)