User contributions for 67.77.174.6

3 January 2012

• 01:5301:53, 3 January 2012 diff hist −1 Talk:National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 →Where is the youtube video where a democratic congressman/senator said the whitehouse in fact wanted the controversial wordiing?
• 01:5301:53, 3 January 2012 diff hist +544 Talk:National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 →Where is the youtube video where a democratic congressman/senator said the whitehouse in fact wanted the controversial wordiing?: new section

9 October 2011

• 13:0613:06, 9 October 2011 diff hist +45 User talk:완젬스 →creating my talk page
• 09:5109:51, 9 October 2011 diff hist +1 User talk:완젬스 No edit summary
• 04:2904:29, 9 October 2011 diff hist +1,257 User talk:Scjessey →Can we resolve the edit warring before Monday?: new section
• 01:5601:56, 9 October 2011 diff hist +29 Talk:American Jobs Act →How to handle the article differences
• 01:5601:56, 9 October 2011 diff hist −52 Talk:American Jobs Act →How to handle the article differences
• 01:5301:53, 9 October 2011 diff hist +866 Talk:American Jobs Act →How to handle the article differences

3 October 2011

• 23:1423:14, 3 October 2011 diff hist 0 Talk:American Jobs Act →Work to do over the weekend
• 23:1323:13, 3 October 2011 diff hist 0 Talk:American Jobs Act →Work to do over the weekend
• 23:0223:02, 3 October 2011 diff hist +2 Talk:American Jobs Act →Work to do over the weekend
• 23:0123:01, 3 October 2011 diff hist +2,662 Talk:American Jobs Act →Work to do over the weekend: new section

1 October 2011

• 00:1400:14, 1 October 2011 diff hist +1,058 User talk:Jarry1250 →If you get a chance this weekend: new section
• 00:0600:06, 1 October 2011 diff hist −1 Talk:American Jobs Act →Is a "making the case" section just part of POV'ing the article?
• 00:0500:05, 1 October 2011 diff hist +3,276 Talk:American Jobs Act No edit summary

30 September 2011

• 11:2711:27, 30 September 2011 diff hist −39 American Jobs Act →Democrats
• 11:1411:14, 30 September 2011 diff hist −1 American Jobs Act →Elements of the proposed bill: arranged the aspects from high to low
• 11:1111:11, 30 September 2011 diff hist +21 American Jobs Act →Elements of the proposed bill
• 11:0811:08, 30 September 2011 diff hist −161 American Jobs Act moved his pitch (which is repeated in the "making the case section") from the lead-in to the pitching containment section Tag: references removed
• 11:0211:02, 30 September 2011 diff hist −8 American Jobs Act →Elements of the proposed bill: https://mninews.deutsche-boerse.com/content/us-data-cost-breakdown-447-billion-america-jobs-act
• 10:5710:57, 30 September 2011 diff hist +7 American Jobs Act →Elements of the proposed bill
• 10:5710:57, 30 September 2011 diff hist +9 American Jobs Act →Elements of the proposed bill: changed it to cuttings, spendings, extendings, providings, and creatings (all grouped together)
• 10:4410:44, 30 September 2011 diff hist +259 American Jobs Act →Democrats
• 10:4110:41, 30 September 2011 diff hist +354 American Jobs Act →Democrats
• 10:2410:24, 30 September 2011 diff hist −50 American Jobs Act →Democrats: fixed source
• 10:2110:21, 30 September 2011 diff hist −409 American Jobs Act →Elements of the proposed bill
• 09:5509:55, 30 September 2011 diff hist −110 American Jobs Act →Elements of the proposed bill: Wikipedia gains more trust from readers if we don't hide it behind 2 clicks (one click is less "bitey" of the nooblios) Tag: references removed
• 07:5607:56, 30 September 2011 diff hist +699 Talk:American Jobs Act →Is a "making the case" section just part of POV'ing the article?
• 07:5007:50, 30 September 2011 diff hist 0 American Jobs Act →Legislative history: tenuous connects with the subordinate clause at the end of the sentence "which is less likely to draw political attention" answers why it is tenuous

29 September 2011

• 20:2020:20, 29 September 2011 diff hist +168 Talk:American Jobs Act →Is a "making the case" section just part of POV'ing the article?
• 17:0817:08, 29 September 2011 diff hist +445 Talk:American Jobs Act →Is a "making the case" section just part of POV'ing the article?
• 17:0517:05, 29 September 2011 diff hist −1 American Jobs Act →Alternative bill from Republicans: taking away empty line spacing
• 17:0517:05, 29 September 2011 diff hist +615 American Jobs Act →Reception by Republicans
• 16:5216:52, 29 September 2011 diff hist +1 Talk:American Jobs Act →Is a "making the case" section just part of POV'ing the article?
• 16:5216:52, 29 September 2011 diff hist +246 Talk:American Jobs Act →Is a "making the case" section just part of POV'ing the article?
• 16:5016:50, 29 September 2011 diff hist +8 Talk:American Jobs Act →Is a "making the case" just part of POV'ing the article?
• 16:3416:34, 29 September 2011 diff hist +7 User talk:99.141.179.204 No edit summary
• 16:3316:33, 29 September 2011 diff hist +270 N User talk:99.141.179.204 ←Created page with '[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Solyndra&diff=next&oldid=451360756 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Solyndra&diff=next&oldid=451360756?] ~~~~'
• 16:2816:28, 29 September 2011 diff hist +100 Talk:American Jobs Act →Is a "making the case" just part of POV'ing the article?
• 16:2516:25, 29 September 2011 diff hist +1,792 Talk:American Jobs Act →Is a "making the case" just part of POV'ing the article?: new section

28 September 2011

• 18:2818:28, 28 September 2011 diff hist +145 Talk:American Jobs Act →How is it neutral to give a single (negative) detail on the house version?
• 18:2618:26, 28 September 2011 diff hist −2 American Jobs Act →Alternative bill from Republicans
• 18:2118:21, 28 September 2011 diff hist +206 Talk:American Jobs Act →How is it neutral to give a single (negative) detail on the house version?
• 18:2018:20, 28 September 2011 diff hist −184 User talk:Scjessey →Obama jobs act
• 18:1618:16, 28 September 2011 diff hist +14 User talk:Scjessey →Obama jobs act
• 18:1518:15, 28 September 2011 diff hist +358 User talk:Scjessey →Obama jobs act
• 17:5917:59, 28 September 2011 diff hist +7 User talk:Scjessey →How is it neutral to give a single (negative) detail on the house version?
• 17:5817:58, 28 September 2011 diff hist +711 User talk:Scjessey →How is it neutral to give a single (negative) detail on the house version?: new section
• 16:3916:39, 28 September 2011 diff hist +846 Talk:Budget Control Act of 2011 →What does this part mean?: new section
• 16:1916:19, 28 September 2011 diff hist −230 American Jobs Act No edit summary