Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Discussion: concerns |
→Review of Reguyla (Kumioko) reblock: Discussion closed, user banned by the community |
||
Line 46:
== Review of Reguyla (Kumioko) reblock ==
{{consensus|1=There has been a comprehensive community discussion about whether Reguyla/Kumioko should be banned from the project. We won't go into detailed history of blocks and noticeboard discussions, suffice to say that Reguyla has a long and 'bumpy' history on the English Wikpedia.
The vast majority of editors opining here have been in support of the ban. We believe it's important to note at this stage that a number of them have been clear that their support of the ban is not due to the edit which got Reguyla their current one month block, but rather a long history (and continuing pattern) of disruption, personal attacks and block evasion as well as some comments opining that Reguyla has been a time sink for the community for a long time and that does not appear to have changed.
The opposers are generally of the opinion that an indefinite siteban is too far or too harsh and that Reguyla has changed, however the opinions from the supporters (that this is not the case) are more numerous and include stronger evidence.
Regarding whether the ban should be only appealable to ArbCom/BASC, there wasn't a lot of direct discussion about this, however we have to assume that those opining to support were in favour of that part of the proposal as well. The Arbitration Committee has [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard&type=revision&diff=685465067&oldid=685464255 confirmed] that they will take responsibiltiy for any appeals of the ban.
The alternative proposal to postpone action until the block is lifted has been strongly rejected by the community primarily as opposers believe that Reguyla has already used up all the goodwill which could be given to them and that a strong statement from the community is needed and required not to reward Reguyla's behaviour or use up more time.
There is a strong consensus of the community that: '''Reguyla/Kumioko is [[WP:Site ban|site-banned]] from the English Wikipedia indefinitely. Reguyla may request a reconsideration of the ban twelve months after it is enacted and, if declined, not more than once every twelve months thereafter (or any longer interval defined by the Committee);''' the timer will reset after any and every instance of block evasion or inappropriate appeal (such as to UTRS). As the community's patience has been exhausted and there have been a number of discussions (appeals and reviews) about blocks and bans, '''Reguyla may only appeal to the [[WP:ArbCom|Arbitration Committee]] (at {{email|arbcom-l|lists.wikimedia.org}}).'''
To be clear, as this is a [[WP:CBAN|community ban]], administrators, acting without broad community consensus (or an ArbCom decision), are not permitted to overturn or lessen it.
After approximately 36 hours one of the closers will archive this thread to [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Reguyla-Kumiko community ban]] which will provide a central location for a log of any block evasion or inappropriate appeals (including those to UTRS or to individual admins) so that the 12 month timer is accurate.
Given the disruption which has almost always been associated with Reguyla/Kumioko we have taken the unusual step of removing talk page and email access as well as fully protecting Reguyla's userpage and talk page. Primarily to remove any possibility of grave-dancing but also to encourage Reguyla to move on, noting as well that given appeal is to BASC there is no need for either talk page or email access. We ask other admins not to change this without at least discussing it with us first.
'''Closed by:'''
:<b>[[User:Callanecc|Callanecc]]</b> ([[User talk:Callanecc|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Callanecc|contribs]] • [[Special:Log/Callanecc|logs]]) 02:45, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
:
:
}}
{{archive top}}
Earlier today Kumioko was unblocked by Worm That Turned. This was done without consulting the blocking admin, Floquenbeam, or the community. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Reguyla&diff=684208972&oldid=682685080 These restrictions] were placed upon him, one of which reads: "You may not comment on administrators as a group, nor on any sysop or desysop procedures." Kumioko's response can be read [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Reguyla&diff=684245670&oldid=684231696 here]. My query to WTT on blocking and his response can be read [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Worm_That_Turned&oldid=684299608#Reguyla here]. Upon reading [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Reguyla&diff=684293600&oldid=684291838 this comment], made less than an hour ago, I blocked for one month. I see no change in Kumioko's behavior. Posted here for review. --[[User:NeilN|<b style="color:navy">Neil<span style="color:red">N</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:NeilN|<i style="color:blue">talk to me</i>]]</sup> 20:01, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
:Noting that I agree with the 1 month reblock and have declined the unblock request on those grounds. That said, I'd appreciate comments on the unblock - and also remind people that my recall process are certainly open on this matter. [[User:Worm That Turned|<b style="text-shadow:0 -1px #DDD,1px 0 #DDD,0 1px #DDD,-1px 0 #DDD; color:#000;">''Worm''</b>]]<sup>TT</sup>([[User talk:Worm That Turned|<b style="color:#060;">talk</b>]]) 20:07, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
| |||