Talk:MacDonnell of Antrim

Still researching trying to find where to differenciate from the Clan MacDonald of Dunnyveg mjgm84 15:27, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Try http://www.stirnet.com/HTML/genie/british/mac/macdonald05.htm .—Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.137.79.247 (talk • contribs) November 2006

I corrected the Clan Donald article that erroniously stated each sept of Clan Donald was a separate clan. Clan Donald has several branches that are neither separate clans or septs of Clan Donald. For a detailed explanation see www.clandonald-heritage.com. I corrected the Wikipedia article on Clan Donald, but was unable to correct the links to Wikipedia sites erroniously named Clan MacDonald or MacDonnell of Antrim etc.

The McDonnells of Antrim spell their name Mc as do many members of Clan Donald. Neither the current chief or members of this branch spell it MacDonald. The various spellings is one reason the clan is Clan Donald rather than Clan MacDonald. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lmcdonald49 (talk • contribs) 20:00, 17 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Why has this article been changed to "MacDonnell of the Glens". It is recognised by the official High council of Clan Donald as "of Antrim". They are also recognised as being a branch of the Scottish Clan Donald even though they are based in Ireland. See: http://www.highcouncilofclandonald.org/ mjgm84 (talk) 13:35, 1 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

The reason is that they are completely based in Ireland and have little contact with the main mass in Scotland. In Ireland, where they actually live, they are known and style themselves as the MacDonnells of the Glens. The Scottish High Council of Clan Donald has no authority over the Irish branch. DinDraithou (talk) 13:49, 1 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Let me also add that they became Irish before the rest of Clan Donald really became Scots. Today they share a genealogical connection only. DinDraithou (talk) 14:00, 1 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have tried to replace the Ulster-Scots translation of the name with Gaelic, as the McDonnells were Catholic Gaelic speakers from the Scottish Highlands. As anyone with any knowledge about Scotland knows, the 'Scots' language has never been, and is not spoken in the highlands, but in the Lowlands. Ulster-Scots was also spoken only by Protestant settlers from the Scottish Lowlands who came later than the McDonnells. Therefore, wouldn't it be better to have a Gaelic translation than an irrelevant and misleading Ulster-Scots translation? Every time I have tried to implement this my edits have been undone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.4.122.233 (talk) 18:51, 16 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

The reason there is an Ulster-Scots translation is because Ulster-Scots, along with Irish Gaelic and English, is one of the three official languages of Northern Ireland, where Antrim is located. I see no reason why the Scottish Gaelic translation can't be included, too, though. — Jon C.^ॐ 11:12, 17 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Okay, yes, having both languages is probably the best way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.4.122.233 (talk) 12:09, 17 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MacDonnell of Antrim. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120903154513/http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/dunlucecastleus.pdf to http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/dunlucecastleus.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:56, 29 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MacDonnell of Antrim. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100704070440/http://www.finlaggan.com/page/20.asp to http://www.finlaggan.com/page/20.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:56, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply