This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article currently appears to have been copied without separate understanding from 2+ sources who all profoundly disagreed with each other about what the term should cover in modern English. The illustrations are from c. 310 while the text says that only Byzantine issues are currently properly covered by the term. If it's still used to cover all 'coins we can't be arsed to specifically identify' then the article should just say that. If it's now restricted to specific issues with specific compositions, notional purities, diameters, and weights, then the article should provide them. — LlywelynII10:20, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
