Talk:3-inch gun M5

This should be merged with the 3-inch M1918 gun as this is the much better article and the single section might be better incorporated into this one. --Tirronan (talk) 06:43, 27 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Strongly disagree. This article is about the M5 anti-tank gun only. The other article is about anti-aircraft guns of the M1918 family. Both definitely deserve their own articles. The M1918 article is indeed incomplete, but there is enough stuff to warrant a separate article. And anyway the solution is to improve it, not to merge it with the M5 article. Bukvoed (talk) 09:37, 27 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 3-inch Gun M5. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100929093247/http://www.army.mil/info/organization/unitsandcommands/commandstructure/theoldguard/specplt/psb.htm to http://www.army.mil/info/organization/unitsandcommands/commandstructure/theoldguard/specplt/psb.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081003092157/http://cgsc.leavenworth.army.mil/carl/download/csipubs/gabel2.pdf to http://cgsc.leavenworth.army.mil/carl/download/csipubs/gabel2.pdf
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.kcamps.org/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=4031

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:55, 23 December 2017 (UTC)Reply