Talk:M134 Minigun

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the M134 Minigun article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months

This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Firearms Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military science, technology, and theory task force Weaponry task force North American military history task force United States military history task force

The users section needs to be more like that of Walther P5#Users: stating examples of how citizens of that nation used the gun.

Also have any infantry (boots on the ground) people ever held and used a minigun (while sitting, standing, walking, etc.)? It might be too heavy, but if someone has in a military conflict then that could be something to write in the "Users" section. --User123o987name (talk) 08:19, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Мініган.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:07, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"The "Mini" in the name is in comparison to larger-caliber designs that use a rotary barrel design, such as General Electric's earlier 20 mm M61 Vulcan, and "gun" for the use of rifle ammunition as opposed to autocannon shells. " That's a little bit misleading. It was called the "minigun" because it was directly derived from GE's 20mm Vulcan cannon. The Vulcan was the first and only rotary type cannon in service, so the name isn't to differentiate if from "larger caliber designs", but from the Vulcan alone. It is a "Mini" gun because it's a scaled down Vulcan able to be mounted on lighter aircraft, firing rifle caliber ammunition. It's a "gun" because it's a gun. An autocannon is also a gun. They could have easily renamed the Vulcan the "Megagun" to match and no one could have said they were inaccurate to do so. The name "minigun" was not a serious attempt at making up a descriptor for the new class of weapon, it was mere marketing. The name was catchy and caught on, and so people use it generically for any multiple barrel weapon, even heavy autocannons sometimes, but in reality it's only a "Minigun" because the Vulcan. It was developed before there WERE any other designs to diffentiate from.

Idumea47b (talk) 02:29, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]