Talk:48th New Zealand Parliament

Is it correct to say Rod Donald's death was a "change during term" when he died before the day he was to be sworn in to the 48th parliament? 13:15, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

It's close enough; he was elected to serve in that particular term. On another note, please register an account, anonymous person. Ambi 13:46, 11 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Actually, he never swore an oath, so he never became an MP, even though he was an MP-elect --LeftyG 02:57, 28 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

The sortable table needs some sorting out. The colors don't sort, and the term column doesn't sort properly. 203.109.174.60 22:45, 13 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have seen table sorting before where the table is not sorted by the contents, rather a "secret" word or nickname that readers will be more familiar with. I will check up in the next couple of days and sort the colours by party name and the term column numerically (now the terms are sorted alphabetically, and the colours have no sortable data). -- THE DARK LORD TROMBONATOR 11:12, 5 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

OK, I've done it. However, the colours won't sort because there is no text there. Term column is good though! -- THE DARK LORD TROMBONATOR 11:01, 16 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have noticed that recently some MPs who entered this Parliament after the beginning of its term found their way into the "initial composition" list and were then removed, as they were not part of the initial Parliament. Good, but why are Taito Phillip Field and Gordon Copeland shown as independents on this list? They are now, but in the initial composition of Parliament, they were members of Labour and United Future, respectively, which is why they are shown under "Changes during term." Should this be changed?MAC475 07:18, 22 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

A month and a half's gone by, and no one's answered me. Unless someone says something in the next few days, I'll change it.MAC475 23:15, 6 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I would agree that it should be changed, although I wonder if the whole format for this page should be different — the mistake could easily be repeated. While the current format works for historical parliaments, which don't change, maybe something else is needed for a parliament currently in session? (I'm just thinking aloud, not proposing anything specific). -- Vardion 00:51, 7 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Interesting thought. Should we change it? Or do you have any ideas on a new format for a sitting parliament? (I certainly don't.)MAC475 06:39, 7 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Perhaps we could have two tables - initial composition, and a "current composition" one. Probably a waste of space, and the changes during term still need to be noted. Maybe the table should simply be named "Composition" with the changes during term noted at the bottom. --Lholden 06:52, 7 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I think that having an up-to-date table of the current composition, with notes at the end pointing out the changes, is probably the best way to go for a current Parliament. Just my opinion, of course. -- Vardion 21:30, 7 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

So should we leave Copeland and Field as they are, and swap Donald, Sutton, Brash and Beyer for Tanczos, Chauvel, Shanks and Soper?MAC475 00:25, 8 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I may be late chiming in here, but perhaps another column "additional notes" may be in order. We can have a short summary (e.g. "retired from Parliament") with a footnote to the bit at the bottom we currently have, for more detail. -- THE DARK LORD TROMBONATOR 11:14, 5 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Some media reports suggest that Steve Maharey, although resigning from Cabinet, isn't resigning from Parliament — if so, he probably shouldn't be mentioned under the Changes heading. But I'm not sure what the situation is. -- Vardion 05:48, 19 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've significantly changed the table on elected MPs elected at this Parliament, firstly so we can have some sort of uniformity across parliaments and elections from 1853 to 2011 plus. Most of the information (who does what, and with who) is available at Caucuses and MPs' responsibilities in the 48th New Zealand Parliament, and repeating it here only makes the basic info (who is in Parliament) that much harder to access. Gone too is the full page-width table and lists of previous elections, both of which I felt made the table difficult to read. This page now does not need constant updating over the next 25 years until the last MP elected here resigns or dies. Results are now in template format and shared with New Zealand general election, 2005 - a page with similar issues as this one. Fan N | talk 02:35, 24 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 48th New Zealand Parliament. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080630003711/http://theyworkforyou.co.nz/resignations/2008/apr/01/dianne_yates_nz_labour to http://theyworkforyou.co.nz/resignations/2008/apr/01/dianne_yates_nz_labour
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100515131716/http://theyworkforyou.co.nz/list_member_vacancy/2008/apr/01 to http://theyworkforyou.co.nz/list_member_vacancy/2008/apr/01

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:51, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply