[go: up one dir, main page]
Wikipedia

Pacific DC Intertie

(Redirected from Pacific Intertie)
Map all coordinates using OpenStreetMap

Download coordinates as:

The Pacific DC Intertie (also called Path 65) is an electric power transmission line that transmits electricity from the Pacific Northwest to the Los Angeles area using high voltage direct current (HVDC). The line capacity is 3.1 gigawatts, which is enough to serve two to three million Los Angeles households and represents almost half of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) electrical system's peak capacity.[1]

Map of the route of the Pacific Intertie transmission route and stations

The intertie originates near the Columbia River at the Celilo Converter Station of Bonneville Power Administration's grid outside The Dalles, Oregon and is connected to the Sylmar Converter Station north of Los Angeles, which is owned by five utility companies and managed by LADWP. The Intertie can transmit power in either direction, but power flows mostly from north to south.

The section of the line in Oregon is owned and operated by Bonneville Power Administration, while the line in Nevada and California is owned and operated by Los Angeles Department of Water and Power.[2] The transition is at the Oregon–Nevada border, at 41°59′47″N 119°57′44″W / 41.9964°N 119.9623°W / 41.9964; -119.9623 (Pacific Intertie ownership boundary).

This is one of two HVDC lines serving Los Angeles; the other is Path 27.

Overview

edit

The idea of sending hydroelectric power to Southern California had been proposed as early as the 1930s, but was opposed and scrapped. By 1961, US president John F. Kennedy authorized a large public works project, using new high voltage direct current technology from Sweden. The project was undertaken as a close collaboration between General Electric of the US and ASEA of Sweden. Private California power companies had opposed the project but their technical objections were rebutted by Uno Lamm of ASEA at an IEEE meeting in New York in 1963. When completed in 1970 the combined AC and DC transmission system was estimated to save consumers in Los Angeles approximately US$600,000 per day by use of cheaper electric power from dams on the Columbia River.

One advantage of direct current over AC is that DC current penetrates the entire conductor as opposed to AC current which only penetrates to the skin depth. For the same conductor size, the effective resistance is greater with AC than DC, hence more power is lost as heat with AC. In general, the total cost for HVDC is less than an AC line if the line length is over 500–600 miles, and with advances in conversion technology, this distance has been reduced considerably. A DC line is also ideal for connecting two AC systems that are not synchronized with each other. HVDC lines can help stabilize a power grid against cascading blackouts since power flow through the line is controllable.

The Pacific Intertie takes advantage of differing power demand patterns between the northwestern and southwestern US. During winter, the northern region operates electrical heating devices while the southern portion uses relatively little electricity. In summer, the north uses little electricity while the south reaches peak demand due to air conditioning usage. Any time the Intertie demand lessens, the excess is distributed elsewhere on the western power grid (states west of the Great Plains, including Colorado and New Mexico).[3]

  • The HVDC power line in Los Angeles (shorter tower carrying two wires on the right). The power line crosses Interstate 5 near the interchange with Interstate 210 in Sylmar. 
    The HVDC power line in Los Angeles (shorter tower carrying two wires on the right). The power line crosses Interstate 5 near the interchange with Interstate 210 in Sylmar.
  • The Pacific DC Intertie along a service road paralleling U.S. Highway 395. Many of the towers of the Intertie are of this simple, slender design 
    The Pacific DC Intertie along a service road paralleling U.S. Highway 395. Many of the towers of the Intertie are of this simple, slender design
  • The slender tower's base tapers down to a single point that is bolted to a concrete anchor 
    The slender tower's base tapers down to a single point that is bolted to a concrete anchor
  • The slender tower is supported laterally by four guy-wires 
    The slender tower is supported laterally by four guy-wires
  • The Pacific Intertie outside of Benton, California 
    The Pacific Intertie outside of Benton, California
  • Pacific DC Intertie towers (left side) near Fernley, Nevada. The first few towers are self-supported. The towers on the far side use guy-wires. 
    Pacific DC Intertie towers (left side) near Fernley, Nevada. The first few towers are self-supported. The towers on the far side use guy-wires.

Components

edit

The Pacific Intertie consists of:[4]

History

edit
 
Sylmar East station, rededicated as the Sylmar Converter Station in 2005 following the upgrade to 3,100 MW.

The first phase of the scheme, completed in May 1970, used only mercury-arc valves in the converters.[6] The valves were series connected in three six-pulse valve bridges for each pole. The blocking voltage of the valves was 133 kV with a maximum current of 1,800 amperes, for a transmission rating of 1,440 MW with a symmetrical voltage of 400 kV with respect to earth.

Each converter station housed six mercury arc valves groups, consisting each of seven valves, for a total of 42 valves in each converter. The valves had a width of 7.1 feet (2.15 m), a height of 10 feet (3.2 m) and a length of 11 feet (3.5 m) and weighed 14,000 pounds (6,400 kg). Each valve contained 1.1 litres (37 US fl oz) mercury, with a weight of 33 pounds (14.9 kg).

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ Sharon Bernstein and Amanda Covarrubias (July 10, 2006). "Heat Wave Caught DWP Unprepared". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 23 September 2020.
  2. ^ "Pacific Direct Current Intertie (PDCI) Upgrade Project (DOE/EA-1937) Lake, Jefferson, Crook, Deschutes, and Wasco counties, Oregon". Bonneville Power Administration. Retrieved 2019-12-29.
  3. ^ Prabha Kundur, Powertech Labs Inc. (October 3, 2003). "Power System Security in the New Industry Environment: Challenges and Solutions". IEEE. p. 17. Archived from the original (PowerPoint) on August 22, 2006. Retrieved 2006-09-11.
  4. ^ "The Pacific Intertie Scheme". Bonneville Power Administration. 2000-11-03. Archived from the original on 2005-04-26. Retrieved 2009-08-20.
  5. ^ "Review of The Infrastructural City, edited by Kazys Varnelis". Places Journal.
  6. ^ Compendium of HVDC schemes, CIGRÉ Technical Brochure No. 003, 1987, pp57-62.
  7. ^ "Pacific Intertie". Hitachi Energy. Retrieved 20 April 2024.
  8. ^ "Sylmar West HVDC station". ABB. Retrieved 20 April 2024.
  9. ^ a b c "ABB Rededicates Sylmar Converter Station (Press Release)". ABB. 24 March 2005. Archived from the original on 1 February 2009.
  10. ^ "Fire aspects of HVDC thyristor valves and valve halls", CIGRÉ Technical Brochure No. 136, February 1999.
  11. ^ Christl, N., Faehnrich, W., Lips, P., Rasmussen, F., Sadek, K., "Thyristor Valve Replacement Of The Pacific Intertie Expansion Sylmar East 500 Kv HVDC Converter Station", IEEE Sixth International Conference on AC and DC Power Transmission (Conf. Publ. No. 423), 1996.
  12. ^ "Celilo Converter Station", Bonneville Power Administration [1], April 2016. (Fact Sheet)
  13. ^ "ABB completes upgrade of first major HVDC link in U.S. transmission history", ABB [2] 20 June 2016. (press release)
edit
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pacific_DC_Intertie&oldid=1219883465"